Jump to content
Nanker

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump

Recommended Posts

Whistleblowers must be protected!!  

 

https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/11/the-media-holds-a-massive-double-standard-about-naming-whistleblowers/

 

Quote

 

Conversely, Lovinger, a man with impeccable credentials as a longtime member of the national security apparatus and supporter of the Trump administration’s agenda, saw his career destroyed after whistleblowing on activity he saw as fraudulent. Lovinger called into question the legitimacy of lucrative but possibly sham contracts doled out by the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment to, among others, Stefan Halper, the confidential informant who spied on the Trump campaign, as well as a close confidante of Chelsea Clinton on whose behalf Hillary Clinton had lobbied.

 

In what appears to be an egregious example of administrative state tyranny, Lovinger was pushed out of his new position in the Trump National Security Council (NSC), stripped of his security clearance, and finally suspended without pay while trying to litigate four apparently meritless cases against officials he alleges targeted him for his whistleblowing.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

 

So you asked a question, i answered and you ignored what i said.   Strange no mention of Biden from what i said.  And i never said or intimated because ofTrump University, Trump wasnt honest, as i said it was a fly by night university for fly by night degrees, runnijng that doesnt mean he is "dishoinest".   

 

You really dont want to debate, you want to preach and proselytize

 

Tibs has no interest in debate, or the pursuit of truth. He's a troll that some speculate is paid to spam message boards with DNC talking points.

 

The only reason to respond to him is if you get some level of satisfaction out of tearing down his arguments (to the extent you can call them arguments).

 

Most regulars have him on ignore. I hate blocking people because I like to hear what the opposition has to say, but I had to make an exception for him due to the volume of his posts. The board has been much more enjoyable since.

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Thanks! (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Loonie Toonie, thanks for the reply.  lol   I disagree surprisingly.  Nothing personal, but I am about done typing today.  A bit more though for my friend. 

 

I do watch Fox News way more than I would like as it typically ends with me yelling and spitting upon my own video screens.  I do so for an educational balance attempt.

 

The witnesses are needed, not for an impartial jury, that would be unnecessary as imo the case is proven.  The witnesses are needed in spite of impossible conviction in order to find out the truth so we can agree going forward what is legal and what is illegal.  I guess all future candidates can now 'cheat', so the playing field levels even though I think that decision is a horrible one.

 

now, get that rest buddy

Good God!  

The witnesses are needed in spite of impossible conviction in order to find out the truth so we can agree going forward what is legal and what is illegal. 

 

You should consider a name change to Pootie Tang in Mich. 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

Tibs has no interest in debate, or the pursuit of truth. He's a troll that some speculate is paid to spam message boards with DNC talking points.

 

The only reason to respond to him is if you get some level of satisfaction out of tearing down his arguments (to the extent you can call them arguments).

 

Most regulars have him on ignore. I hate blocking people because I like to hear what the opposition has to say, but I had to make an exception for him due to the volume of his posts. The board has been much more enjoyable since.

I still believe he is a BOT; the tech has been there for years to online chat at his level of one way input.  I find it hard to believe he is a real person.  Why keep coming back day after day, hitting your head on a wall like that?

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Foxx said:

you attacked me there. you brought up the other board, here. you opened the bottle, i'm just capping it.

 

it's okay, snowflake. i promise you won't melt (literally anyways).

Don't worry, it's not like you told one of the moderators f**k you, I'll do whatever the h**l I want here and you can't do a thing about it.

 

And if irrelevant was a cause for reporting posts.........well, you know what would have been the outcome a long time ago.

  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ScotSHO said:

I still believe he is a BOT; the tech has been there for years to online chat at his level of one way input.  I find it hard to believe he is a real person.  Why keep coming back day after day, hitting your head on a wall like that?

 

I think he's an actual person, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the bulk of his posts are copied and pasted from a talking points bulletin.

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

More Acquittal votes ?

 

 

 

"Murkowski says she’ll vote no on witnesses, likely dealing fatal blow."

 

That sentence is a headline at the NYT.

Interesting to learn how Murkowski will vote, but it's a pro-Trump vote, so it's not "fatal" as far as the target of this proceeding is concerned.

If we're using this metaphor of death, we need to know whose death is under discussion.
 
It's a fatal blow to the enterprise of killing the Trump presidency. At least.
 
Maybe it's a fatal blow to the Democratic Party... or — to be less dramatic — to the 2020 ambitions of the Democratic Party.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

I think he's an actual person, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the bulk of his posts are copied and pasted from a talking points bulletin.

To correct the record:

 

meme

  • Haha (+1) 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, I am the egg man said:

Another Lib loses it:

https://freebeacon.com/politics/msnbc-contributor-if-trump-is-acquitted-he-will-shut-down-voting-in-california/

 

.....it's only the beginning of their insanity.

 

...HUH?....they've been in "full speed ahead....for his head" since Nov 2016.......but these meltdowns are the best........

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

I think he's an actual person, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the bulk of his posts are copied and pasted from a talking points bulletin.

  He's fed material from various leftist sources such as the DNC.  This includes "analysis."  He probably has support in terms of responses and when he is slow/no that most likely means there is a backup at the "think" tank.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RochesterRob said:

  He's fed material from various leftist sources such as the DNC.  This includes "analysis."  He probably has support in terms of responses and when he is slow/no that most likely means there is a backup at the "think" tank.

 

Then what about Gary?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Then what about Gary?

  His schtick is pretty much insults here but I do see him over on TSW so probably a real person.  Pretty easy to get rep points there so maybe that is a consideration so he looks like he has cred.  Anyways, I think the Tiberius character is just about played out so look for a new character that talks like him soon.

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Foxx said:

hahahahahahaaa. 

 

where is Nadler? nowhere to be found is the House Judiciary Chair.

 

😂

Jerry, Jerry.....Jerry

 

The new rally call of the Left.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rob's House said:

 

I think he's an actual person, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the bulk of his posts are copied and pasted from a talking points bulletin.

Must be, and gets what 10 cents a post? Probably decent money to hit copy paste all day.

Edited by ScotSHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

!@#$ Romney

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

To correct the record:

 

meme

....EXACTLY why we need  a "HOF POSTS FORUM"......this could be the inaugural qualifier unanimously...........:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

say goodnight, the party's over.

 

51 nays

49 yeas

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

....EXACTLY why we need  a "HOF POSTS FORUM"......this could be the inaugural qualifier unanimously...........:D

We have one but you'll have to nominate this, I can't.

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

say goodnight, the party's over.

 

51 nays

49 yeas

Why Jerry didn't make it today:
Image result for penguin gif

  • Haha (+1) 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said:

I do watch Fox News way more than I would like as it typically ends with me yelling and spitting upon my own video screens. 

 

Does this sound like a stable person to you?

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Does this sound like a stable person to you?

Says the guys who spends every waking moment here. 😂😂😂😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

It’s looking increasingly like the curtain might soon be coming down on the Democrats’ impeachment circus, but Nancy Pelosi is handling it well.

 

Wait, no she isn’t — but she has come up with a name intended to glorify the House impeachment managers:

 

 

That’s what we thought she said. Pelosi obviously thinks “magnificent custodians of the Constitution” sounds better than “neverending impeachment circus ringleaders”

 

 

.

 

 

200.gif

 

Expect to see a lot of this the next few days

The Return of the Magnificent Custodians

Image result for custodians

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...