FireChans Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 1 hour ago, Mikie2times said: Is the rest of the argument not accurate? No it’s not, as evidenced by that ridiculous opinion. Anyone holds that opinion and they don’t know nothing about nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauleeeWalnuts Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 (edited) 3 hours ago, BuffaninSarasota said: you lost me at “Kincaid has cement hands” Had some big drops, hope you’re no longer lost Edited May 5 by PauleeeWalnuts 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 I think what will see this year is a more BALANCED attack on offense , Knox is now healthy two TE sets / a solid running game and more play action , 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrimeTime101 Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 14 hours ago, Bill from NYC said: Fine but the thread title does not indicate this. Then go read it AGAIN... he is clearly stating a question to be answered. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 hour ago, Putin said: I think what will see this year is a more BALANCED attack on offense , Knox is now healthy two TE sets / a solid running game and more play action , I think Josh Allen excels in play action, so that would be a good thing. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kornfed Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Can't help but wonder if Josh will be more efficient without Diggs demanding targets. Just dropping back and reading what's available. .... Nobody questioning who's the boss on the field. ........ If Josh is as good as I think he is, he'll flourish doing what he sees in Brady's offense. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikie2times Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 5 hours ago, FireChans said: No it’s not, as evidenced by that ridiculous opinion. Anyone holds that opinion and they don’t know nothing about nothing. Most of what you say makes no sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90sBills Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 2 hours ago, Kornfed said: Can't help but wonder if Josh will be more efficient without Diggs demanding targets. Just dropping back and reading what's available. .... Nobody questioning who's the boss on the field. ........ If Josh is as good as I think he is, he'll flourish doing what he sees in Brady's offense. And if he doesn’t and the offense stalls it’s because ‘no receivers’. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 In a year that made the most sense to double dip at wr, Beane chose not to. And my reasoning was simply 2 factors. First, you may not see another pool of wr talent in a draft like this for several years. Second, it acts as an insurance policy in case Coleman doesn't pan out. It wouldn't of killed BB to grab Franklin or Walker in the mid rounds. No one is rooting for Keon to shine more than me. But if he struggles, it will go down in "Beane Lore" as a collasal mistake. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kornfed Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 3 hours ago, 90sBills said: And if he doesn’t and the offense stalls it’s because ‘no receivers’. Cmon man..... The team started to find cohesiveness in the second half of the season. Josh. Shakir and Kincaid. .... There's more focus and continuity growing with out (although I loved him like everybody) Diggs distraction. ....... Now the staff just get to put the puzzle pieces on the field without a super ego say WTF? ..... I hope I'm right. ..... It's got to make things a bit easier for the coaches and Josh to focus on what should be done rather than who should do it. .... This is true. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaninSarasota Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 9 hours ago, PauleeeWalnuts said: Had some big drops, hope you’re no longer lost "some big drops" ? ..... please elaborate Kincaid is a vacuum cleaner. Sounds like you're still lost in the Pine Barrens. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Detroit and SF WRs are incredible. St Brown is so much better than anything we have. Then you have the Bengals which have completely shred us. You are constantly losing to KC who at one time was unstoppable because they had Hill and Kelce. Almost on purpose trying to not have good WRs is senseless. It benefited nobody. You should be trying to be as good as you can. Especially with rookie wage restrictions. We should have gone up and gotten 1 if not 2 top end WRs. I’m not saying we are going to be bad, but replacing a top WR in franchise history with nobody is not going to be a smart idea. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChans Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 9 hours ago, Mikie2times said: Most of what you say makes no sense Go ahead and challenge what I said. You can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 On 5/4/2024 at 9:23 AM, eball said: Weaker than Baltimore and Detroit? Come on. St. Brown is a slot receiver. Baltimore’s offense is always shut down in the playoffs. KC got better with Worthy but who knows when Kelce starts slipping (and Rice is a ?). It’s not an uphill battle at all. As many have noted, Buffalo’s problem in the playoffs hasn’t been offense — it’s stopping Mahomes and Burrow. only "a slot receiver"....with 1500+ yards and 10 TDs. lol this thread... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90sBills Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 5 hours ago, Kornfed said: Cmon man..... The team started to find cohesiveness in the second half of the season. Josh. Shakir and Kincaid. .... There's more focus and continuity growing with out (although I loved him like everybody) Diggs distraction. ....... Now the staff just get to put the puzzle pieces on the field without a super ego say WTF? ..... I hope I'm right. ..... It's got to make things a bit easier for the coaches and Josh to focus on what should be done rather than who should do it. .... This is true. I agree with all of this. I just think we need more proven receivers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 2 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: Detroit and SF WRs are incredible. St Brown is so much better than anything we have. Then you have the Bengals which have completely shred us. You are constantly losing to KC who at one time was unstoppable because they had Hill and Kelce. Almost on purpose trying to not have good WRs is senseless. It benefited nobody. You should be trying to be as good as you can. Especially with rookie wage restrictions. We should have gone up and gotten 1 if not 2 top end WRs. I’m not saying we are going to be bad, but replacing a top WR in franchise history with nobody is not going to be a smart idea. If we are solid most everywhere and have a glaring WR need next draft - which I doubt will be glaring - you make this move at the 2025 draft. We didn’t have enough to move up this year. Next year, especially if we miss the playoffs, we will have enough. That will give us Coleman, the 2025 Rookie WR, and the rest with tons of cap space with little of it committed to WR bc Diggs cap hit will be gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosejob Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 11 hours ago, Kornfed said: Can't help but wonder if Josh will be more efficient without Diggs demanding targets. Just dropping back and reading what's available. .... Nobody questioning who's the boss on the field. ........ If Josh is as good as I think he is, he'll flourish doing what he sees in Brady's offense. I'm expecting a great year for Josh. Nobody (allegedly) constantly nipping at his ankles. Gonna be larging and in charging. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: If we are solid most everywhere and have a glaring WR need next draft - which I doubt will be glaring - you make this move at the 2025 draft. We didn’t have enough to move up this year. Next year, especially if we miss the playoffs, we will have enough. That will give us Coleman, the 2025 Rookie WR, and the rest with tons of cap space with little of it committed to WR bc Diggs cap hit will be gone. 10 picks in your pocket wasn't enough to move up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Harris 69 Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 23 hours ago, PauleeeWalnuts said: They did not do enough at WR. You have JA17 as your friggin QB, he needs as many targets and downfield threats as possible. Instead you traded away his #1 and his #2 left in FA and really didn’t replace either. Samuel you can argue may replace Davis, but there is definitely no #1 in that building. Knox is invisible, Kincaid has cement hands, Cook drops too many easy balls, and you have no idea what you’re getting from the rookie Coleman. You can’t compete for a championship when the Bills always address the WR position as they do. You can, however, compete for an early playoff exit which they consistently do. I have to disagree Mr. Walnuts. The Kansas City Chiefs won the Super Bowl with a bunch of hockey pucks playing receiver. Kelce even had a bit of a down year. They beat the 49ers, who are loaded at receiver. They also defeated the Ravens who have two very good receivers and a solid TE. The Ravens lost because they tried to out pass the Chiefs instead of just being the best rushing team in the AFC. The Bills, seeing KC’s success are emulating the approach. What team with a twenty five million dollar receiver has won it all? The answer is none. A variety of targets schemed in the right way, with a good running attack is enough when JA17 is Quarterback. Hell I can’t wait to see our younger jumped up defense fly around. These are some exciting times mates! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 16 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: 10 picks in your pocket wasn't enough to move up? The Cardinals, Giants, and Bears were not trading back to 28 and passing on the top 3 WRs. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.