Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How does socialist social security lead to tyranny? How does making the population dependent on the government for income lead to tyranny- that’s your question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: How does making the population dependent on the government for income lead to tyranny- that’s your question? let the people go hungry and see how long the governmnent lasts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: let the people go hungry and see how long the governmnent lasts Decades… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Decades… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin That's my point, you screw up and let people starve and you end up with those types of governmnents, Socialist policies like Obamacare, medicare, social security just make us stronger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Just now, Tiberius said: That's my point, you screw up and let people starve and you end up with those types of governmnents, Socialist policies like Obamacare, medicare, social security just make us stronger you missed the point, Those types of governments were the ones that let people starve. They were 100% driven by socialist policies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said: you missed the point, Those types of governments were the ones that let people starve. They were 100% driven by socialist policies. Only tibs can argue against and for socialism in the same post. Good stuff. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: you missed the point, Those types of governments were the ones that let people starve. They were 100% driven by socialist policies. Those people could not vote, we are a democracy, very different 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Only tibs can argue against and for socialism in the same post. Good stuff. Too complicated for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Just now, Tiberius said: Those people could not vote, we are a democracy, very different Too complicated for you. Please elaborate then you clown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Please elaborate then you clown Ha ha, I have been, and you didn't understand. You are literally proving my point for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Just now, Tiberius said: Ha ha, I have been, and you didn't understand. You are literally proving my point for me You are a waste of keystrokes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 43 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Those people could not vote, we are a democracy, very different Wrong again https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_the_Soviet_Union#:~:text=The 1950 election would be,one final time as Premier. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Wrong again https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_the_Soviet_Union#:~:text=The 1950 election would be,one final time as Premier. Election in Soviet Union? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Election in Soviet Union? you know a lot of the world says the same about ours lately. I guess its only valid if CNN and NYT say so. eh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Election in Soviet Union? Is Wikipedia lying?? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 As the border crisis explodes, one thing’s grown crystal-clear, despite the lying Bidenites’ efforts to obfuscate: Their only priority is to admit every illegal migrant they can. The latest surrender: The administration is just letting everyone go in areas where holding facilities are overcrowded (how many aren’t, we wonder?), with a stern note telling them to report to some ICE office within a couple of months or maybe file an asylum claim by mail. These “mass releases” began before the end of Title 42 removed the last real restraint. They’re calling it “parole,” since “catch and release” doesn’t sound good on a press release. Why not just stop the line at the border until you have room? Only because waving everybody through is their goal. Or witness Homeland Security boss Alejandro Mayorkas’ pique after Texas National Guardsmen erected barbed wire to block one popular illegal-crossing spot: “I’m going to leave it to our Department of Justice to speak to the lawfulness, or lack thereof, of those actions,” he huffed. If he thought his job was to keep people from crossing illegally, a simple “Thanks!” would do. That he instead all but called it illegal shows the reverse and reveals the perverse priorities of this administration. This is why Mayorkas keeps insisting the border is “under control” — because for his purposes, it is. From the outset, this shady administration’s only goal has been to admit as many people as stealthily and speedily as possible, while avoiding the “bad optics” of migrants held in detention facilities or under bridges. They haven’t even got the courage to stand by their progressive principles of a completely open border. The dishonesty is at the root of President Joe Biden’s flacks bragging about how he’s achieved “the largest expansion of lawful pathways” to enter “in decades.” That’s because they are straining the laws to make it as easy as possible. Same for the complaints that this mess is only because Congress won’t pass “immigration reform.” What they mean is “mass legalization” to speed up the lines. Certainly not, say, toughening the rules for claiming asylum or enforcing a secure border. In fact, asylum provisions were never intended to allow the mass migration now under way. Yet the left has gradually twisted them into a license for end-running every other immigration statute. Time and time again, the Bidenites have insisted the law leaves them no choice. The truth is, they just don’t want to own up to the disaster they blindly pursued. https://nypost.com/2023/05/11/growing-crisis-proves-bidens-only-priority-is-to-admit-em-all/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 Ted Cruz is of course correct in schooling this commie activist reporter. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 joe bout to lose that vote lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 47 minutes ago, aristocrat said: joe bout to lose that vote lol And they're about to lose their voices. Elections have consequences. I'm sure none of them knew how terrible they would be though when they voted for Joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 12, 2023 Share Posted May 12, 2023 2 minutes ago, SCBills said: Funny, they didn’t want to tweet the part that they were being transferred to another hotel. Also ironic considering the GQP voted against a spending bill for veterans exposed to burn pits and currently wants to reduce spending on veterans by 22% You can’t make this up… 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts