Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 ***************** 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 17 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I call people who refuse to think for themselves don't agree with me NPCs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 18 hours ago, billsfan89 said: All my point was that Trump much like Bill Clinton did technically commit a crime on two fronts, one is obstruction in the Russia probe and the other was a campaign finance law violation soliciting political help from Ukraine outside of the Justice Department. But much like the Clinton Impeachment Trump's crimes do not (Based off what we know so far, I would love to see Bolton and others testify before making a definitive conclusion) rise to the levels of being removed from office. But you guys are such a sycophantic echo chamber in the pocket of Trump that any mild criticism of the dear leader and criticism of Republicans comes with an onslaught of purposefully dense thinking, whataboutisms. bad faith interpretations and hack right wing Trump defense talking points. You go around calling everyone NPC's yet 80% of people here think exactly the same. Yes because at will employees can be fired based off their race? It's not like there are regulations. Wait... Clinton actually committed a crime. Trump didn’t. These thing are not the same. People are are calling you out because you’re not being accurate in what you assert. It doesn’t have to do with being sycophantic to any person, but making sure that there is truth in what people think. Love Trump or hate him, doesn’t have anything to do with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 18 hours ago, billsfan89 said: All my point was that Trump much like Bill Clinton did technically commit a crime on two fronts, one is obstruction in the Russia probe and the other was a campaign finance law violation soliciting political help from Ukraine outside of the Justice Department. But much like the Clinton Impeachment Trump's crimes do not (Based off what we know so far, I would love to see Bolton and others testify before making a definitive conclusion) rise to the levels of being removed from office. You can't say Trump technically committed a crime. Clinton did. Trump allegedly did, though the groupthink here thinks not. 18 hours ago, billsfan89 said: But you guys are such a sycophantic echo chamber in the pocket of Trump that any mild criticism of the dear leader and criticism of Republicans comes with an onslaught of purposefully dense thinking, whataboutisms. bad faith interpretations and hack right wing Trump defense talking points. You go around calling everyone NPC's yet 80% of people here think exactly the same. Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 "Only"! — "Dem leaders see only handful of defections on impeachment." The news isn't "only a handful" — it's that there are defections.The story is at Politico. Democratic leaders are privately expecting no more than a half-dozen defections on next week’s vote to impeach President Donald Trump, even as many of their most endangered lawmakers remain publicly mum on their decision.... The same story at WaPo is "House Democrats brace for some defections among moderates on impeachment of Trump." Lawmakers and senior aides are privately predicting they will lose more than the two Democrats who opposed the impeachment inquiry rules package in late September, according to multiple officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly. Two senior Democratic aides said the total could be as many as a half-dozen, while a third said the number could be higher. So... Politico says "no more than a half-dozen" and WaPo has 2 sources who say that and one who says "could be higher." . 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 Pelosi says leadership won't pressure moderates to back impeachment https://thehill.com/homenews/house/474279-pelosi-says-leadership-wont-pressure-moderates-to-back-impeachment 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: Pelosi says leadership won't pressure moderates to back impeachment https://thehill.com/homenews/house/474279-pelosi-says-leadership-wont-pressure-moderates-to-back-impeachment ...I trust her.....after all, she IS a practicing Catholic...................... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 It’s pretty remarkable how fast this whole thing fell apart. I mean, not to people who’ve been paying attention, but all the NPCs heads must be spinning. it’ll be a fun game to guess what the next iteration of the resistance will be. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: holy *****. he just can't be serious. he doesn't have to schedule the hearing before the mark-up?? really??? Edited December 12, 2019 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 41 minutes ago, dubs said: It’s pretty remarkable how fast this whole thing fell apart. I mean, not to people who’ve been paying attention, but all the NPCs heads must be spinning. it’ll be a fun game to guess what the next iteration of the resistance will be. left doesn't care, everything is a hassle about POWER to them, no matter how puny or silly the POWER is in a situation so being smashed down with no evidence doesn't phase them one bit at all 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, B-Man said: "Only"! — "Dem leaders see only handful of defections on impeachment." The news isn't "only a handful" — it's that there are defections.The story is at Politico. Democratic leaders are privately expecting no more than a half-dozen defections on next week’s vote to impeach President Donald Trump, even as many of their most endangered lawmakers remain publicly mum on their decision.... The same story at WaPo is "House Democrats brace for some defections among moderates on impeachment of Trump." Lawmakers and senior aides are privately predicting they will lose more than the two Democrats who opposed the impeachment inquiry rules package in late September, according to multiple officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly. Two senior Democratic aides said the total could be as many as a half-dozen, while a third said the number could be higher. So... Politico says "no more than a half-dozen" and WaPo has 2 sources who say that and one who says "could be higher." . Good. Showing some backbone vs the party machine. Edited December 12, 2019 by John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, Foxx said: holy *****. he just can't be serious. he doesn't have to schedule the hearing before the mark-up?? really??? Jerry The Hutt to the prisoner: We'll let you submit your DNA after we execute you. 59 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...I trust her.....after all, she IS a practicing Catholic...................... She needs more practice. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, John Adams said: Good. Showing some backbone vs the party machine. lol, yeah... a handful of defections to the party line that is not going to change a damn thing... that'll show 'em gosh darn it! wake up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: lol, yeah... a handful of defections to the party line that is not going to change a damn thing... that'll show 'em gosh darn it! wake up. Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line. Applaud the defectors, especially when they do the right thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts