Jump to content

Whistleblower Has Been Backed Up By Multiple Witnesses


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

Just now, B-Man said:

No! We are not allowed to compare this to the Russia thing! lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

Out of the 30 minute call, this is the supposed "impeachable" part.

 

EFUNu1WXoAAkL4i.png

 

No quid pro quo......................................sounds like the country's chief executive doing his job.

 

 

Please run with this lefties 

?

 

 

9 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

Just read the transcript.

 

Trump is such a crook. 

 

They've started already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

:wacko: that makes NO sense. 

 

I understand people have TDS, but that statement is just plain stupid. 

 

Really?

 

The Ukrainian President asks for missiles for their defense, and Trump responds saying he needs a favour, asks about a cloud service and a server and claims he thinks it's in Ukraine (I assume he's looking for Hilary's emails). 

 

He then goes onto say he wants a new prosecutor put in place to investigate the Bidens. He openly solicits a foreign power for dirt on a political rival. 

 

And then ultimately he says his lawyer, Giuliani, will contact the Ukrainian President and set up a face to face meeting in Ukraine. Keep in mind that Giuliani has no official role in the White House, and strictly works for Trump. 

 

If this doesn't bother you, I don't know what to say. 

 

None of this is normal. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty straight forward, Trump withheld the aid, then asked repeatedly for a favor from the Uk president.

 

Of course the Trump released transcript wouldn't show direct quid pro quo, that's why they released it. But there is a lot more, WH officials, the whistleblower, the Inspector General who called this an urgent matter and of course, there is Rudy running his mouth and basically admitting that he is trying to find dirt in a foreign country to benefit Trump politically. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Posted only because the scene immediately came to mind after reading your post. Yes, you are an arrogant ass. Walking back your TDS shitposts after it looks like maybe Trump isn't in such deepshit is the kind of thing I'd expect from you. Trying to put the blame on others is also the kind of thing I'd expect from you.

 

You'd love for me to be a TDS nutjob. That makes your pea brain easily do black/white thinking. You see TRUMP and your heart swells with all the goodness it represents and you see DEMOCRAT and it's the orc army of evil. Life is not that simple. Lift some weights with your brain and break out of the black/white narrative. 

 

There is some smoke here. At the very least, we know that Trump withheld earmarked money, his attorney admitted he pressed Ukraine about Biden (he also denied it--Trump may throw Rudy under the bus soon--the guy is a mess), and Trump had two calls. What more we don't yet know. 

 

I suspect that the call will show him pressuring the Ukies to investigate [something...not sure if Biden will be mentioned by name], but not show the quid pro quo link of the money he withheld before the call and released when Congress got up his ass about it. 

 

The Dem impeachment is absurd and not warranted (yet, if ever). 

Edited by John Adams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John Adams said:

 

You'd love for me to be a TDS nutjob. That makes your pea brain easily do black/white thinking. You see TRUMP and your heart swells with all the goodness it represents and you see DEMOCRAT and it's the orc army of evil. Life is not that simple. Lift some weights with your brain and break out of the black/white narrative. 

 

There is some smoke here. At the very least, we know that Trump withheld earmarked money, his attorney admitted he pressed Ukraine about Biden (he also denied it--Trump may throw Rudy under the bus soon--the guy is a mess), and Trump had two calls. What more we don't yet know. 

 

I suspect that the call will show him pressuring the Ukies to investigate [something...not sure if Biden will be mentioned by name], but not show the quid pro guo link of the money he withheld before the call and released when Congress got up his ass about it. 

 

The Dem impeachment is absurd and not warranted (yet, if ever). 

I'm going to go with you on this, Rudy is just painful to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Out of the 30 minute call, this is the supposed "impeachable" part.

 

EFUNu1WXoAAkL4i.png

 

No quid pro quo......................................sounds like the country's chief executive doing his job.

 

 

Please run with this lefties 

?

 

 

So again... to recap what I said last night and what we now see is true: 

 

The establishment IC just tried to run the SAME play they ran with Russia Collusion: Use a politically motivated, anonymous IC source who claims to have more information about a crime and a threat to the country than he/she actually does. Then the media ran the SAME play they tried for three years, throwing gas on the fire, lying the public about the contents of the charge (first it was there was quid pro quo, then there wasn't. first the source was on the call, then he wasn't). 

 

When the smoke clears, it turns out the reporting was over-hyped. There was no quid pro quo, there was no "8 mentions of Joe", there was no pushing of the investigation. Just more lies by the media working hand in hand with the establishment and IC to attack a legally elected president.  

 

And transplant and Jrober are here acting, again, like "THIS TIME WE GOT TRUMP!"

 

They've learned nothing from the past three years. Nothing. Nor have many people. 

 

... But that aside, there WAS gold in them there transcripts: not only is everyone now focused on crooked Joe and his son -- but also on this bit: 

 

Posting for the second tweet: 

 

CROWDSTRIKE

CROWDSTRIKE

CROWDSTRIKE

 

That's what scares the hell out of Pelosi and Chuck more than anything. That's why they were trying to get ahead of this. 

 

Bye, Joe. 

Bye, Nancy.

Bye, Hillary.

Bye, Obama.

Bye, Kerry.

Bye, Crowdstrike.

Bye, Fusion GPS/Glenn Simpson

Bye, Dem majority in the House. 

 

This isn't the left shooting them in the foot -- they shot themselves in the face on cable news. :lol: 

 

2 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

None of this is normal. 

 

A running coup against a sitting president launched by the IC and media is definitely not normal. We are in agreement there. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

Really?

 

The Ukrainian President asks for missiles for their defense, and Trump responds saying he needs a favour, asks about a cloud service and a server and claims he thinks it's in Ukraine (I assume he's looking for Hilary's emails). 

 

He then goes onto say he wants a new prosecutor put in place to investigate the Bidens. He openly solicits a foreign power for dirt on a political rival. 

 

And then ultimately he says his lawyer, Giuliani, will contact the Ukrainian President and set up a face to face meeting in Ukraine. Keep in mind that Giuliani has no official role in the White House, and strictly works for Trump. 

 

If this doesn't bother you, I don't know what to say. 

 

None of this is normal. 


You skipped reading comprehension in school, didn't you? 

Here, this was what Biden did, and what he had shutdown in the Ukraine; what the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION paid the (former) Ukraine administration to do, while Biden's son got a big ole payday:
 



What is not normal is the "we got him now!" stupidity those afflicted with TDS have been spouting for nearly three years because they are so psychotic they are unwilling/unable to accept the results of an election. 

And, as I predicted the day that Biden entered the presidential race (anyone can check that thread), Biden entered so he can scream POLITICAL PERSECUTION when this all came to light.

 
 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


You skipped reading comprehension is school, didn't you? 

Here, this was what Biden did, and what he had shutdown in the Ukraine; what the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION paid the (former) Ukraine administration to do, while Biden's son got a big ole payday:
 



What is not normal is the "we got him now!" stupidity those afflicted with TDS have been spouting for nearly three years because they are so psychotic they are unwilling/unable to accept the results of an election. 

And, as I predicted the day that Biden entered the presidential race (anyone can check that thread), Biden entered so he can scream POLITICAL PERSECUTION when this all came to light.

 
 

 

You did. Called it from the start. :beer:

 

Joe's done. He never had a chance but now he might not even make it to January.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

a politically motivated, anonymous IC source who claims to have more information about a crime and a threat to the country than he/she actually does.

 

All of this is 100% bull#### propaganda you've ingested from the likes of Tracy Beanz and John Solomon.

 

Until the whistleblower report is released it's 100% hear say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

All of this is 100% bull#### propaganda you've ingested from the likes of Tracy Beanz and John Solomon.

 

Until the whistleblower report is released it's 100% hear say. 

 

 

 

LOL..............

 

Transcript fails............................on to the (falsely named) Whistleblower.

 

Ahhhhh...............the smell of liberal desperation.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

 

LOL..............

 

Transcript fails............................on to the (falsely named) Whistleblower.

 

Ahhhhh...............the smell of liberal desperation.

 

 

 

 

Got to hand it to them... A transcript of a call isn't evidence -- but the testimony of a guy who wasn't on the call about the call is what we really need to see! :lol: 

 

They never learn. TDS has addled many a brain.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The establishment IC just tried to run the SAME play they ran with Russia Collusion: Use a politically motivated, anonymous IC source who claims to have more information about a crime and a threat to the country than he/she actually does.

 

The source here isn't anonymous. Just unknown to you and me (so far). 

 

You often say things like this to fit your narrative. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

You'd love for me to be a TDS nutjob. That makes your pea brain easily do black/white thinking. You see TRUMP and your heart swells with all the goodness it represents and you see DEMOCRAT and it's the orc army of evil. Life is not that simple. Lift some weights with your brain and break out of the black/white narrative. 

 

There is some smoke here. At the very least, we know that Trump withheld earmarked money, his attorney admitted he pressed Ukraine about Biden (he also denied it--Trump may throw Rudy under the bus soon--the guy is a mess), and Trump had two calls. What more we don't yet know. 

 

I suspect that the call will show him pressuring the Ukies to investigate [something...not sure if Biden will be mentioned by name], but not show the quid pro quo link of the money he withheld before the call and released when Congress got up his ass about it. 

 

The Dem impeachment is absurd and not warranted (yet, if ever). 

You walk backwards so well you might want to think about taking up hockey. You suspect a lot of things but it still won't change the fact that you're an arrogant ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Got to hand it to them... A transcript of a call isn't evidence -- but the testimony of a guy who wasn't on the call about the call is what we really need to see! :lol: 

 

They never learn. TDS has addled many a brain.

 

Whistleblower Complaint is the central issue - call is a part of it, not the other way around as much as you'd like that to be the case.

 

How many Twitter impressions did you get this week?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He literally just tried to say a source which is anonymous to the public isn't really anonymous. He's full of it.

 

You're living in the moment of this inquiry Mr. Knee-jerk Twitterbot. We will all know who this is. You use "anonymous" like it's an "anonymous" news story. This person's identity is known by a lot of people right now in government and the media. They are working out a deal now to get him to testify. Just let the process run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Schiff has spoken. 

 

Wonder if he's ever going to offer up to the public the evidence he had (which he said wasn't circumstantial) about Trump colluding with Russia. 

 

:lol: AOC's tweet is gold too.

1 minute ago, John Adams said:

 

 

You're living in the moment of this inquiry Mr. Knee-jerk Twitterbot. We will all know who this is. You use "anonymous" like it's an "anonymous" news story. This person's identity is known by a lot of people right now in government and the media. They are working out a deal now to get him to testify. Just let the process run. 

 

The source is anonymous. We cannot question him. We cannot ask anything about him. Who is twisting to fit a narrative again? You're literally trying to have it both ways. Sorry, you're wrong. By any definition.

 

Ratcliffe just now: "I keep hearing a bunch of excuses for why it (the transcript) doesn't say what they said it would say."

 

Lots of excused for it, Mr. Ratcliffe. But only one reason: The media and left lied to the public. 


Again. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Look at this shift -- we just spent three years hearing how there's nothing more important than getting to the bottom of what happened in 2016, but if Trump tries: TREASON!

 

 

 

These people are making themselves look foolish. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.


The words "crowdstrike" + "server" is what has them all wetting their panties. This is just throwing poop at the wall and hoping something saves them from what is coming down the pike.

The last gasp of a failed coup attempt, and now the writhing of the snake whose head is about to be chopped off. (I sincerely hope I am not wrong about what is to come in #twoweeks.) 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


The words "crowdstrike" + "server" is what has them all wetting their panties. This is just throwing poop at the wall and hoping something saves them from what is coming down the pike.

The last gasp of a failed coup attempt, and now the writhing of the snake whose head is about to be chopped off. (I sincerely hope I am not wrong about what is to come in #twoweeks.) 

 

 

100% 


And I have to say, I did not expect to see Crowdstrike in that transcript, and I was prepared to see a lot of crazy in there. The fact that the media is now talking about Crowdstrike again (and the fact that most on the left do not even know who/what Crowdstrike is let alone how integral to the plot in 2016 they were) is setting up the OIG report and Durham findings perfectly. 

 

Keeping them front and center in the minds of the public. 

 

Trump sits down soon with the Ukrainian president soon. That will be must watch TV. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media and the other TDSers have taken the lead from the NY Times, who really know how to twist the issue for the sake of their agenda. They take unsubstantiated claims and put them on the front page. When proven wrong they make a note of it on page 23 or just ignore the contrary evidence. Down the road Adam Schiff or John Adams/Ben Franklin/Beginner's Mind will bring up what was said on page 1 as if page 23 never happened.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...