US Egg Posted yesterday at 03:21 PM Posted yesterday at 03:21 PM 9 hours ago, Special K said: Excellent Game 1.....the Oilers two superstars come through in the clutch once again. Something good is bound to happen when they are on the ice together. Was the puck over the glass penalty flagrant? Kind of a killer to lose in OT on one of those, but it’s early and Panthers are a veteran team. Quote
Special K Posted yesterday at 04:08 PM Posted yesterday at 04:08 PM 46 minutes ago, US Egg said: Was the puck over the glass penalty flagrant? Kind of a killer to lose in OT on one of those, but it’s early and Panthers are a veteran team. It's shaping up to be a 7 game series for sure. 1 Quote
Jauronimo Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM 1 hour ago, US Egg said: Was the puck over the glass penalty flagrant? Kind of a killer to lose in OT on one of those, but it’s early and Panthers are a veteran team. What do you mean by flagrant? He was under pressure and fired the puck out of the rink. There is no room in the rule for interpretation. 1 Quote
T&C Posted yesterday at 05:27 PM Posted yesterday at 05:27 PM 2 hours ago, US Egg said: Was the puck over the glass penalty flagrant? Kind of a killer to lose in OT on one of those, but it’s early and Panthers are a veteran team. Nosek had that no sugar tonight look when he sat down in the penalty box... it was just a routine screw up, I don't think flagrant really fits the play. I hope the Oilers win tomorrow night too... 1 1 Quote
US Egg Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, Jauronimo said: What do you mean by flagrant? He was under pressure and fired the puck out of the rink. There is no room in the rule for interpretation. I know the rule, I didn't see it and was simply asking how it went down.....geesh! Quote
Jauronimo Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Just now, US Egg said: I know the rule, I didn't see it and was simply asking how it went down.....geesh! He flipped the puck over the glass. Are there degrees of flagrance in this act? I don't know what you're asking. Quote
Simon Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, Jauronimo said: He flipped the puck over the glass. Are there degrees of flagrance in this act? I don't know what you're asking. Did he drop it gently over the glass with a loft wedge so it landed like a butterfly with sore feet? Or was it more a protecting the plate/bloop foul ball into the stands that landed in some ho's kielbasa and coated her cleavage with delicious spicy mustard? Or did he point to a crying baby in the second level and then rip a biscuit right into it's annoying, toothless gob? 2 Quote
eball Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 5 hours ago, US Egg said: Was the puck over the glass penalty flagrant? Kind of a killer to lose in OT on one of those, but it’s early and Panthers are a veteran team. The level of his intention is irrelevant. He put the puck out of play, therefore it is a delay of game penalty. In a game where many penalties are subject to interpretation, this one is refreshingly simple and straightforward. Quote
Jauronimo Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 11 minutes ago, eball said: The level of his intention is irrelevant. He put the puck out of play, therefore it is a delay of game penalty. In a game where many penalties are subject to interpretation, this one is refreshingly simple and straightforward. Its never intentional anymore. He tried to clear it high off the glass so it would exit the zone but without the heat on it to ice the puck but he got under the puck too much and it went over the glass. Just like the 10,000 times it happens in the regular season. That said, it did not meet the criteria for flagrant 2 delay of game where a player intentionally launches the puck into the upper deck with intent to stop play. A flagrant 2 delay of game results in a minor penalty and a 2 min man advantage. Quote
US Egg Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 1 minute ago, eball said: The level of his intention is irrelevant. He put the puck out of play, therefore it is a delay of game penalty. In a game where many penalties are subject to interpretation, this one is refreshingly simple and straightforward. 1 hour ago, Jauronimo said: He flipped the puck over the glass. Are there degrees of flagrance in this act? I don't know what you're asking. I was curious if Edmonton was buzzing around and he flung it in desperation or simply was clearing the zone and haphazardly blooped it. Apologies for the complexity of my ponderance. 1 Quote
Doc Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, Jauronimo said: Its never intentional anymore. He tried to clear it high off the glass so it would exit the zone but without the heat on it to ice the puck but he got under the puck too much and it went over the glass. Just like the 10,000 times it happens in the regular season. That said, it did not meet the criteria for flagrant 2 delay of game where a player intentionally launches the puck into the upper deck with intent to stop play. A flagrant 2 delay of game results in a minor penalty and a 2 min man advantage. Never heard of that before. Quote
Jauronimo Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Doc said: Never heard of that before. Probably because I just made it up. 1 Quote
Doc Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 48 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: Probably because I just made it up. Thought so. Quote
Talley56 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago The only time the Panthers ever played the Oilers in the NFL Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.