Jump to content

Final Vote—All States, Progress in counting


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


calm down and look at the lower left corner. What’s the temperature? 19 degrees. Was it 19 degrees at any time in Nov in Detroit? No.

 

So what’s up? This picture is from December 2019 and that law suit is settled.

 

The graphic, we found, as well as the report it came from, were real. However, the news segment aired not in November 2020, but in December 2019. The lawsuit referenced in the report was dropped by the plaintiff on July 1, 2020, after “remedial action” was taken by the city of Detroit


They’re also using voter registration numbers from prior to 11/3. WI allows same day registration that’s not reflected in their 3.6 million number they keep coming up with.

 

I was told voter fraud was rare and doesn't happen.  I was also told that it would never be big enough to influence an election.

 

Those both proved to be incorrect based on what happened in 2019.  Why wouldn't it happen again in a bigger scale in 2020?  Is it no coincidence that Detroit, Michigan is the place that is acting the most suspicious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Back2Buff said:

 

I was told voter fraud was rare and doesn't happen.  I was also told that it would never be big enough to influence an election.

 

Those both proved to be incorrect based on what happened in 2019.  Why wouldn't it happen again in a bigger scale in 2020?  Is it no coincidence that Detroit, Michigan is the place that is acting the most suspicious?

 

Is it no coincidence that the propaganda machine is using the same place in order to create a false pattern so folks like you get fooled into seeing it as a repeat instead of obvious manipulation?

 

Also, what happened in 2019? Nothing that was proven to be factual.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Back2Buff said:

 

I was told voter fraud was rare and doesn't happen.  I was also told that it would never be big enough to influence an election.

 

Those both proved to be incorrect based on what happened in 2019.  Why wouldn't it happen again in a bigger scale in 2020?  Is it no coincidence that Detroit, Michigan is the place that is acting the most suspicious?

Why suspicious? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Back2Buff said:

 

I was told voter fraud was rare and doesn't happen.  I was also told that it would never be big enough to influence an election.

 

Those both proved to be incorrect based on what happened in 2019.  Why wouldn't it happen again in a bigger scale in 2020?  Is it no coincidence that Detroit, Michigan is the place that is acting the most suspicious?


Where’s the voter fraud! There’s no evidence anyone of those registered people voted and the rolls were cleaned up as well. That happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Back2Buff said:

 

I was told voter fraud was rare and doesn't happen.  I was also told that it would never be big enough to influence an election.

 

Those both proved to be incorrect based on what happened in 2019.  Why wouldn't it happen again in a bigger scale in 2020?  Is it no coincidence that Detroit, Michigan is the place that is acting the most suspicious?

 

They're not acting "suspicious." They're counting votes that were legally cast. 


There is no evidence of voter fraud whatsoever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Where’s the voter fraud! There’s no evidence anyone of those registered people voted and the rolls were cleaned up as well. That happens all the time.

It's everywhere idiot, open you damn eyes! You're too stupid to not keep watching and believing left wing media!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jrober38 said:

 

 

It is baseless.

 

Republicans who did mail in vote did so from all over the state. Those vote collection stations were under less pressure, and have reported 98% of their vote in pretty much every situation.

 

The remaining vote is from urban areas where the collection stations were overwhelmed by mail in votes from democrats. As a result, the votes coming in are coming in 80-90% for democrats because democrats overwhelmingly live in cities like Philadelphia. 

 

Luckily for all Americans you're not in charge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

There are "irregularities" when comparing to prior elections. But nothing that is unexpected or inexplicable by anyone paying attention going into this election. Sure, they'll be double-checked, but yall can tone down your conspiracy theories.

 

I haven't posted anything conspiratorial on this.  Simply pointing out a relatively easy to spot example of a large irregularity and suggesting that it should be looked at.  For sure there will be some deep dives into some states and whoever wins should be declared the winner without doubt.  Let's count all votes and make sure they're all legal.   Trust but verify. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Big Gun said:

It's everywhere idiot, open you damn eyes! You're too stupid to not keep watching and believing left wing media!

sore loser (plural sore losers) (informal) One who complains or blames others for their loss; one who is easily angered by losing a game or contest, or because of some other misfortune or bad luck.
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

I haven't posted anything conspiratorial on this.  Simply pointing out a relatively easy to spot example of a large irregularity and suggesting that it should be looked at.  For sure there will be some deep dives into some states and whoever wins should be declared the winner without doubt.  Let's count all votes and make sure they're all legal.   Trust but verify. 

 

Agreed everything should always be double-checked.

 

If you were simply finding an easy example for discussions purposes, then fine. The problem is your counterparts are taking those examples as hard evidence and generating propaganda around it to create misinformation.

 

Let's get them counted! Im sure we're all crapping our pants waiting on the NV update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:
sore loser (plural sore losers) (informal) One who complains or blames others for their loss; one who is easily angered by losing a game or contest, or because of some other misfortune or bad luck.

Do you see the irony of you posting this when you spent the last four years doing the same thing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:
sore loser (plural sore losers) (informal) One who complains or blames others for their loss; one who is easily angered by losing a game or contest, or because of some other misfortune or bad luck.

 

you know what the silver lining is for this election? if biden wins you elected a guy who has done more to destroy minorities in modern american history.  so the four narrative of you calling everyone trumper a racist has now been flipped on to you.  congrats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aristocrat said:

 

you know what the silver lining is for this election? if biden wins you elected a guy who has done more to destroy minorities in modern american history.  so the four narrative of you calling everyone trumper a racist has now been flipped on to you.  congrats

 

I see we've made it to the "no, you are" stage. 🤣

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Big Gun said:

It's everywhere idiot, open you damn eyes! You're too stupid to not keep watching and believing left wing media!


sure it is. If we are just saying throw out votes based on conjecture, Trumps votes seem too high. We should probably throw out half of them. He did tell people to vote twice, so half of his vote is probably fraud.

 

Is that how this making things up works!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...