Jump to content

Dear #DeepState Coup Catchers Durham and Barr


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, BillStime said:


What was fake?  Did you read it?  Or just relying on your keepers?

 

And what success has Durham had in discrediting it?

 

 

Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers.

When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point?  

The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you?

The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you?

The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you?

The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you?

Ask yourself, what part is real?  Where is the proof?

How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism?  

It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie?

Or, your get paid to spread propaganda?

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BillStime said:

Meanwhile - Steele wouldn’t take $1m to out his sources?

That is your perspective?  Your mind must be wrestling with what it wants to believe and what is actually happening. 

Steele isn't a journalist protecting a source.  He provided a document that the FBI used to obtain FISA warrants to spy on US citizens and target a political candidate.  

You don't get the luxury of protecting your sources for those crimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Brueggs said:

Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers.

When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point?  

The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you?

The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you?

The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you?

The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you?

Ask yourself, what part is real?  Where is the proof?

How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism?  

It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie?

Or, your get paid to spread propaganda?

 

 

None of this concerns him/her and the only answer he/she gets when he/she asks him/her self questions is Trump bad.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brueggs said:

Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers.

When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point?  

The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you?

The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you?

The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you?

The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you?

Ask yourself, what part is real?  Where is the proof?

How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism?  

It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie?

Or, your get paid to spread propaganda?

 


Um - your friends in the Republican Party initially paid for the research before Hillary picked it up and why are you afraid to read it?

 

Much of it WAS verified…

 

idiots 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brueggs said:

Who said I was Republican, or didn't read it?  

Your bias makes you unable to process information sufficiently and makes you extremely predictable.

What parts were verified?

 

 

Thank you for responding without quoting.

 

Those of us who try to ignore Billsy's repetitious posts appreciate that.

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Brueggs said:

Who said I was Republican, or didn't read it?  

Your bias makes you unable to process information sufficiently and makes you extremely predictable.

What parts were verified?


lmao - god who do you sound like - lmao 

 

Well if you read it - and could process information sufficiently - lmao - you wouldn’t be so predictable in attacking me instead of proving me wrong.
 

And I already highlighted what was true in the dossier and no on fought it.

 

Go back to your safe place 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Thank you for responding without quoting.

 

Those of us who try to ignore Billsy's repetitious posts appreciate that.

 

 

.

I didn't even realize I did that...

The fact that you knew who I was responding to says it all about that character 😂

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Brueggs said:

Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers.

When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point?  

The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you?

The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you?

The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you?

The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you?

Ask yourself, what part is real?  Where is the proof?

How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism?  

It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie?

Or, your get paid to spread propaganda?

 

She doesn't care.  All she wants to know is that it's true in her mind and that's all that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, BillStime said:


🎯

 

 

What a weird topic for "concerned mental health professionals" to get involved in.  

5 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.af3f458ee8e3df255113f7bb7fda9811.jpeg

Dude, this is you.  That fire he thinks he's warming himself to is like you stoking your fires of Trump-hate/love on Twitter by looking at idiotic memes all day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Any of our resident ***** stains care to comment?

 

Wait, nevermind you can just keep ***** off.

 

 

 

Yeah, that Steele wouldn't/couldn't even corroborate his own information for $1M tells you it was all lies.  And Dems bought it because they're stupid and needed an excuse why Hilly lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah, that Steele wouldn't/couldn't even corroborate his own information for $1M tells you it was all lies.  And Dems bought it because they're stupid and needed an excuse why Hilly lost.


Yes big bad durHAM couldn’t convict anyone…

 

And well we will always commemorate this gem:

 

On 2/13/2022 at 2:56 PM, Doc said:

This is what will end up being worse than Watergate.

 

idiots lolz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every fact that goes against the latest MAGA conspiracy is actually a factor in their favor: Durham being an incompetent moron on a wild goose chase is actually proof of the FBI’s evil plot and that every single person in DC on a jury will just decide however they want because, in the end, it’s all a Xanatos Gambit of idiocy. 


Pathetic. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Every fact that goes against the latest MAGA conspiracy is actually a factor in their favor: Durham being an incompetent moron on a wild goose chase is actually proof of the FBI’s evil plot and that every single person in DC on a jury will just decide however they want because, in the end, it’s all a Xanatos Gambit of idiocy. 


Pathetic. 


You’re alive - welcome back Goose! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Every fact that goes against the latest MAGA conspiracy is actually a factor in their favor: Durham being an incompetent moron on a wild goose chase is actually proof of the FBI’s evil plot and that every single person in DC on a jury will just decide however they want because, in the end, it’s all a Xanatos Gambit of idiocy. 


Pathetic. 

 

LOL!  What "latest MAGA conspiracy"?  That the dossier was, as most of us knew, total bull#### that neither the FBI nor Steele could corroborate and that Danchenko was a liar, yet were used to go after a political enemy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc said:

 

LOL!  What "latest MAGA conspiracy"?  That the dossier was, as most of us knew, total bull#### that neither the FBI nor Steele could corroborate and that Danchenko was a liar, yet were used to go after a political enemy?


What was fake in the dossier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

LOL!  What "latest MAGA conspiracy"?  That the dossier was, as most of us knew, total bull#### that neither the FBI nor Steele could corroborate and that Danchenko was a liar, yet were used to go after a political enemy?


The dossier was barely a part of the Russia investigation. It got all of the headlines because it was salacious but most of the Russia investigation had absolutely nothing to do with it. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
×
×
  • Create New...