Jump to content

The Lincoln Project


Recommended Posts

On 8/13/2021 at 6:46 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

No it’s not. Why? Are they bad at politics?

 

good question you ask, seriously wondering the answer 

What is your question?


The Lincoln Project members wrote every single ad for every single Republican candidate you’ve voted for in your lifetime.

 

The reason they’re so effective is because they know how to move/trigger conservatives and moderates with SHOCK ads.

 

Democrats are only good at making positive ads, since that’s what Democratic voters respond to.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Governor said:

What is your question?


The Lincoln Project members wrote every single ad for every single Republican candidate you’ve voted for in your lifetime.

 

The reason they’re so effective is because they know how to move/trigger conservatives and moderates with SHOCK ads.

 

Democrats are only good at making positive ads, since that’s what Democratic voters respond to.

Ha! You clearly haven’t seen the DNC ads they’re running for Newsom out here in california.😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Governor said:

The Lincoln Project members wrote every single ad for every single Republican candidate you’ve voted for in your lifetime.

 

Then they haven’t been very busy 

4 minutes ago, Governor said:

 

 

Democrats are only good at making positive ads, since that’s what Democratic voters respond to.

Naive post of the week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Then they haven’t been very busy 

Naive post of the week

There’s a huge market for non-cult members and moderates and they found that niche and ran with it.

 

If and when the GOP rebuilds, they will be making all of your ads again.

 

Just take a look at the members. It’s all your people.

9 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Ha! You clearly haven’t seen the DNC ads they’re running for Newsom out here in california.😂😂

I haven’t. Are they actually DNC ads or are they coming from a PAC? Big difference. PAC ads are usually negative and cheesy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Governor said:

There’s a huge market for non-cult members and moderates and they found that niche and ran with it.

 

If and when the GOP rebuilds, they will be making all of your ads again.

 

Just take a look at the members. It’s all your people.

 

Keep in mind Gov - you're kibitzing with an "independent"

 

lmao

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillStime said:

 

Keep in mind Gov - you're kibitzing with an "independent"

 

lmao

 

 

Ya right! I figured out who he was on the first day. 
 

Hey, why are there so many independents now? Oh, that’s why. Lol.

 

They want to pretend they weren’t all in with Trump.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Governor said:

Ya right! I figured out who he was on the first day. 
 

Hey, why are there so many independents now? Oh, that’s why. Lol.

 

They want to pretend they weren’t all in with Trump.

I imagine there will be quite a few more independents before the 2024 election with all the biden voter regret going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

“We believe Joe Biden has the character, experience, and temperament to lead this nation. We believe he will restore the dignity of the presidency, bring Americans together, reassert America’s role as a global leader, and inspire our nation to live up to its ideals.”

 

-- The Lincoln Project

 

 

All you need to know about their expertise.

 

They had dealt with Joe for 50 years, and they still wrote this.

 

😆

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Governor said:

Ya right! I figured out who he was on the first day. 
 

Hey, why are there so many independents now? Oh, that’s why. Lol.

 

They want to pretend they weren’t all in with Trump.

😂

 

I understand mindless sheep need to see the world as herds of sheep… their own or rival flocks.  Unfathomable that you could form your own values and opinions INDEPENDENTLY….  
 

I’ve backed democrats and republicans depending on the situation at the time, but I consider the two party system and both unmoderated parties to believe in a number of ideals I do not support. balance of power is most important, imo. 

 

At present your puppet masters have lost their mind and have all the control. The thing that makes the dems a little worse is they want more incompetent corrupt government control over everything and everyone and to steal more of my money to give to you.

 

Both political factions love simpleton DEPENDENTS like you because you are a harmless lemming to their agenda. 
 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

😂

 

I understand mindless sheep need to see the world as herds of sheep… their own or rival flocks.  Unfathomable that you could form your own values and opinions INDEPENDENTLY….  
 

I’ve backed democrats and republicans depending on the situation at the time, but I consider the two party system and both unmoderated parties to believe in a number of ideals I do not support. balance of power is most important, imo. 

 

At present your puppet masters have lost their mind and have all the control. The thing that makes the dems a little worse is they want more incompetent corrupt government control over everything and everyone and to steal more of my money to give to you.

 

Both political factions love simpleton DEPENDENTS like you because you are a harmless lemming to their agenda. 
 

 

I don’t like balance of power. I’d rather see a party have enough power to actually show us what they got, and if it sucks, voters will replace them and change it back.

 

Otherwise, you end up with a party running on things they know they can’t possibly deliver, like repealing the ACA, raising or lowering taxes, etc.

 

Balance gives you the status quo.

 

If you vote for one party and then vote for the other for Governor, then fine, but it still gets you nowhere in the end.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Governor said:

I don’t like balance of power. I’d rather see a party have enough power to actually show us what they got, and if it sucks, voters will replace them and change it back.

 

Otherwise, you end up with a party running on things they know they can’t possibly deliver, like repealing the ACA, raising or lowering taxes, etc.

 

Balance gives you the status quo.

 

If you vote for one party and then vote for the other for Governor, then fine, but it still gets you nowhere in the end.

 

 


That’s exactly what Putin said. He likes the way you think. 


It’s really sweet… and cute and very naive to believe what you do. 
 

the first thing autocrats do when they get power is make sure they don’t lose power silly ..

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


That’s exactly what Putin said. He likes the way you think. 

It’s really sweet… and cute. 
 

the first thing autocrats do when they get power is make sure they don’t lose power silly ..

That didn’t work for Trump. The checks and balances, courts, etc. held and the institutions survived. I don’t mean 1 party rule across the board. I mean less gridlock in Congress, because that’s the main reason why Congress always has a 15 percent approval rating. I would abolish the senate altogether and add house seats.

Edited by Governor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Because there was a balance of power silly.
 

You just made the point…

You’d be better off admitting that you’re a far right conservative and you enjoy gridlock because it prevents change and progress in any direction. You like the status quo. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Governor said:

You’d be better off admitting that you’re a far right conservative and you enjoy gridlock because it prevents change and progress in any direction. You like the status quo. 


it’s only gridlock because the politicians aren’t allowed to advance the things most people agree on because the ruling oligarchs command no compromise.
 

Gridlock is a symptom of the problem of the career politicians, money and corruption in the federal political system and a two party oligarchy, not a problem of balanced power and representation. 
 

Society should be able to progress without the federal government needing to be the Shepard to herd everyone there. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


it’s only gridlock because the politicians aren’t allowed to advance the things most people agree on because the ruling oligarchs command no compromise.
 

Gridlock is a symptom of the problem of the career politicians, money and corruption in the federal political system and a two party oligarchy, not a problem of balanced power and representation. 
 

Society should be able to progress without the federal government needing to be the Shepard to herd everyone there. 

Well, the senate is the “elitist” check on the people’s wishes.

 

You can’t support the filibuster and also support term limits.

 

The filibuster gives members cover and they can then serve for decades without ever taking a deciding vote. That’s the only reason it’s there.

 

The only reason why Trump-care got so many GOP votes is because they knew McCain was going to kill it. It allowed them to vote for something that they knew would never pass to save themselves from political fallout down the road.

 

It works the other way also. It’s easy for me to vote against something in a swing state when I already know it’s going to pass.

 

That’s not a functioning body. The joke is on us!

Edited by Governor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Disgusting question… but you should ask Donald Trump, Matt Gaetz, Gym Jordan, Roy Moore, and the rest of the Gang of Pedophiles for their thoughts.

 

https://thedailyedge.substack.com/p/gop-gang-of-pedophiles

I’m asking you, since you seem to always quote them. They have a history of molesting kids and you have a history of defending them. 
Don't give me whatabouts. Why do you defend pedophiles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bidens_basement said:

I’m asking you, since you seem to always quote them. They have a history of molesting kids and you have a history of defending them. 
Don't give me whatabouts. Why do you defend pedophiles?

 

Give us the list of the Lincoln Project charged and convicted of molesting kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ALF said:

 

Give us the list of the Lincoln Project charged and convicted of molesting kids.

John Weaver and his staff as well as the msm all chose to look the other way and attack anyone who rightfully accused him. Are you one of those that defend him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bidens_basement said:

John Weaver and his staff as well as the msm all chose to look the other way and attack anyone who rightfully accused him. Are you one of those that defend him?

 

I would never defend anyone convicted or what Weaver was trying to do. Give a link to charges and convictions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Governor said:

Well, the senate is the “elitist” check on the people’s wishes.

 

You can’t support the filibuster and also support term limits.

 

The filibuster gives members cover and they can then serve for decades without ever taking a deciding vote. That’s the only reason it’s there.

 

The only reason why Trump-care got so many GOP votes is because they knew McCain was going to kill it. It allowed them to vote for something that they knew would never pass to save themselves from political fallout down the road.

 

It works the other way also. It’s easy for me to vote against something in a swing state when I already know it’s going to pass.

 

That’s not a functioning body. The joke is on us!


The filibuster is a recourse for a non representative government. Both parties have used it to block partisan agendas. 

 

Let’s put in term limits first, then I’m happy to talk about the filibuster. These lifer politicians are the epicenter of all the corruption. Once they get in power their sole focus is staying in power. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...