Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

 

 

Politico Poll Shows No One Listening to Rigged January 6 Committee

 

By JOHN NOLTE

 

In October 2021, 67 percent of Republicans said Donald Trump “should run” for president again in 2024. Today, 66 percent say the same.

 

Put another way: the Rigged Kangaroo Court Known As The January 6 Committee, is a total flop.

 

“Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s vivid testimony last month to the select House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack was the latest to shake Washington, but much like the panel’s other public hearings,” Morning Consult reports, “it appears to have done little to change Americans’ minds about another presidential bid by Donald Trump, according to a new Morning Consult/Politico survey.”

 

Yes, that’s a poll from Morning Consult and the left-wing Politico. Can you imagine the heartache over there?

 

https://morningconsult.com/2022/07/12/jan-6-hearings-voters-trump-gop-standing/

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/12/nolte-politico-poll-shows-no-one-listening-to-rigged-january-6-committee/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Politico Poll Shows No One Listening to Rigged January 6 Committee

 

By JOHN NOLTE

 

In October 2021, 67 percent of Republicans said Donald Trump “should run” for president again in 2024. Today, 66 percent say the same.

 

Put another way: the Rigged Kangaroo Court Known As The January 6 Committee, is a total flop.

 

“Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s vivid testimony last month to the select House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack was the latest to shake Washington, but much like the panel’s other public hearings,” Morning Consult reports, “it appears to have done little to change Americans’ minds about another presidential bid by Donald Trump, according to a new Morning Consult/Politico survey.”

 

Yes, that’s a poll from Morning Consult and the left-wing Politico. Can you imagine the heartache over there?

 

https://morningconsult.com/2022/07/12/jan-6-hearings-voters-trump-gop-standing/

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/12/nolte-politico-poll-shows-no-one-listening-to-rigged-january-6-committee/

 

 

 

No one is listening but Bannon and your Oath Keeper friends want to testify LIVE?

 

Can you make up your minds?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

lolz

 

 

Why would the committee call either of these witnesses to provide on-the-record testimony that would refute and contradict the second hand hearsay testimony of their "star" witness?  This Spiro person must be mentally S L O W not to be able to understand that and another run of the mill deep state harlot.    

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Why would the committee call either of these witnesses to provide on-the-record testimony that would refute and contradict the second hand hearsay testimony of their "star" witness?  This Spiro person must be mentally S L O W not to be able to understand that.    

 

Oh, or it because there was enough collaboration that the Trump/Secret Service guy had credibility issues and the story was verified by others... hence why @B-Man hasn't produced any more thoughts from REDSTATE.

 

And then there is this from just last week:

 

Secret Service Director James Murray to step down, head to Snap

Murray has faced criticism for approving Anthony Ornato, a senior Secret Service official, as a political adviser in the Trump White House.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the purpose of these hearings? I mean, what kind of endgame are these people looking for? Seems like a big waste of time... at this point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, T&C said:

What is the purpose of these hearings? I mean, what kind of endgame are these people looking for? Seems like a big waste of time... at this point in time.

 

To understand what happened that lead to the events of January 6th and make it clear to the nation who was responsible.

 

Considering that they have sworn testimony from almost everyone in the upper echelon of the Trump admin, campaign, and DoJ that the election was not stolen, but people today still believe it and we even have candidates running on that complete BS, I feel like it's a good idea to keep hammering that point home as well.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

To understand what happened that lead to the events of January 6th and make it clear to the nation who was responsible.

 

Considering that they have sworn testimony from almost everyone in the upper echelon of the Trump admin, campaign, and DoJ that the election was not stolen, but people today still believe it and we even have candidates running on that complete BS, I feel like it's a good idea to keep hammering that point home as well.

We know what happened, there was a rigged and fraudulent election that took place in November 2020. That's what lead to the protest. We didn't need this politicized circus to understand that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

We know what happened, there was a rigged and fraudulent election that took place in November 2020. That's what lead to the protest. We didn't need this politicized circus to understand that.

 

No there wasn't.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

To understand what happened that lead to the events of January 6th and make it clear to the nation who was responsible.

 

Considering that they have sworn testimony from almost everyone in the upper echelon of the Trump admin, campaign, and DoJ that the election was not stolen, but people today still believe it and we even have candidates running on that complete BS, I feel like it's a good idea to keep hammering that point home as well.

Has it never occurred to you that January 6th was a set up? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

To understand what happened that lead to the events of January 6th and make it clear to the nation who was responsible.

 

Considering that they have sworn testimony from almost everyone in the upper echelon of the Trump admin, campaign, and DoJ that the election was not stolen, but people today still believe it and we even have candidates running on that complete BS, I feel like it's a good idea to keep hammering that point home as well.

I don't know anyone who gives a crap about this anymore... everyone is more concerned with the price of gas and groceries, stuff like that. The border too... but not this. Just seems like a waste of money and time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Why would the committee call either of these witnesses to provide on-the-record testimony that would refute and contradict the second hand hearsay testimony of their "star" witness?  This Spiro person must be mentally S L O W not to be able to understand that and another run of the mill deep state harlot.    

 

What was the purpose of that tweet?  Aren't they still willing to testify that what happened, when they were the only other people in the car, wasn't what Vindwoman claimed based on hearsay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

No there wasn't.

Yes there was. Swing states were flooded with unrequested and unverifiable paper ballots. The “ need “ for this was pushed by the Dems immediately after the emergence of Sars2. They knew Trump was on a collision course to overwhelming victory in November of 2020 and were determined to cheat to stop it. It’s pretty obvious and not hard to figure out. The fact the ballots were unverifiable was their built in excise - there is no evidence! Even though stuffing the ballot box is one of the oldest trucks of all time. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:

Yes there was. Swing states were flooded with unrequested and unverifiable paper ballots. The “ need “ for this was pushed by the Dems immediately after the emergence of Sars2. They knew Trump was on a collision course to overwhelming victory in November of 2020 and were determined to cheat to stop it. It’s pretty obvious and not hard to figure out. The fact the ballots were unverifiable was their built in excise - there is no evidence! Even though stuffing the ballot box is one of the oldest trucks of all time. 

 

All of this is BS.

 

We now have sworn testimony that these claims were investigated and found to be without merit by Trump's DoJ, Trump's campaign, and Trump's White House lawyers.

 

If you still believe this, then are you saying that all of those people, whose jobs counted on Trump winning, committed perjury by saying that he did not win? That, for some reason, they decided to lie under oath that they had investigated the fraud claims and found them to be baseless?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boatdrinks said:

Yes there was. Swing states were flooded with unrequested and unverifiable paper ballots. The “ need “ for this was pushed by the Dems immediately after the emergence of Sars2. They knew Trump was on a collision course to overwhelming victory in November of 2020 and were determined to cheat to stop it. It’s pretty obvious and not hard to figure out. The fact the ballots were unverifiable was their built in excise - there is no evidence! Even though stuffing the ballot box is one of the oldest trucks of all time. 

 

And none of the 60+ Trump campaign lawsuits could verify this conspiracy and get one realistic win in court?

 

Weird.

 

 

Edited by BillStime
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

All of this is BS.

 

We now have sworn testimony that these claims were investigated and found to be without merit by Trump's DoJ, Trump's campaign, and Trump's White House lawyers.

 

If you still believe this, then are you saying that all of those people, whose jobs counted on Trump winning, committed perjury by saying that he did not win? That, for some reason, they decided to lie under oath that they had investigated the fraud claims and found them to be baseless?

Perhaps some political creatures who want to stay in Washington at all costs would testify such things but that’s about it. None of this was ever investigated fully as the Dem establishment prevented anyone from actually doing so. Again , they’re excuse was built in - there is no “ evidence” . There’s plenty of evidence if you want to find it. The official line is repeated ad infinitum to dismiss it. Everyone knows the unverifiable unrequested paper ballots were used. It’s common knowledge- Cuomo and corrupt NYS were one of the first to allow it. Are you saying that none of this happened ? We all saw it and heard it when it was announced. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:

Perhaps some political creatures who want to stay in Washington at all costs would testify such things but that’s about it. None of this was ever investigated fully as the Dem establishment prevented anyone from actually doing so. Again , they’re excuse was built in - there is no “ evidence” . There’s plenty of evidence if you want to find it. The official line is repeated ad infinitum to dismiss it. Everyone knows the unverifiable unrequested paper ballots were used. It’s common knowledge- Cuomo and corrupt NYS were one of the first to allow it. Are you saying that none of this happened ? We all saw it and heard it when it was announced. 

Also we were left to believe that former Vice President Joe Biden received 81 MILLION votes. 81 MILLION. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Perhaps some political creatures who want to stay in Washington at all costs would testify such things but that’s about it. None of this was ever investigated fully as the Dem establishment prevented anyone from actually doing so. Again , they’re excuse was built in - there is no “ evidence” . There’s plenty of evidence if you want to find it. The official line is repeated ad infinitum to dismiss it. Everyone knows the unverifiable unrequested paper ballots were used. It’s common knowledge- Cuomo and corrupt NYS were one of the first to allow it. Are you saying that none of this happened ? We all saw it and heard it when it was announced. 

 

We have testimony from Bill Barr and his deputies that they investigated every claim of fraud that was raised and found them all to be without merit.

 

So is it your assertion that they were all committing perjury, or that somehow nobody raised the particular theory your are espousing to them?

 

Or is it that Trump's hand-picked DoJ leadership were secret Dem deep state globalist illuminati baby eaters?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

We have testimony from Bill Barr and his deputies that they investigated every claim of fraud that was raised and found them all to be without merit.

 

So is it your assertion that they were all committing perjury, or that somehow nobody raised the particular theory your are espousing to them?

 

Or is it that Trump's hand-picked DoJ leadership were secret Dem deep state globalist illuminati baby eaters?

I hear they taste of chicken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...