ChiGoose Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: So he just believes the tax return is real without any proof of authentication, and Maddow designs a whole show without any verification? The defamation lawsuit would be a slam dunk if it was not true. Here’s an idea: spend a couple minutes looking up something for yourself instead of asking people to do it for you. Also: the idea that there is a potential defamation suit with this is ridiculous. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, BillStime said: Yeah - Trump is a saint. I NEVER said that & will never say that but you are just a flat out hater period !! There were some things that he did that wasn't as bad as you say but you WILL NOT HAVE IT AT ALL . That is just watered pure & simple . I will & have always admitted when he's a ass but you on the other hand can't find 1 thing positive & yet you look at this POS that's in office now & blindly follow him no matter what & that is total 110 % Hypocrisy because it's in no way the same for both because of your bias/hatered for . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 6 minutes ago, BillStime said: What point was proved? You just keep digging and making yourself look pathetic as usual. As Chef Jim would say - carry on. lolz That leaks of Dems are investigated and the leaks that hurt Trump are not, what did you think you were responding to? 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said: Here’s an idea: spend a couple minutes looking up something for yourself instead of asking people to do it for you. Also: the idea that there is a potential defamation suit with this is ridiculous. Printing false derogatory information can cause you pay out money, that is simple. What information don't I know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 9 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: Printing false derogatory information can cause you pay out money, that is simple. What information don't I know? You are upset that Trump’s actual tax documents were leaked but also that leaking the actual documents is defamatory because they are fake? Or are you upset that there were fake documents that purported to be Trump’s tax returns but were defamatory because they were fake but also upset that there was no investigation into how someone obtained Trump’s actual tax documents (which were fake)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 10, 2023 Author Share Posted May 10, 2023 13 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: That leaks of Dems are investigated and the leaks that hurt Trump are not, what did you think you were responding to? You don’t even realize that you keep digging yourself into a hole Buffalo Timmy. Why didn’t the Republicans investigate this when they had control of the House AND Senate in 2017 and NOW? Btw - can you imagine if Obama didn’t release his taxes? How would Buffalo Timmy respond? I bet you were irate when he wore a brown suit, too. lmao 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 8 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: You are upset that Trump’s actual tax documents were leaked but also that leaking the actual documents is defamatory because they are fake? Or are you upset that there were fake documents that purported to be Trump’s tax returns but were defamatory because they were fake but also upset that there was no investigation into how someone obtained Trump’s actual tax documents (which were fake)? Your defense is that the journalist received the papers "innocently" which we know is false because a competent journalist would never run with something of that nature that is not confirmed. Once again a liberal says a clear lie about breaking the law but you agree to ignore it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, Orlando Tim said: Your defense is that the journalist received the papers "innocently" which we know is false because a competent journalist would never run with something of that nature that is not confirmed. Once again a liberal says a clear lie about breaking the law but you agree to ignore it. I did like 5 minutes of Googling and I’m pretty sure not only that I know who leaked them but also that the person had obtained them legally. Which means that there would be no need for a criminal investigation. There may be a civil cause of action that Trump could pursue but doing so would confirm their authenticity. So the most likely outcome is that there is no legal action taken from them being made public. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, ChiGoose said: I did like 5 minutes of Googling and I’m pretty sure not only that I know who leaked them but also that the person had obtained them legally. Which means that there would be no need for a criminal investigation. There may be a civil cause of action that Trump could pursue but doing so would confirm their authenticity. So the most likely outcome is that there is no legal action taken from them being made public. So you know who leaked it and they were not charged or investigated? FBI did a bang up job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: So you know who leaked it and they were not charged or investigated? FBI did a bang up job. I’ll repeat: the person who had them almost certainly obtained them legally. Therefore, there would be no crime for the FBI to investigate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 6 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: I’ll repeat: the person who had them almost certainly obtained them legally. Therefore, there would be no crime for the FBI to investigate. If so, were they legally allowed to leak them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, Doc said: If so, were they legally allowed to leak them? If I hand you my tax records, there’s no crime I’m aware of that you violate from making them public. Depending on the circumstances, I may be able to sue you for breach of contract or something similar, but I don’t think you’d be risking criminal charges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 10, 2023 Author Share Posted May 10, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irv Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 This verdict just won the 2024 election for Trump. Absolute political mistake by Demented Biden and his buddies. Thank you. What a mess. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 8 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: Why are you libs ok with it. Biden is dirty and corrupt AF. Trump distain aside you can’t like this dirty corrupt bag of skin can you? No. Don't like him at all. But, unlike Trump, I don't believe he I'd crossed the line legally. If he has throw the book at him I don't care. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Orlando Tim said: So he just believes the tax return is real without any proof of authentication, and Maddow designs a whole show without any verification? The defamation lawsuit would be a slam dunk if it was not true. Gosh, you're slow. And you actually teach people? And someone asks what's wrong with education...Is slowness now a requirement to be an R? Do you need to fail some kind of test? Edited May 10, 2023 by redtail hawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 https://news.yahoo.com/trump-gop-rival-asa-hutchinson-235500215.html More R civil warring. So much winning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 7 hours ago, BillStime said: How the f was that pos president? He doesn't even make sense. Wow. It'd be funny if it were happening to another country. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 1 minute ago, L Ron Burgundy said: How the f was that pos president? He doesn't even make sense. Wow. It'd be funny if it were happening to another country. How was he 45? 40 percent of America is angry and either brainwashed, racist, ignorant, or myopically rich. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irv Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 (edited) Trump could never get a fair trial in NYC. The charges were for rape. Instead they convict for a lesser charge. He either did it or didn’t. There’s no middle ground. It’s like convicting a guy who’s charged with murder for assault. Nice try Demented Biden. Just won the 2024 election for 45 soon to be 47. What a mess. Edited May 10, 2023 by Irv 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 5 minutes ago, Irv said: Trump could never get a fair trial in NYC. The charges were for rape. Instead they convict for a lesser charge. He either did it or didn’t. There’s no middle ground. It’s like convicting a guy who’s charged with murder for assault. Nice try Demented Biden. Just won the 2024 election for 45 soon to be 47. What a mess. 1. There is a middle ground between “didn’t do anything” and “rape”. It’s called sexual assault, which is the thing they found him guilty of. 2. Thinking that someone cannot get a fair trial based on the trial location is brain worms thinking. 95%+ of Americans don’t spend their time thinking politics all day. 3. Thinking the average voter will be more inclined to vote for Trump after he was found liable of sexual assault is also brain worms. Normie voters will likely be less inclined to support him. 4. Thinking Joe Biden was involved in this somehow is way behind brain worms. It’s brain dead. There’s no way any rational thinking person could possibly believe it. Go see a shrink. What a mess. 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts