ALF Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: This is the pertinent question: If the Left obtains enough electoral votes by fraud in order to win the election, should the election results stand? Both sides will make darn sure there is no fraud , too much at stake . The SC needs to allow as much time as needed to count and certify all mail in ballots. I don't expect a result till Dec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/25/hillary-clinton-joe-biden-election-advice-401641 Not in 2016 we didn't... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Just now, ALF said: Both sides will make darn sure there is no fraud , too much at stake . The SC needs to allow as much time as needed to count and certify all mail in ballots. I don't expect a result till Dec Why do you think Obama appointed liberal judges are ruling against state laws regarding the time limits for accepting absentee/mail in ballots? In some cases they don't even need to be postmarked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Concession is a customary gesture but it is not required to certify election results so I don't know what the fuss is all about. 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Why do you think Obama appointed liberal judges are ruling against state laws regarding the time limits for accepting absentee/mail in ballots? In some cases they don't even need to be postmarked. Because they're applying the "if you can't beat 'em, then cheat 'em" rules for getting Trump out of office so the deep state can regain full control of the federal government. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Concession is a customary gesture but it is not required to certify election results so I don't know what the fuss is all about. For me, it's just the hypocrisy of the outcry that's hilarious. No one who's upset by what Trump said yesterday said boo about Clinton saying the exact same thing less than a month ago (and actually putting that into action in 2016). They're hypocrites at worst, gravely uninformed at best. Some are a mix of the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: No one who's upset by what Trump said yesterday said boo about Clinton saying the exact same thing less than a month ago Forgot Clinton was running for president a month ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 https://thehill.com/homenews/media/513527-hillary-clinton-biden-should-not-concede-under-any-circumstances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 HRC is likely VERY worried she's going to end up in bracelets if 45 gets a second term because politically he'll have absolutely nothing to lose. The difference between her and her lemming followers is she knows EXACTLY what she's done and how illegal it is. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Just now, Alaska Darin said: HRC is likely VERY worried she's going to end up in bracelets if 45 gets a second term because politically he'll have absolutely nothing to lose. The difference between her and her lemming followers is she knows EXACTLY what she's done and how illegal it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Really miss Deflects to Clinton’s Tom today. He’d be all over this story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/26/politics/hillary-clinton-joe-biden-2020-election-donald-trump/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Rush talking up Conservative Treehouse - Woop woooop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-crenshaw-hillary-clinton-telling-biden-not-to-concede-is-eerie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 (edited) 47 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Why do you think Obama appointed liberal judges are ruling against state laws regarding the time limits for accepting absentee/mail in ballots? In some cases they don't even need to be postmarked. Link ? Trump has sent a record number of conservative judges for the Senate to confirm. He must have tipped the scales by now. Obama had a short window to get his judge picks confirmed In November 2013, Senate Democrats led by Harry Reid used the nuclear option to eliminate the 60-vote rule on executive branch nominations and federal judicial appointments, but not for the Supreme Court. The Republican Party made a net gain of nine U.S. Senate seats in the 2014 elections. Going into the elections, there were 53 Democratic, 45 Republican and 2 independent senators (both of whom caucus with the Democrats). Result 54 republican Senators In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,enabling the nomination of Trump nominee Neil Gorsuch to proceed to a vote.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appointment_and_confirmation_to_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States Edited September 24, 2020 by ALF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/hillary-clinton-says-biden-shouldnt-concede-the-election-under-any-circumstances/2401748/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/hillary-clinton-says-biden-shouldnt-concede-the-election-under-any-circumstances/2401748/ Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 https://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-urges-biden-not-135350203.html 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: For me, it's just the hypocrisy of the outcry that's hilarious. No one who's upset by what Trump said yesterday said boo about Clinton saying the exact same thing less than a month ago (and actually putting that into action in 2016). They're hypocrites at worst, gravely uninformed at best. Some are a mix of the two. My personal assessment is that most often people are blinded by their beliefs and cannot see the hypocrisy or double-standard they use to assess or evaluate issues and circumstances. Emotions and unsupported conclusions are the rule here. I think critical thinkers and skeptics are notable exceptions. I like to think I qualify as one of them. As a manager of a large data analytics and statistical organization that has access to 100's of millions, billions in fact, of data records in a particular area I've been conditioned over time to doubt almost everything that constitutes an unverified or unsupported conclusion to the point of annoying everyone in my family. While I have no verification I suspect you are likely trained or employed in some "hard" science or skilled area where facts are critical and opinions are considered but not used of or by themselves to make decisions or take actions. Edited September 24, 2020 by All_Pro_Bills 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 Elderly hot sauce aficionado who told Joe Biden not to concede under any circumstances weighs in on Trump and a peaceful transfer of power 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts