Jump to content

Creepy “Pedo” Joe just can’t resist his dark urges!


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Yeah, ok...

 

image.thumb.jpeg.e05f855733a3521a93cfb62634a3724d.jpeg

 

Was Biden sued for raping 13 year old girls, too?  Or known to party with known predators?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.80409fd468b8b6a46e5cc7522ef03a67.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

Wrong thread.

 

@BillStime  King of the Whataboutists strikes again.  Damn I'm having a hard time keeping up with this.  

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Why don't you ask the woman who is trying to get Trump's DNA right now?

 

And why didn't the woman who accused Biden sue him?

 

How long they been working on that DNA?  

 

Why didn't the woman sue Biden?  You may want to ask her and her bank account. 

Edited by Chef Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

I'm not defending any of them - I've made it clear - no one is above the law. 

 

However, you demonstrate daily that TRUMP is above the law and an absolute saint.

 

 

 

 

You don’t really make it clear at all, not at all. 
 

But, some folks have blinders on.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

If Biden raped a woman or abused a child - he should be in jail - not the WH.


Good stuff—Joe has to “rape” before you would exclude him from the WH.  We know he abused women, of course, that ship sailed and you were perfectly fine with it.  

 

 

You made a value judgment when you voted for Biden—choosing to disregard his obvious peccadilloes—the ones generations before saw, considered and laughed him out of the several races he entered back prior to 2020. .  
 

You chose his racist rhetoric that dates back decades, his abhorrent record of legislation that targeted black citizens (not that they are black enough to be Biden black), and his very peculiar and assaultive means of—according to Biden—making people comfortable with him which includes dicey language, intimately close  pelvis on pelvis contact, you chose his lifetime of pay for play and bringing his family along for the free ride.  
 

With respect to assault, you and those who voted like you chose to ignore his time as chief towel snapper with Sens Kennedy and the like and the very public accusation of serious sexual assault by a person who volunteered to work on his behalf. 
 

Your stand is admirable and noble only when considered and viewed under the weakest microscope imaginable.  
 

But maybe it’s  fun to be selective with the moral outrage.  
 

 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You made a value judgment when you voted for Biden—choosing to disregard his obvious peccadilloes—the ones generations before saw, considered and laughed him out of the several races he entered back prior to 2020. .  
 

You chose his racist rhetoric that dates back decades, his abhorrent record of legislation that targeted black citizens (not that they are black enough to be Biden black), and his very peculiar and assaultive means of—according to Biden—making people comfortable with him which includes dicey language, intimately close  pelvis on pelvis contact, you chose his lifetime of pay for play and bringing his family along for the free ride.  
 

With respect to assault, you and those who voted like you chose to ignore his time as chief towel snapper with Sens Kennedy and the like and the very public accusation of serious sexual assault by a person who volunteered to work on his behalf. 
 

Your stand is admirable and noble only when considered and viewed under the weakest microscope imaginable.  
 

But maybe it’s  fun to be selective with the moral outrage.  
 

 


Are you serious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Or sexual assault up to rape if your boy is running, apparently. 
 

 


How many time has Trump been accused and sued for sexual assault and rape?

 

How many times did Trump cheat on all of his wives? How many kids with different women?

 

How many times did a 13 year old sue Trumps a$$?

 

Trump would fk his own daughter if he could.

 

How many Epstein parties did Trump host at Mar-a-Lago?

 

Are we really going to play this game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

To you it's a game..................to adults is a serious business.

 

You spin the same bullsh*t every week.

 

No 13 year old sued Trump, you worded it that way to incite a reaction.

 

That lie about his daughter, is again just you twisting Trump's decades old remark about dating women who looked like her. You look foolish every time you say it

 

Trump hosted ZERO parties for Epstein (as you know) Epstein went to one party as a guest.........that's it.

 

 

Don't bother replying evry one on the board knows exactly what you will say.

 

 

 

 

 

LMAO - still spouting feels?  That's all you got... cause history is NOT on your side when it comes to Trump.

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


How many time has Trump been accused and sued for sexual assault and rape?

 

How many times did Trump cheat on all of his wives? How many kids with different women?

 

How many times did a 13 year old sue Trumps a$$?

 

Trump would fk his own daughter if he could.

 

How many Epstein parties did Trump host at Mar-a-Lago?

 

Are we really going to play this game?

I’m not sure what game you’re referring to.  You’re an acknowledged, all-in Biden supporter perfectly comfortable with the sexual assault he has admitted to, ok with the violent sexual assault he’s accused of and that his own Vice President believes occurred, apparently because he was able to not actually rape any women.  
 

When asked about it, you get all jittery and start rambling on about Trump.   
 

It’s weird. 
 

 

47 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

To you it's a game..................to adults is a serious business.

 

You spin the same bullsh*t every week.

 

No 13 year old sued Trump, you worded it that way to incite a reaction.

 

That lie about his daughter, is again just you twisting Trump's decades old remark about dating women who looked like her. You look foolish every time you say it

 

Trump hosted ZERO parties for Epstein (as you know) Epstein went to one party as a guest.........that's it.

 

 

Don't bother replying evry one on the board knows exactly what you will say.

 

 

 

 

He goes to some dark places for sure. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I’m not sure what game you’re referring to.  You’re an acknowledged, all-in Biden supporter perfectly comfortable with the sexual assault he has admitted to, ok with the violent sexual assault he’s accused of and that his own Vice President believes occurred, apparently because he was able to not actually rape any women.  
 

When asked about it, you get all jittery and start rambling on about Trump.   
 

It’s weird. 
 

 

He goes to some dark places for sure. 

 

Should Donald Trump give up his DNA for his rape case?  Yes or No?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Should Donald Trump give up his DNA for his rape case?  Yes or No?

 

 


 

Annnnd the Billstime tap out right on time.  
 

Help me out here on your rape case, Perry Mason.  I don’t know what you’re talking about, so bring me up to date. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:


 

Annnnd the Billstime tap out right on time.  
 

Help me out here on your rape case, Perry Mason.  I don’t know what you’re talking about, so bring me up to date. 
 

 


Go do your research and get back to us on why Trump is in court right now fighting to relinquish his dna.

 

And while you’re at it - please source all of the VIOLNT sexual assault Biden ADMITTED to and was sued over…

 

Hustle 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Go do your research and get back to us on why Trump is in court right now fighting to relinquish his dna.

 

And while you’re at it - please source all of the VIOLNT sexual assault Biden ADMITTED to and was sued over…

 

Hustle 

 

 


In court right now?  I’m going get you a watch to match your thread GPS. We’re gonna make you an adult before you know it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Go do your research and get back to us on why Trump is in court right now fighting to relinquish his dna.

 

And while you’re at it - please source all of the VIOLNT sexual assault Biden ADMITTED to and was sued over…

 

Hustle 

 

 

I won’t do any research on your allegation that Trump is fighting to relinquish his DNA, mostly because this is gibberish. 
 

On the bright side, the gibberish in that paragraph was the high point intellectually for this post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I won’t do any research on your allegation that Trump is fighting to relinquish his DNA, mostly because this is gibberish. 
 

On the bright side, the gibberish in that paragraph was the high point intellectually for this post. 


Oh - does it not your help argument?

 

Also - you couldn’t post any links highlighting all of the sexual assault Biden admitted to?

 

Really?

 

Why so jittery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BillStime said:


Oh - does it not your help argument?

 

Also - you couldn’t post any links highlighting all of the sexual assault Biden admitted to?

 

Really?

 

Why so jittery?

I don’t have an argument—there’s none to be had. 
 

 I simply pointed out your support for Biden in spite of his well-documented issues.  Your response in defense of Biden was “Trump”, then “Trump rape case”, then “Trump fighting to relinquish his DNA” and now something about my “help argument”. 
 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I don’t have an argument—there’s none to be had. 
 

 I simply pointed out your support for Biden in spite of his well-documented issues.  Your response in defense of Biden was “Trump”, then “Trump rape case”, then “Trump fighting to relinquish his DNA” and now something about my “help argument”. 
 


 

 

 

So well documented you can’t even provide links to all of the Biden accusers and his admission of guilt.

 

And no - I don’t loiter in right wing conspiracies because that’s all your party can run on.


Sad

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

The left gave up all moral high ground with Bill Clinton.  Any talk about any Repub being a lech is hypocrisy.

 

Complains the left still talks about TRUMP

 

Brings up CLINTON

 

leonardo-dicaprio-laughing.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 716er said:

Complains the left still talks about TRUMP

 

Brings up CLINTON

 

leonardo-dicaprio-laughing.jpg

 

Despite your attempt to deflect, the point I made is 100% correct.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 716er said:

In your warped mind, of course.

 

No, in any sane person's mind.  Bill was a lech 30 years ago.  That's how long ago the left lost their high ground.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, B-Man said:

Okay, I agree, back to the thread subject.

 

Whose "touchiness" with woman has been discussed in DC for decades.

 

 

ashton-carter-makes-remarks-after-he-was            maxresdefault.jpg

Unknown. 
Undocumented. 
Photoshopped. 
There have been no allegations of inappropriate fondling, and Biden has never acknowledged same. 
Tara Reade does not exist.  

 

Vast Right Wing Conspiracies.  
 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Unknown. 
Undocumented. 
Photoshopped. 
There have been no allegations of inappropriate fondling, and Biden has never acknowledged same. 
Tara Reade does not exist.  

 

Vast Right Wing Conspiracies.  
 

 

 

Good point.  Grab 'em by the . . . never mind.  

On 6/9/2021 at 8:33 AM, Doc said:

The left gave up all moral high ground with Bill Clinton.  Any talk about any Repub being a lech is hypocrisy.

 

So, bottom line time.  A Democrat did something reprehensible over 20 years ago, so Matt Gaetz and everyone else registered in a rival political party gets a free pass to do similarly reprehensible things.  Makes. Perfect. Sense.  There you go again with your HCQ logic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Good point.  Grab 'em by the . . . never mind.  

 

So, bottom line time.  A Democrat did something reprehensible over 20 years ago, so Matt Gaetz and everyone else registered in a rival political party gets a free pass to do similarly reprehensible things.  Makes. Perfect. Sense.  There you go again with your HCQ logic.  

Ah, this is the old another guy is worse then my guy shtick, a game already run by others.  Boring. 
 

You always struck me as an honest stakeholder in this game we play.  
 

Do you think there is any truth to the rumor that some people—in this case female, allow wealthy/powerful/celebrity individuals—in this case men, access to areas normally covered by traditional swimwear (let’s leave the French out of it) for the purpose of sexual gratification?  
 

I’m going out on a limb here and saying I think there may be some validity to this rumor.  
 

Of course, I wanted feedback from other sources so I spoke with friends from different backgrounds, with different upbringings, different political philosophies but did so in person as opposed to the internet where it’s relatively easy to make an inane argument that when someone bragging to someone in private about women letting him grab them is akin to sexual assault.  To a person, all have acknowledged that the rumor is likely true.  
 

What say you S3, do women ever allow men to take such liberties?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

So, bottom line time.  A Democrat did something reprehensible over 20 years ago, so Matt Gaetz and everyone else registered in a rival political party gets a free pass to do similarly reprehensible things.  Makes. Perfect. Sense.  There you go again with your HCQ logic.  

 

Not even close to what I've been saying.  I said that the left lost their moral high ground on sexual predators 30 years ago with Slick.  And it continues with other Dems to this very day as well, as well as Repubs.  But I've also been saying that anyone breaking the law should get what's coming to them, and that includes Gaetz.  Now let's see what, if any, charges there are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Not even close to what I've been saying.  I said that the left lost their moral high ground on sexual predators 30 years ago with Slick.  And it continues with other Dems to this very day as well, as well as Repubs.  But I've also been saying that anyone breaking the law should get what's coming to them, and that includes Gaetz.  Now let's see what, if any, charges there are.

 

More HCQ logic here.  Some guy who is registered in the same political party as me did something reprehensible 20 years ago, and I had absolutely nothing to do with that misconduct.  But because of that registration, I, as part of the “left,” have no moral high ground to say that anyone who is not a member of said political party has engaged in reprehensible behavior.  

 

If only that was the end of the stupid logic.  Now, it is implied that the sitting president is a pedophile based on what I understand to be anecdotal illustrations in which he is a bit too touchy with people by prevailing norms.  How that translates to pedophile is beyond me, but then again, we are dealing with people who follow the Q and who practice HCQ logic.  

 

On 6/9/2021 at 10:45 AM, B-Man said:

Okay, I agree, back to the thread subject.

 

Whose "touchiness" with woman has been discussed in DC for decades.

 

 

ashton-carter-makes-remarks-after-he-was            maxresdefault.jpg

 

People of Praise called.  They agree with you.  Have a nice day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

 

More HCQ logic here.  Some guy who is registered in the same political party as me did something reprehensible 20 years ago, and I had absolutely nothing to do with that misconduct.  But because of that registration, I, as part of the “left,” have no moral high ground to say that anyone who is not a member of said political party has engaged in reprehensible behavior.  

 

If only that was the end of the stupid logic.  Now, it is implied that the sitting president is a pedophile based on what I understand to be anecdotal illustrations in which he is a bit too touchy with people by prevailing norms.  How that translates to pedophile is beyond me, but then again, we are dealing with people who follow the Q and who practice HCQ logic.  


Just admit you’re too stupid to understand things. It would save everybody a hell of a lot of time.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...