Bob in Mich Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 25 minutes ago, Foxx said: Bob, is your real name Adam? i'm beginning to think so because you are making up story after story after story to show your insecurity. Stories? Not sure about stories but I can be accused of juggling a lot of analogies. I have football games and rapists and bank robbers to name a few I don't get your insecurity point as I am doing that to help simplify the arguments. Sometimes it helps to strip away unimportant information to help uncover the crux. If you'd like to explain how trying to use analogies demonstrates insecurity, that would be interesting.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) From a Bush staffer too... 5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Stories? Not sure about stories but I can be accused of juggling a lot of analogies. Not juggling analogies --butchering them, dismembering them, and then smearing them on the wall and calling it an honest argument. 5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: I don't get your insecurity point as I am doing that to help simplify the arguments. Sometimes it helps to strip away unimportant information to help uncover the crux. Those who can't think for themselves, which you've proven you cannot, should not then try to create "simplified" analogies in order to explain issues they do not fully understand. You have yet to make an original argument, or one that hasn't come from the mouths of the media/DNC complex. 5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: If you'd like to explain how trying to use analogies demonstrates insecurity, that would be interesting. You can't argue the facts, or the substance of this issue (because you do not know it, by your own admission). You refuse to read any relevant information given to you by others. And you proved, over and over again with each post, that you have nothing but emotion and mind reading as your central arguments, and wish to invert the entire system of jurisprudence in order to suit it to your desire -- rule of law be damned. You're not insecure. You're too stupid to be insecure. You think you're smart. You think you're right. Which is just more proof that your mind is indeed broken. Edited January 31, 2020 by Deranged Rhino 2
Bray Wyatt Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 55 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Well, would it be fair to say that in this instance you don't want more evidence? This is political and more evidence may hurt Trump and he is on the verge of acquittal. OK, fair enough. If in court (different, yes) with your daughter's accused rapist. During the trial a witness comes out of the blue and pipes up in court and says, "I want to be called to the stand. I witnessed the whole thing." Would you want to hear that evidence even though obviously the police/prosecutor did not do a thorough job of investigating or lining up all witnesses. Or, let the guy walk ? Then the house should not have rushed the impeachment process, no one defined how long they can take to gather evidence. They decided to screw the pooch, the Senate is not there to do the house's job, otherwise why have the House involved at all? 2 2
Bob in Mich Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 32 minutes ago, ScotSHO said: It's almost as if there is an unwritten rule book that they are told to follow. Or, they know the current political environment. They know too we have mental health and gun proliferation issues in our country. Maybe they think trying to push the guy further into the limelight unnecessarily endangers him and his family. Or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 1 hour ago, dubs said: Additional live look at House Managers: that driver, though. #wrecked 2 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 Just now, Bob in Mich said: Or, they know the current political environment. They know too we have mental health and gun proliferation issues in our country. Maybe they think trying to push the guy further into the limelight unnecessarily endangers him and his family. Or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower? You never said a word when the same ire, threats of violence, and vitriol were pushed on a true whistleblower: Nunes. Why is that, Bob? Is it because you're playing sides? Or is it because you're uninformed? Both? 1 2
Nanker Posted January 31, 2020 Author Posted January 31, 2020 Best thing about today IMHO - Shifty Schiff kept Nads Nadler off the Senate floor after his stealing the spotlight last night! Worth thing about today IMHO - is so many of you engaging in post after post of fruitless dialog with Bob in Marijuana. 2 1 1
123719bwiqrb Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 Just now, Bob in Mich said: Or, they know the current political environment. They know too we have mental health and gun proliferation issues in our country. Maybe they think trying to push the guy further into the limelight unnecessarily endangers him and his family. Or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower? Good thing the journalist's save the day, just like Superman right? 1
Nanker Posted January 31, 2020 Author Posted January 31, 2020 1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said: that driver, though. #wrecked His glasses went overboard too. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 Just now, Nanker said: Best thing about today IMHO - Shifty Schiff kept Nads Nadler off the Senate floor after his stealing the spotlight last night! Worth thing about today IMHO - is so many of you engaging in post after post of fruitless dialog with Bob in Marijuana. It's the American way. It's even in the song: "Above the fruitless plane..." 1
Bray Wyatt Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: What I just posted, summed up perfectly 1
Bray Wyatt Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Nanker said: Best thing about today IMHO - Shifty Schiff kept Nads Nadler off the Senate floor after his stealing the spotlight last night! Worth thing about today IMHO - is so many of you engaging in post after post of fruitless dialog with Bob in Marijuana. LOL I tried staying out of it, but he just says some stuff that you want to believe he cant be that dumb! Edit: Oh and I am bored with a slow day at work Edited January 31, 2020 by Bray Wyatt
Bob in Mich Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You're escalating the rhetoric. You started out just looking for truth, you moved on to opining he's guilty though you haven't heard from the witnesses you long for, and now he's a bank robber caught in the lobby?* How could this be given you simply cannot know the full story??! You sounds suspiciously like one of those monotone Wonderbread professors on "American Landscape" on that damn NPR channel! You should throw Fox on once in a while. *this mindset is exactly why no political party/defense team would let the enemy define the rules of the game. People fib, and their true motives are usually hidden. And here I trusted you! ? Loonie Toonie, thanks for the reply. lol I disagree surprisingly. Nothing personal, but I am about done typing today. A bit more though for my friend. I do watch Fox News way more than I would like as it typically ends with me yelling and spitting upon my own video screens. I do so for an educational balance attempt. The witnesses are needed, not for an impartial jury, that would be unnecessary as imo the case is proven. The witnesses are needed in spite of impossible conviction in order to find out the truth so we can agree going forward what is legal and what is illegal. I guess all future candidates can now 'cheat', so the playing field levels even though I think that decision is a horrible one. now, get that rest buddy
Wacka Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 B in M, Tibs, Gary etc. are like the Fembots after Austin Powers danced in front of them 1 3
Foxx Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) brilliant strategy by Sekulow right now. pointing out that of the 13 witnesses that have already testified, the Presidents council did not have the opportunity to cross examine any of them. if witnesses are called, the WHC would have to have the right to cross examine them. the Donners ***** up royally. Edited January 31, 2020 by Foxx 4 1
Nanker Posted January 31, 2020 Author Posted January 31, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Wacka said: B in M, Tibs, Gary etc. are like the Fembots after Austin Powers danced in front of them Edited January 31, 2020 by Nanker 1 4
BillsFanNC Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 Whistleblowers must be protected!! https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/11/the-media-holds-a-massive-double-standard-about-naming-whistleblowers/ Quote Conversely, Lovinger, a man with impeccable credentials as a longtime member of the national security apparatus and supporter of the Trump administration’s agenda, saw his career destroyed after whistleblowing on activity he saw as fraudulent. Lovinger called into question the legitimacy of lucrative but possibly sham contracts doled out by the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment to, among others, Stefan Halper, the confidential informant who spied on the Trump campaign, as well as a close confidante of Chelsea Clinton on whose behalf Hillary Clinton had lobbied. In what appears to be an egregious example of administrative state tyranny, Lovinger was pushed out of his new position in the Trump National Security Council (NSC), stripped of his security clearance, and finally suspended without pay while trying to litigate four apparently meritless cases against officials he alleges targeted him for his whistleblowing. 3
Rob's House Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 4 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said: So you asked a question, i answered and you ignored what i said. Strange no mention of Biden from what i said. And i never said or intimated because ofTrump University, Trump wasnt honest, as i said it was a fly by night university for fly by night degrees, runnijng that doesnt mean he is "dishoinest". You really dont want to debate, you want to preach and proselytize Tibs has no interest in debate, or the pursuit of truth. He's a troll that some speculate is paid to spam message boards with DNC talking points. The only reason to respond to him is if you get some level of satisfaction out of tearing down his arguments (to the extent you can call them arguments). Most regulars have him on ignore. I hate blocking people because I like to hear what the opposition has to say, but I had to make an exception for him due to the volume of his posts. The board has been much more enjoyable since. 8 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 31, 2020 Posted January 31, 2020 11 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Loonie Toonie, thanks for the reply. lol I disagree surprisingly. Nothing personal, but I am about done typing today. A bit more though for my friend. I do watch Fox News way more than I would like as it typically ends with me yelling and spitting upon my own video screens. I do so for an educational balance attempt. The witnesses are needed, not for an impartial jury, that would be unnecessary as imo the case is proven. The witnesses are needed in spite of impossible conviction in order to find out the truth so we can agree going forward what is legal and what is illegal. I guess all future candidates can now 'cheat', so the playing field levels even though I think that decision is a horrible one. now, get that rest buddy Good God! The witnesses are needed in spite of impossible conviction in order to find out the truth so we can agree going forward what is legal and what is illegal. You should consider a name change to Pootie Tang in Mich. 1 2
Recommended Posts