Jump to content

Training Camp 7/30 9:45am


The Wiz

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, PBF81 said:

Allen was an incredibly anomalous risky pick that worked out.   I really don't think it appropriate to bring Beane up at this point in time in the season, but since you insist,

 

LOL this is rich.  You said, and I quote exactly, “Beane drafted Kincaid in a monkey-see-monkey-do attempt to replicate Kelce.   We haven't seen much originality in the team/roster-building strategies on this team.”

 

So you can slam Beane as using a “monkey see monkey do attempt to replicate Kelce” as a draft strategy (instead of, you know, having a team of scouts evaluate talent and building a draft board, then following it) and as lacking originality in team and roster building strategies.

 

But then when called on a shallow approach without substance behind it, you turn around and say “I really don’t think it appropriate to bring Beane up at this point in time in the season” - when that’s EXACTLY WHAT YOU DID, since we all know who is responsible for draft choices and for building the team.

 

SMH.

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SCBills said:


Here’s my issue with this…

 

-We hear how we had to pay Oliver because we need a proven 3T in this defense.  
 

-We hear how we need pass rushers off the edge, because well - I agree - this is obvious. 
 

-We hear how important high level Safety play is for the defense. 
 

-We needed to invest in CB2 opposite Tre .. that was the prevailing worry pre-draft two years ago. 
 

-Now we hear how important MLB is to the defense…

 

Ok, we can’t have All-Pro’s at every position.   Not EVERY position is imperative to this defense.  
 

If so, why tf do we have a defensive minded HC in Sean McDermott?

 

 

You make some good points.

 

FWIW, McDermott took the team to playoffs his 1st year with Preston Brown at MLB and ….I’m trying to think who else, Ramon Humber? And Zo Alexander.

We weren’t a top-5 or top 6 defense.  Middle of the pack.  But our secondary and DL weren’t as good.

 

TBH I think one factor in Frazier “leave of absence” was that he was told we’re likely to lose Tremaine Edmunds, we can’t match what he’s gonna get, and we need to spend our high draft picks on offense.  So you’re gonna need to look at the guys already on the roster, maybe 3rd round or later rookie, and figure out how to make that work at MLB

 

Frazier concluded it wasn’t going to do his HC quest any good to drop from the #1 or #2 defense of the last two seasons back to 15 or 16, so he bowed out.

 

That’s just my thinking though, who knows?  Maybe the people who think it was a force out or a quiet firing are right and I’m wrong.

 

It’s certainly stand-and-deliver time for McDermott as a defensive HC

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

LOL this is rich.  You said, and I quote exactly, “Beane drafted Kincaid in a monkey-see-monkey-do attempt to replicate Kelce.   We haven't seen much originality in the team/roster-building strategies on this team.”

 

So you can slam Beane as using a “monkey see monkey do attempt to replicate Kelce” as a draft strategy (instead of, you know, having a team of scouts evaluate talent and building a draft board, then following it) and as lacking originality in team and roster building strategies.

 

But then when called on a shallow approach without substance behind it, you turn around and say “I really don’t think it appropriate to bring Beane up at this point in time in the season” - when that’s EXACTLY WHAT YOU DID, since we all know who is responsible for draft choices and for building the team.

 

SMH.

 

What are we, in 6th grade.  LOL  

 

Whatever.  You claimed that he's been original, when I asked you how, you threw it into my lap. 

 

It's not that important, really, it isn't.  

 

LOL  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

What are we, in 6th grade.  LOL  

 

Whatever.  You claimed that he's been original, when I asked you how, you threw it into my lap. 

 

It's not that important, really, it isn't.  

 

LOL 

 

How do we know Dorsey isn't going to be original when we haven't seen the product on the field yet this season?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dr. Who said:

I don't really bet. As an academic and a poet, I don't have cash to play with. But if I did, I think I'd put some down on Spector as an interesting speculation at MLB.

 

I'm SO sorry about the bolded!

 

**I, too, used to rock the poor prof/creative practitioner combo pack. But I had to add high-end restaurant server to the mix. The serving gig got me pretty amazing access to the team for a lot of years, though. Then that whole pandemic thing happened and it all went away! Thanks for coming to my TEDtalk. 

 

Spector is an interesting speculation, indeed. Went back recently to look at his draft profile and RAS; was surprised I'd missed or forgotten what an athletic specimen he is: 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

I give up, how?  

 

The discussion wasn't about Dorsey. 

 

By waiting to see it. 

 

And Beane would be listening to Dorsey to find out what he needs.  Hence the reason Dorsey needs to be the one who is original. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

I’ve been hard on Gabe after last year.  Oh my God if he can pick it up this year.

 

Each offseason Gabe works hard on some aspect of his game which he thinks is a weakness or something he can increase during offseason.

I am sure he did it this offseason but hope he choose right aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

By waiting to see it. 

 

And Beane would be listening to Dorsey to find out what he needs.  Hence the reason Dorsey needs to be the one who is original. 

 

Again, to bad the discussion wasn't about Dorsey.  Why waste our time?  

 

 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

You make some good points.

 

FWIW, McDermott took the team to playoffs his 1st year with Preston Brown at MLB and ….I’m trying to think who else, Ramon Humber? And Zo Alexander.

We weren’t a top-5 or top 6 defense.  Middle of the pack.  But our secondary and DL weren’t as good.

 

TBH I think one factor in Frazier “leave of absence” was that he was told we’re likely to lose Tremaine Edmunds, we can’t match what he’s gonna get, and we need to spend our high draft picks on offense.  So you’re gonna need to look at the guys already on the roster, maybe 3rd round or later rookie, and figure out how to make that work at MLB

 

Frazier concluded it wasn’t going to do his HC quest any good to drop from the #1 or #2 defense of the last two seasons back to 15 or 16, so he bowed out.

 

That’s just my thinking though, who knows?  Maybe the people who think it was a force out or a quiet firing are right and I’m wrong.

 

It’s certainly stand-and-deliver time for McDermott as a defensive HC


If Frazier thought Edmunds was the key to having the #1 or 2 defense, it was definitely time for him to step away. 
 

This was the softest yet most obvious firing ever. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eball said:


If Frazier thought Edmunds was the key to having the #1 or 2 defense, it was definitely time for him to step away. 
 

This was the softest yet most obvious firing ever. 
 

 

It may have been, it may not have been.  Both Beane and McDermott have said if he wanted to, he would be the DC this year.  They haven't said that about the other coordinators and position coaches who "sought opportunities elsewhere".

 

I'm certain Da Bears paid Tremaine Edmunds $50 million guaranteed on a 4 yr/$72M contract because 1) they agree with you 2) he had no other suitors.

 

Decisions, Decisions.  Who to believe, @eball and others on TBD?  Or Matt Eberflus, Ryan Poles, and others who make a living doing football stuff?  You got a super-cool avatar that I've loved for years, I'll give you that, but I'm gonna go with the football execs.

 

The post I was responding to pointed out all the talent we have on D and all the talented additions except at MLB, so I don't know about Edmunds as "THE key".  But an important part of that #1 or #2 defense, I don't think is arguable and last year was probably Edmunds best.

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

It may have been, it may not have been.  Both Beane and McDermott have said if he wanted to, he would be the DC this year.  They haven't said that about the other coordinators and position coaches who "sought opportunities elsewhere".

 

I'm certain Da Bears paid Tremaine Edmunds $50 million guaranteed on a 4 yr/$72M contract because 1) they agree with you 2) he had no other suitors.

 

Decisions, Decisions.  Who to believe, @eball and others on TBD?  Or Matt Eberflus, Ryan Poles, and others who make a living doing football stuff?  You got a super-cool avatar that I've loved for years, I'll give you that, but I'm gonna go with the football execs.

 

The post I was responding to pointed out all the talent we have on D and all the talented additions except at MLB, so I don't know about Edmunds as "THE key".  But an important part of that #1 or #2 defense, I don't think is arguable and last year was probably Edmunds best.


Meh. I’ve been around the block and can differentiate between coach-speak and reality. McD and Beane would never disparage Frazier publicly. And yes, everyone is enamored with Edmunds’ abilities, but that doesn’t mean he’s “the” difference maker in today’s NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

It may have been, it may not have been.  Both Beane and McDermott have said if he wanted to, he would be the DC this year.  They haven't said that about the other coordinators and position coaches who "sought opportunities elsewhere".

 

I'm certain Da Bears paid Tremaine Edmunds $50 million guaranteed on a 4 yr/$72M contract because 1) they agree with you 2) he had no other suitors.

 

Decisions, Decisions.  Who to believe, @eball and others on TBD?  Or Matt Eberflus, Ryan Poles, and others who make a living doing football stuff?  You got a super-cool avatar that I've loved for years, I'll give you that, but I'm gonna go with the football execs.

 

The post I was responding to pointed out all the talent we have on D and all the talented additions except at MLB, so I don't know about Edmunds as "THE key".  But an important part of that #1 or #2 defense, I don't think is arguable and last year was probably Edmunds best.

They said he would’ve been the DC-  

 

Did they say he would’ve been calling the defensive plays?  
 

In my unprofessional opinion-   he left because he was to be stripped of the play calling and that’s a demotion.  Why would anyone hire him as HC if he had the play calling stripped?  Why would he want to stay.  That’s embarrassing.  
 

I don’t think it had anything to do with 49.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...