Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's untrue. But again, you're trying to argue without acknowledging your own failings. That's a bad way to go about it. 

 

Enjoy you're stomping ground. Glad I stopped by to talk to such reasonable people! Enjoy. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Motorin' said:

 

Enjoy you're stomping ground. Glad I stopped by to talk to such reasonable people! Enjoy. 

 

You made several false claims all in the same discussion -- then moved the goalposts when it was pointed out to you rather than be an adult and say, "oops, I was wrong". 

 

But yes. Everyone else is the unreasonable ones. 

 

Go back to sleep. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You made several false claims all in the same discussion -- then moved the goalposts when it was pointed out to you rather than be an adult and say, "oops, I was wrong". 

 

But yes. Everyone else is the unreasonable ones. 

 

Go back to sleep. 

You are ***** deranged. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Motorin' said:

 

Enjoy you're stomping ground. Glad I stopped by to talk to such reasonable people! Enjoy. 


You should stick around. Information other than what the "msm" is allowing you is always informative. You take it, disseminate it, and form your own conclusions.  Being programed by the "msm" is no way to go through life.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Motorin' said:

You are ***** deranged. 

 

That's your cognitive dissonance talking. 

 

Do better. I believe you can. But it starts by doing an honest assessment of your own discernment levels. So far, they've shown to be quite shoddy. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

There you go again -- pushing talking points from the media complex as an excuse not to look any deeper into the very real issues being raised. 

 

Quote

Because you're SOUND asleep. You just don't know it. 

The harbinger of all truth, logic and facts. A legend in his own mind how dare anyone question what he/she calls "truth" . May as well close the internet and allow THIS persona to tell us ALL what is right wrong truth deception woke asleep. Such a deep thinker. You're DEEP alright. 

 

and Buffalo Gal thinks "she's pretty sure" there may have been some deaths due to covid. Now THAT"s the kind of info I''d expect from someone like her. Close second on the deep scale. 

 

when I need a dose of know it all conspiracy theorists and wannabe experts in Everything. Solomon and Solomettes  this is where I come LOL

 

 

Edited by ~Kostabi~
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Give another example of the healthy people being shunned. Go.

WNY driving bans.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The media. 

 

Who he's TOTALLY not influenced by :lol: 

I admittedly haven't watched any of the alphabet networks or the fake news as they are nothing more than the propaganda arm of the DNC. But are they SERIOUSLY trying to say that the reopen crowd is planning to start a civil f*cking war?

Posted
Just now, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

I admittedly haven't watched any of the alphabet networks or the fake news as they are nothing more than the propaganda arm of the DNC. But are they SERIOUSLY trying to say that the reopen crowd is planning to start a civil f*cking war?

no 

Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Hey, wanna read this NIH study on masks?

I know, I know, it doesn't fit the new world order so the NIH (in 2015) must be sandbagging, buuuut...

Wear you mask if you like. If it isn't a N95 you are simply virtual signaling.

 

 

This study was for "cloth mask use for HCWs was conducted in 14 hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam."

 

Hardly surprising that in that setting cloth masks didn't protect the HCWs as well as surgical masks is it?  And at this point, most people shouldn't be wearing crappy scarfs. You can get a decent fitting medical mask from lots of places (not necessarily the N95). 

 

If the patients had been wearing masks AND the HCWs were wearing them too..., then you'd have a study that makes an interesting point that would kind of replicate the real world.

 

Being upset about hot and itchy masks remains no excuse not to wear them indoors with strangers. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

That's your cognitive dissonance talking.

 

Uh, Greg... It's literally in your username.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

 

1 minute ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

When did this happen? I was just out in Rochester and Mt. Morris yesterday, I didn't see any of this

 During blizzards. 

Posted
1 minute ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

When did this happen? I was just out in Rochester and Mt. Morris yesterday, I didn't see any of this

Pretty much every winter except this last one during blizzards.

Posted
Just now, shoshin said:

 

This study was for "cloth mask use for HCWs was conducted in 14 hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam."

 

Hardly surprising that in that setting cloth masks didn't protect the HCWs as well as surgical masks is it?  And at this point, most people shouldn't be wearing crappy scarfs. You can get a decent fitting medical mask from lots of places (not necessarily the N95). 

 

If the patients had been wearing masks AND the HCWs were wearing them too..., then you'd have a study that makes an interesting point that would kind of replicate the real world.

 

Being upset about hot and itchy masks remains no excuse not to wear them indoors with strangers. 


:wallbash: It shows that cloth masks are WORTHLESS. It does not matter if you are in an igloo, a desert, a tropical paradise, you are blocking 3% of partials with a cloth mask.  A medical mask is at 44% (frightening, I had hoped for 100%), and the N95 are at 99.97% (what someone who is at risk hopes we all wear).

I am sorry someone sneezed on you when you were little and you do not know how to practice good hygiene, but Jesus H Christ, get over it.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, Doc Brown said:

Pretty much every winter except this last one during blizzards.

Sorry I misunderstood you I thought you meant right now during the lockdown sorry

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

 

34 minutes ago, meazza said:

 

Here is why you fail in your analysis:

 

1) The Spanish flu was very bad for healthy young people and extremely devestating for pregnant women and their unborn children.

2) The Spanish flu was during a period of war therefore most people were probably having a hard time getting food, medicine and water based.

3) The technology differences between 1918 and today are obviously exponentially different.

 

I heard we burned people during the plague to flatten the curve.  Do you want to do that?

Ya know what was crazy? And this is prolly totally OT..but

 

1)It was during the war, and Wilson was so focused on winning the war so he could craft the peace that he never said one word about the epidemic..not one single stinking word. He thought it could distract the American people from focusing on the war effort. There was ZERO federal responce to the epidemic. 

 

2) What information did come out, came form the CPI Committee for Public Information. Pretty messed up this was allowed in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_Public_Information

This is why I think, it essential to have a battling press. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, plenzmd1 said:

 

Ya know what was crazy? And this is prolly totally OT..but

 

1)It was during the war, and Wilson was so focused on winning the war so he could craft the peace that he never said one word about the epidemic..not one single stinking word. He thought it could distract the American people from focusing on the war effort. There was ZERO federal responce to the epidemic. 

 

2) What information did come out, came form the CPI Committee for Public Information. Pretty messed up this was allowed in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_Public_Information

This is why I think, it essential to have a battling press. 

More evidence of Trump and his damndable lies lies lies!!

 

Oh wait, wrong pandemic. $#@! Wilson! 

 

I take your point, but I'm less interested in a battling press, much more interested in fair and accurate. Thankfully, we have choices in that regard and don't have to rely on traditional sources. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...