Jump to content

Democrat Convention 2020.


B-Man

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

A spell?  Now the Republicans are turning to blame magic and voodoo? 

The answer is that he's an excellent orator.  His speeches will be studied by future public speakers for decades.  

Obama is all hat and no cattle. His speeches may be studied but his nonexistent deeds won't. He'll go down in history as the most corrupt, lawless president the U.S. has ever had. My opinion (and many others) has nothing to do with the color of his skin but the color of his character. The only way he could get anything at all done while he was president was to do it in an underhanded way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

BLM or Burn Loot Maim is a Marxist organization, their own words, who want to burn everything down and start again, their words, not mine

 

So I take you you have never said the word communist, or Lenin, or Trump (because he wants to drain the swamp and start over).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Obama is all hat and no cattle. His speeches may be studied but his nonexistent deeds won't. He'll go down in history as the most corrupt, lawless president the U.S. has ever had. My opinion (and many others) has nothing to do with the color of his skin but the color of his character. The only way he could get anything at all done while he was president was to do it in an underhanded way. 

Most corrupt president?! Wow, that’s a hell of a claim.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Obama is all hat and no cattle. His speeches may be studied but his nonexistent deeds won't. He'll go down in history as the most corrupt, lawless president the U.S. has ever had. My opinion (and many others) has nothing to do with the color of his skin but the color of his character. The only way he could get anything at all done while he was president was to do it in an underhanded way. 

It’s content of character.  FYI.  If you’re going to channel MLK Jr. to support your thinly-veiled racism, at least do it right. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buftex said:

There may have been some expectation that a president "rides off into the sunset" at one time...but that was at a time when current presidents showed a modicum of respect for former presidents.  Trumpism has made all that kind of "presidential decorum" stuff obsolete...the black man is supposed be subservient and kiss the orange man's ass, while the orange man has done nothing but denigrate him, and his legacy, and his supporters?  Hell, orange man is so thin skinned, he steals credit for black man's achievement's whenever he sees fits..."nobody said it could be done..."  :) 

What accomplishments? The criticism of Obama has been for his do-nothing incompetence, not the color of his skin. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Obama is all hat and no cattle. His speeches may be studied but his nonexistent deeds won't. He'll go down in history as the most corrupt, lawless president the U.S. has ever had. My opinion (and many others) has nothing to do with the color of his skin but the color of his character. The only way he could get anything at all done while he was president was to do it in an underhanded way. 

 

Also, how does one study a non-existent deed?  Can it be studied if it doesn’t exist?  And, if so, how would I study this invisible thing?  

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

What accomplishments? The criticism of Obama has been for his do-nothing incompetence, not the color of his skin. 

ACA.  GM is alive.  Bin Laden is dead.  Climate change deal.  Net neutrality.  Environmental protection.  Did not bang porn star and then pay hush money to her.  Declined to suggest direct Lysol to lung application to fight pandemic.  Told truth.  Protected democracy from Trumper d-bags.  Actual winning. 

Edited by SectionC3
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

ONE OBAMA PHOTO SAYS IT ALL:

 

Former President Barack Obama took a gratuitous shot at his successor during Night Three of the Democratic National Condemnation for Trump’s alleged mis-use of the U.S. military. The Issues & Insights crew offers one that tells the whole truth about Obama’s attitude toward Americans in uniform.

 
 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

BLM or Burn Loot Maim is a Marxist organization, their own words, who want to burn everything down and start again, their words, not mine

"Black Lives Matter" is a terrorist organization closely linked to Antifa (an organization that has morphed from European terrorist groups of the 60's) and is no way related to "black lives matter". I have no problem stating that any race or creed matters. It looks like the Left is once again resorting to their old stand-by of using the race card. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

"Black Lives Matter" is a terrorist organization closely linked to Antifa (an organization that has morphed from European terrorist groups of the 60's) and is no way related to "black lives matter". I have no problem stating that any race or creed matters. It looks like the Left is once again resorting to their old stand-by of using the race card. 

And you still can’t say black lives matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

So no city has been burned to the ground?

 

\

 

Apparently you haven’t heard of the national emergency declaration to build the wall.  Or the executive order approach of the “Art of the Deal” president.  Sounds to me like presidential power is growing and Congressional power is diminishing.  Which is, you know, contrary to the Constitution and also anti-democratic.  So there’s that. 

 

Over-use of executive orders didn’t start with Trump.

And whenever he’s overreached, there’s been steady opposition from the other two branches. He hasn’t gotten away with anything that is beyond the scope of his power, or the usage of that power by any President before him. These are further proof of my point. 

 

Nice try.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Also, how does one study a non-existent deed?  Can it be studied if it doesn’t exist?  And, if so, how would I study this invisible thing?  

ACA.  GM is alive.  Bin Laden is dead.  Climate change deal.  Net neutrality.  Environmental protection.  Did not bang porn star and then pay hush money to her.  Declined to suggest direct Lysol to lung application to fight pandemic.  Told truth.  Protected democracy from Trumper d-bags.  Actual winning. 

That was the point. The ACA is an abject failure and the Left is trying to chuck what's left of it for Medicare for all. The GM fiasco was an illegal gift to Obama's supporters at the expense of shareholders. Climate change deal accomplished what? The rest of your nonsense would be thrown out of court. You make your profession not only look bad but sleazy. 

7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

And you still can’t say black lives matter. 

I certainly did state that, but didn't make it divisive like you are doing. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

Most corrupt president?! Wow, that’s a hell of a claim.


Well, when you lead a soft coup against the incoming administration, you get the mantel. Sedition is a helluva thing.

 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Well, when you lead a soft coup against the incoming administration, you get the mantel. Sedition is a helluva thing.

 

Based on who was coming in, some may not call that corrupt. Some may even called judicious. Corruption is the nepotism and blatant disregard for democracy that is occurring today. So, who is really The most corrupt?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

Most corrupt president?! Wow, that’s a hell of a claim.

What would you call using the entire IC to frame an opponent? He was so corrupt that he was willing to throw our country into political turmoil for his partisan purposes. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

What would you call using the entire IC to frame an opponent? He was so corrupt that he was willing to throw our country into political turmoil for his partisan purposes. 

Frame an opponent? Do you mean having another countries government dig into an email scandal? Or was it the time that someone had an alternate countries government dig into the background of an opponent son?Is that what you’re talking about?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MiltonWaddams said:

Based on who was coming in, some may not call that corrupt. Some may even called judicious. Corruption is the nepotism and blatant disregard for democracy that is occurring today. So, who is really The most corrupt?

Like the indiscriminate way the Left wants to flood our country with illegitimate mail-in ballots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:
17 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

So the most important thing trump has to do is ridicule the leader of a friendly country...are you serious...because she has to learn to take it....wow

The man is sick...

Ridicule Putin, laugh about his hair cut, or his false claim of a virus vaccine, but the Prime Minister of New Zealand...??

 

This is not about Biden, Harris, or anyone else...

Just trump. 

What kind of a person thinks this way. What kind of a leader do you want to live with...

I do not suggest Biden, Harris or Pence is the answer, but really! 

 

 

17 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

We will give you Trudeau for a bucket of pucks...or are you insisting that trump is part of the trade...

 

But Trump did not ridicule the Prime Minister of New Zealand, he merely stated a new cluster after 100 days of no cases was terrible, which it is. 

You have a thing about ridicule and disrespect. You are Canadian and conservative, and Trudeau is a liberal. You do not like Trudeau, or Trump.

My guess is you do not give a s*t about ideology or the US as long as Canada is "respected" and "taken care of" like your dairy industry. You want the US just to bend over and repeatedly take it up the a** from all our "former friends". But Trump won't bend to your liking, and you don't like that so you go to war in of all places a Buffalo Bills sub forum.

Face it, with your population size and land mass, you can not defend your country. If Russia, or China wants to use your northern passage or Arctic resources, who is to stop them? My guess is China will just eventually buy Canada like they are already doing in Africa.

Edited by Niagara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

Frame an opponent? Do you mean having another countries government dig into an email scandal? Or was it the time that someone had an alternate countries government dig into the background of an opponent son?Is that what you’re talking about?

It's obvious that you have little or no knowledge of the subject and are only relying on left wing made up talking points. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...