Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Good for you.  I was wondering about that.  Hoax.  I don’t care about your BP. 

 

Ummm according to your suggestion that my waking people would be good for my BP it appears you do care.

 

Carry on confused bigotty troll.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

First, Epps instructed his commandos and the crowds at his attention to rush into the Capitol and let nothing stop them.

Second, Epps assiduously protected cops and law enforcement so no local or federal officers would be harmed during the precision breaches.

 

 

The video showing him walking this line is a clinic in gaslighting.

 

As Revolver notes:

 

January 6, after all, was scheduled as a Trump rally. In the 323 rallies before Trump took office, and the 168 rallies thereafter, there had never been a single instance of rioting or pre-planned illegal activity.

 

Lawbreaking was 0 for 491 at Trump rallies before January 6.

 

Perhaps this extraordinarily track record of physical restraint explains why Epps’s arrest-bait proposal stood out like a sore thumb, and why he was quickly shouted down.

 

But that above encounter was not the first time on January 5 that Epps held court in a crowded gathering, demanding everyone in earshot rush the Capitol the next day. In the following clip, from slightly earlier in the evening, Epps gives the same exact spiel, almost as if his lines were practiced and rehearsed. Note how Epps deploys the same preface of “I probably shouldn’t say this because I’ll probably get arrested” before making his same Capitol-invasion pitch, and delivers the same theatrical pause after “in” when he tells them: “We need to go in to the Capitol.”

 

 

https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

If indeed the Epps video and storyline is true then the Insurrection hoax is officially… OVER! 

 

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

☝️ 😄 🤩 😝

 

Now we KNOW who planted the pipe bombs - lmao

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

First, Epps instructed his commandos and the crowds at his attention to rush into the Capitol and let nothing stop them.

Second, Epps assiduously protected cops and law enforcement so no local or federal officers would be harmed during the precision breaches.

 

 

The video showing him walking this line is a clinic in gaslighting.

 

As Revolver notes:

 

January 6, after all, was scheduled as a Trump rally. In the 323 rallies before Trump took office, and the 168 rallies thereafter, there had never been a single instance of rioting or pre-planned illegal activity.

 

Lawbreaking was 0 for 491 at Trump rallies before January 6.

 

Perhaps this extraordinarily track record of physical restraint explains why Epps’s arrest-bait proposal stood out like a sore thumb, and why he was quickly shouted down.

 

But that above encounter was not the first time on January 5 that Epps held court in a crowded gathering, demanding everyone in earshot rush the Capitol the next day. In the following clip, from slightly earlier in the evening, Epps gives the same exact spiel, almost as if his lines were practiced and rehearsed. Note how Epps deploys the same preface of “I probably shouldn’t say this because I’ll probably get arrested” before making his same Capitol-invasion pitch, and delivers the same theatrical pause after “in” when he tells them: “We need to go in to the Capitol.”

 

 

https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

 

 

 

I'm certain the committee will spend a lot of time on addressing questions to law enforcement and request Mr. Epps' personal testimony on the events of the day and his involvement.  NOT.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I love confessions 

 


14A Section 3 all of these seditious 

 

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress…or hold any office under the United States or any State who … shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against [the Constitution].”


More confessions… and fear:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have stated from the begining if they entered the capitol without permission you can charge them but this "investigation" with it's clearly predetermined outcome is only to please the stupid. If they wanted answers they would need to know what the FBI was told and did that did. I know they were present but were they instigator? In 2015 I would not believe it but after the whole Steele Dossier debacle there is not much I would state is beyond them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...