Jump to content

"The Bills are winning this Draft" - Per Matt Miller


Scorp83

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 83Reed said:

 Having multiple RBs coming out the backfield is going to cause some mismatches. One of those guys are going to get a LB mismatch.Thats where the Yeldon pick up makes sense. He had 487 yds and 4 tds receiving last year. 

Hmmm ???  but we could have went WR instead of QB ... Butler is a good mismatch & he's still sitting out there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MJS said:

Yeldin is pretty much a nobody at this point in his career. Received practically zero interest in free agency and saw his offensive importance shrink and shrink in Jacksonville.

Which begs the question, why did the Bills sign him then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFan130 said:

Which begs the question, why did the Bills sign him then? 

 

Because 30+ year old RB’s don’t hold up well.  Kind of ridiculous we are paying McCoy $6m this season.  Beane must be worried about the locker room impact of letting McCoy go.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look.. this 2019 draft is certainly not special like the  2016 Doug Whaley /Rex  draft with 3 starters off the bus in Lawson, Rags and Washington,  but if Beane can do a deep day 3 dive and come up with another Kolby Listenbee then we might be able to salvage something..

  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

What you are saying is moronic. THEY GAVE UP ONE NET PICK. You are saying that if I paid somebody twenty dollars and got ten dollars back from somebody else, I am out twenty dollars. 

That's not spin. It's elementary math. What a fool. 

I hate Doug Whaley for bringing this crap discussion to the fanbase. After the Watkins trade, Whaley's ***** lice took to the internet to Clintonize the definition of "give up," in an effort to defend the deity that was Doug by minimizing the price of moving up.

 

I doubt this conversation takes place elsewhere, and it's embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, scribo said:

Gotta love the know-it-all arm-chair GMs. We have national media falling over themselves to praise the Bills for their draft picks and free agency acquisitions. Yet the posters here think their "work" with YouTube videos have them in better position to evaluate talent.

And if it was reverse, people would be trashing the national media. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rob's House said:

I hate Doug Whaley for bringing this crap discussion to the fanbase. After the Watkins trade, Whaley's ***** lice took to the internet to Clintonize the definition of "give up," in an effort to defend the deity that was Doug by minimizing the price of moving up.

 

I doubt this conversation takes place elsewhere, and it's embarrassing.

Yeah, the Zay trade up was genius. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

No, it's not the only way to handle it. Plenty of teams take a ton of picks. Cincy had 11 last year, Denver had 10, Green Bay had 11, and I'm only up to the Gs, in one draft. That wasn't "what those 4th rounders were there for." They were there to be maximized. Could've been used, or traded for more picks, or whatever.

 

You don't have to get all that lucky to do well with a later pick. Milano was a 5th. Taron Johnson too. Fourths especially have a pretty reasonable record of producing contributors. The more picks the better, but if you have a better use for them, that's OK too. So far, this regime has been excellent at the draft, so I'm willing to believe them that this stands a decent chance of being a very good use of the picks.

I can get behind this too... but I get the guy's argument of the 4th rd picks... I'd rather them use those lower picks to get better picks rather then drafting Ray Ray McCould & Austin Proehl who's not even on the team anymore. 

 

If they can take those 2 7th's along with their 5th... to move back into the 4th...& draft Hakeem Butler... then awesome! I'll take that all day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Unless they trade their 5th & 6th to move to 4th, Butler will be gone and everyone else left is just wr meh....Love our first 2 picks and Singletary will be intriguing. Dawson creek Knox landing was too expensive. 

Considering the Pats*** were going to take him until we snuck ahead of them to grab Knox instead, I’d say two 4ths to move up 16 spots while at the same time screwing our most despised division rival is a small price to pay. And when Knox develops and pans out as a good TE, nobody will give a crap about those two fourth round picks, anyway.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, K-9 said:

Considering the Pats*** were going to take him until we snuck ahead of them to grab Knox instead, I’d say two 4ths to move up 16 spots while at the same time screwing our most despised division rival is a small price to pay. And when Knox develops and pans out as a good TE, nobody will give a crap about those two fourth round picks, anyway.

Link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Scorp83 said:

15 years ago....yea... now they've probably WAY MORE credible then Mel Kiper & his ESPN crew. They do some good work like NDT.com 

 

Calm down skip, that’s why I was asking - I know BR has some legit trustworthy content creators now - I just wanted more info on this particular guy because I wasn’t familiar with him.

 

BR was founded in ‘07, and has been a cesspool for most of its existence, so not sure where you’re getting your “15 years” from by the way chief. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

 

Because 30+ year old RB’s don’t hold up well.  Kind of ridiculous we are paying McCoy $6m this season.  Beane must be worried about the locker room impact of letting McCoy go.  

He's not your average 30 year old RB, great RB's don't slow down when they hit 30. Shady still has a good 2-3 seasons in him to hit 1200 yards rushing & catch 50 passes. Plus his $6M isn't hurting our cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rob's House said:

Are you just throwing out non sequiturs or do you have a point?

They traded up to get a guy they wanted instead of staying put and taking JuJu or Kupp.  I’d not that mad about the trade up (not a huge fan of the guy that got) but it happens all the time. You trade up for a guy and there are better option that are available.  They have a lot of picks but I look at each one as a potential lottery ticket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, C.Biscuit97 said:

They traded up to get a guy they wanted instead of staying put and taking JuJu or Kupp.  I’d not that mad about the trade up (not a huge fan of the guy that got) but it happens all the time. You trade up for a guy and there are better option that are available.  They have a lot of picks but I look at each one as a potential lottery ticket. 

Not the point of the post you responded to, but that's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, C.Biscuit97 said:

Link?

Yeah, I’m sure it was just a coincidence that right after we jumped ahead of them and selected Knox at 96, the Pats***, with the whole world knowing they were looking to add a good TE prospect, immediately traded out of the 97th pick. 

 

Are going to insist on playing the “link” game every time a logical argument is presented? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, K-9 said:

Yeah, I’m sure it was just a coincidence that right after we jumped ahead of them and selected Knox at 96, the Pats***, with the whole world knowing they were looking to add a good TE prospect, immediately traded out of the 97th pick. 

 

Are going to insist on playing the “link” game every time a logical argument is presented? 

Ok, so you had nothing. I was genuinely asking if you had information.  It was a guess by you. Don’t be salty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...