Jump to content

Voter fraud!


Recommended Posts

 

New Mexico Finds Errors in Dominion Voting Machine Software Similar to Recent Issues Identified in Tennessee

by Joe Hoft

 

Another issue with the software in Dominion voting machines was reported last night in New Mexico.

 

Earlier this week we reported that there were errors found in the EAC certified Dominion machines in a recent election in Tennessee.

 

 

The ‘glitch’ moved a ballot and all ballots after that ballot to the adjudication process. From there the ballots could be manipulated since not processed in the normal count process.Nick Moseder reports:“What can you do with provisional ballots set off to the side? You can mass adjudicate them anytime down the road however you want and then tabulate them to the count using the RTR process outlined in the Dominion user manuals.

 

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/new-mexico-finds-errors-dominion-voting-machine-software-similar-recent-issues-identified-tennessee/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2022 at 12:39 PM, DRsGhost said:

Most secure election in US history!

 

 

I will honestly be interested in the State Secretary response of the states that are called out here, especially in Georgia since it is pretty clear GA was a complete travesty. The rest of states I will wait to see what the states can show and what they will dispute, because I watched Michael Moore 911 film and it was 80% inconsequential truths and 20% exciting lies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This film of course is for fringe conspiracy theory extremists and all of it is easily debunked (see "most secure election in US history")

 

Then I wonder why you can't find trailers on YouTube or why the official 2000mules account was suspended by Twitter? It kind of sounds like the hunter laptop story that was squelched as Russian disinformation....and oh by the way was real all along...doesn't it?

 

 

I watched an interview with the researchers who compiled this evidence and I believe that this statement below isn't quite accurate. In the interview I watched they stressed that the 23 drop box visits per mule was an arbitrary CUTOFF to keep the data set more manageable. It wasn't an average. Therefore mules that visited <23 drop boxes were not even included in this analysis.

 

Quote

 

Each trafficker—or mule—went to an average of 23 ballot drop boxes, according to the researchers. The mules collected ballots from stash houses in the targeted areas and deposited them in drop boxes—often in the wee hours of the morning, from 1:00 to 5:00 a.m.

Over the course of several weeks, the vote traffickers made multiple trips to drop boxes using gloves to conceal their fingerprints, and taking photos to secure payment. D’Souza notes that the traffickers started wearing gloves a few days after a ballot harvesting case in Arizona secured indictments based on fingerprint evidence.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...