Jump to content

Trump’s follies


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, John Adams said:

 

Of course you don't. Easier to cast aspersions against people you don't interact with than the people in your own community that spends so much time talking up a big game about pedophiles. 

 

What on earth is this gibberish?  You're doubling down on crazy, and it just makes you look crazy, twice.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2022 at 11:08 AM, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

What on earth is this gibberish?  You're doubling down on crazy, and it just makes you look crazy, twice.  

 

I will try to pretend that you don’t know what I’m talking about. This is not a secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

I will try to pretend that you don’t know what I’m talking about. This is not a secret.

I have no clue what you are talking about.  There was a pedo posting here? Did anyone report them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, John Adams said:

 

I will try to pretend that you don’t know what I’m talking about. This is not a secret.

You can pretend you’re a long deceased president for all I care.  You’re spinning a tale of unknown communities, mysterious posters, and referencing websites that a few posters here seem to be obsessed with.  I’m not one of them. 
 

Everyone has the right to be a d$#@ once in a while, but there’s no need to abuse the privilege.  
 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2022 at 9:23 PM, Tenhigh said:

I have no clue what you are talking about.  There was a pedo posting here? Did anyone report them?


You’re new here. Unlike others maybe you didn’t know. It was openly discussed. News reports shared.
 

21 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You can pretend you’re a long deceased president for all I care.  You’re spinning a tale of unknown communities, mysterious posters, and referencing websites that a few posters here seem to be obsessed with.  I’m not one of them. 
 

Everyone has the right to be a d$#@ once in a while, but there’s no need to abuse the privilege.  
 

 

 

 


Except that this is true. Shouldn’t be hard for you to track down. 
 

Via con Dios. 

Edited by John Adams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John Adams said:


You’re new here. Unlike others maybe you didn’t know. It was openly discussed. News reports shared.
 


Except that this is true. Shouldn’t be hard for you to track down. 
 

Via con Dios. 

 

Vaya.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2021 at 10:02 AM, BillStime said:

Lindsey Graham told Trump over the summer 'you f---ed your presidency up,' book claims. Trump hung up.

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump labored until the end to overturn President Biden's win, and that included making their case to two Republican senators, Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Mike Lee (Utah), in the days before Congress certified the results Jan. 6...

 

Giuliani on Jan. 2 presented Graham with a computer whiz who said his statistical analysis showed Biden losing, Woodward and Costa report. Graham said he needed "some names" and "evidence," so Giuliani returned two days later with several memos and affidavits claiming fraud.

 

Graham sent Giuliani's memos to his chief Judiciary Committee counsel Lee Holmes, who "found the sloppiness, the overbearing tone of certainty, and the inconsistencies disqualifying" and "reported to Graham that the data in the memos were a concoction, with a bullying tone and eighth grade writing," the authors write. "Third grade," Graham reportedly shot back. "I can get an affidavit tomorrow saying the world is flat."

 

 


 

It was a f’n coup

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

 

 don't know what you're saying but it appears that you're talking to yourself, lol....

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that certain posters on here continue their relentless obsession with a man who hasn’t been in office in a year and half, who holds no current office, who has no legislative authority, and who can’t be elected again for over two years (if he even chooses to) is proof of just how paranoid these nitwits are that he’ll indeed run again…and win. If you REALLY thought he was that big of a fool, would you spend every waking moment living in such total panic? Or would you instead be doing a victory lap spouting all the great things that by now would have surely come to pass under the expert steadying and veteran leadership of his successor? Hmmmm?

Edited by SoCal Deek
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TDS is real and permanent.  They'll be talking about him for years to come, as they try to convince themselves that he was worse than the complete disaster who replaced him in one of the most insecure elections ever where many otherwise intelligent people voted based on feelz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

The fact that certain posters on here continue their relentless obsession with a man who hasn’t been in office in a year and half, who holds no current office, who has no legislative authority, and who can’t be elected again for over two years (if he even chooses to) is proof of just how paranoid these nitwits are that he’ll indeed run again…and win. If you REALLY thought he was that big of a fool, would you spend every waking moment living in such total panic? Or would you instead be doing a victory lap spouting all the great things that by now would have surely come to pass under the expert steadying and veteran leadership of his successor? Hmmmm?


The most insecure poster on this board is pouting because he refuses to leverage existing functionality to actually block his big bad boogeyman.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

14 minutes ago, Doc said:

TDS is real and permanent.  They'll be talking about him for years to come, as they try to convince themselves that he was worse than the complete disaster who replaced him in one of the most insecure elections ever where many otherwise intelligent people voted based on feelz.


I feelz you.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.799cc87597f1dd8d5b8eca4c3cbd518c.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


The most insecure poster on this board is pouting because he refuses to leverage existing functionality to actually block his big bad boogeyman.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg


I feelz you.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.799cc87597f1dd8d5b8eca4c3cbd518c.jpeg

I have no idea what you think that photo of President Trump shows, but you seem totally fixated on it. Care to elaborate? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Stormy was cutting him a check for $3hundo-k last I heard? 

 

Nothing like a predator assaulting women and be awarded money for his bad behavior.

 

So on brand for you Leo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Nothing like a predator assaulting women and be awarded money for his bad behavior.

 

So on brand for you Leo

Stormy Daniels is not a victim, she’s a business person selling a product.  She saddled up with Avenatti which, it turned out, was almost pathologically dunderheaded.   When that went south, she decided to forge ahead and roll the bones.  Unfortunately for her, it turned out Trump was actually the aggrieved party.  Justice served is Justice realized. 
 

I’m not keeping score, but Billsy, has there been a subject you hitched your wagon to where the hero of your tale actually prevails?  
 

You’re 0-for-everything.   I’d bet if you asked if she was happy you were on Team Stormy, she’d look at your track record and think “Keep that jinx far away from me!”. 
 

Then again, maybe the Freemasons got to the judge?   Yeah, that’s probs it. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Stormy Daniels is not a victim, she’s a business person selling a product.  She saddled up with Avenatti which, it turned out, was almost pathologically dunderheaded.   When that went south, she decided to forge ahead and roll the bones.  Unfortunately for her, it turned out Trump was actually the aggrieved party.  Justice served is Justice realized. 
 

I’m not keeping score, but Billsy, has there been a subject you hitched your wagon to where the hero of your tale actually prevails?  
 

You’re 0-for-everything.   I’d bet if you asked if she was happy you were on Team Stormy, she’d look at your track record and think “Keep that jinx far away from me!”. 
 

Then again, maybe the Freemasons got to the judge?   Yeah, that’s probs it. 

 

Here is the only win you got bro:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.13def729aa44434f6f26424962449f8d.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Here is the only win you got bro:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.13def729aa44434f6f26424962449f8d.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

So run with this then if it’s your kink!  At least you don’t look foolish pining for hidden messages in unredacted sections of Mueller.  Or riding Geo Conways jock on a prosecutor who quit—quit—when his boss informed him he was off base.

 

We agree. Trump lost the election. We agree Trump was impeached.   We agree he was a one term president thus far.

Since we both agree, we both win here—it’s like T ball. 
 

 

We agree he lost the popular vote, but while that’s relevant in the world of prom queens and County Fair Milkmaid contests, it’s irrelevant in presidential elections.  See, even when you choose a winning point, you have a way of really gumming things up with irrelevant information like this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

So run with this then if it’s your kink!  At least you don’t look foolish pining for hidden messages in unredacted sections of Mueller.  Or riding Geo Conways jock on a prosecutor who quit—quit—when his boss informed him he was off base.

 

We agree. Trump lost the election. We agree Trump was impeached.   We agree he was a one term president thus far.

Since we both agree, we both win here—it’s like T ball. 
 

 

We agree he lost the popular vote, but while that’s relevant in the world of prom queens and County Fair Milkmaid contests, it’s irrelevant in presidential elections.  See, even when you choose a winning point, you have a way of really gumming things up with irrelevant information like this.  

 

Kink...jock...queens... milkmaid... gumming

 

giphy.gif

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...