GG Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Sorry, Jerry and Adam Is that one dissenting judge the same as the dentist who recommends gum with sugar? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 They can release the summaries like yesterday. Those are being withheld, and media reports indicate they were created with the intention of being able to be released post haste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 (edited) 14 hours ago, Doc Brown said: I wouldn't trust Trump to pass the collection plate at church without taking money from it. Barr, however, will follow the law to a tee. I"d trust Trump before I trusted Slick Willie and his fake-marriage gun-moll how can you liberals STILL not 100% grasp this? or at least try to comprehend it??? Edited April 5, 2019 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They can release the summaries like yesterday. Those are being withheld, and media reports indicate they were created with the intention of being able to be released post haste. No, no they can't. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-04/justice-department-defends-process-for-handling-mueller-report "Two people familiar with the matter said the summaries in Mueller’s report had markings indicating that some parts had to be reviewed and withheld, potentially including information related to grand jury proceedings." I ran across someone else that knows you: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: No, no they can't. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-04/justice-department-defends-process-for-handling-mueller-report "Two people familiar with the matter said the summaries in Mueller’s report had markings indicating that some parts had to be reviewed and withheld, potentially including information related to grand jury proceedings." I ran across someone else that knows you: Ha ha, ok, then I guess they should spend the 15 minutes or so it would take to redact that information. Ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 47 minutes ago, Tiberius said: ... and media reports indicate they were created with the intention of being able to be released post haste. @Tiberius on crack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 hour ago, row_33 said: I"d trust Trump before I trusted Slick Willie and his fake-marriage gun-moll how can you liberals STILL not 100% grasp this? or at least try to comprehend it??? It's possible to despise both presidents. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 12 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: It's possible to despise both presidents. i don't despise any Presidents, they usually lead/meld perfectly with the public's demand from their persona Carter was the only one of the my lifetime who truly was in totally over his head, but after Watergate and Nam the US gets a pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, row_33 said: i don't despise any Presidents, they usually lead/meld perfectly with the public's demand from their persona Carter was the only one of the my lifetime who truly was in totally over his head, but after Watergate and Nam the US gets a pass. Personally I despise W Bush for getting us into an un necessary costly war resulting in 6,000+ dead Americans and 1,000,000+ brown people on a bald faced out and out pre meditated LIE. Iraq and the rest of middle east is still in shambles and are and will continue to pay the freight for it for quite some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 hour ago, reddogblitz said: Personally I despise W Bush for getting us into an un necessary costly war resulting in 6,000+ dead Americans and 1,000,000+ brown people on a bald faced out and out pre meditated LIE. Iraq and the rest of middle east is still in shambles and are and will continue to pay the freight for it for quite some time. I understand 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 6, 2019 Share Posted April 6, 2019 1 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 6, 2019 Share Posted April 6, 2019 On 4/4/2019 at 10:06 PM, John from Riverside said: Just show the report They are. They have to do it in a way that is compliant with the law; further, the Democrats clamoring for its immediate release know this. They’re trying to manipulate you, weaponizing your ignorance of the law. Ask yourself why they’d do this, then ask yourself why you’d trust someone who does this to be honest with you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 https://news.yahoo.com/court-barr-must-redact-grand-214050275.html Good article on a recent DC Circuit Court ruling about the government not being allowed to turn over Grand Jury testimony to anyone outside of the narrowly-defined exceptions - even Congress. Also points out that if the Democrats in Congress don't like it, they do actually have the authority to pass legislation to change the rule. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 7, 2019 Author Share Posted April 7, 2019 Wait. What? Still NO COLLUSION! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 What will Pence be like as President when Trump leaves the White House next week in handcuffs when Mueller proves treason! oh wait, Pence will have to go too, then Hillary can be President, what a day of rejoicing that will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 32 minutes ago, row_33 said: What will Pence be like as President when Trump leaves the White House next week in handcuffs when Mueller proves treason! oh wait, Pence will have to go too, then Hillary can be President, what a day of rejoicing that will be. No, that's not the order of succession. Nancy Pelosi is next in line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, Nanker said: Wait. What? Still NO COLLUSION! There is. It's just buried under the mandatory redactions, because Barr is Trump's "hand picked" "fixer" who is "pouncing" on stuff. There's even anonymous sources citing unnamed methods that heard about it 4th hand from someone with knowledge that says so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 7, 2019 Author Share Posted April 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: There is. It's just buried under the mandatory redactions, because Barr is Trump's "hand picked" "fixer" who is "pouncing" on stuff. There's even anonymous sources citing unnamed methods that heard about it 4th hand from someone with knowledge that says so! Hmmm. Why can't the Dems hand pick their own fixer? Doesn't seem fair now, does it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: No, that's not the order of succession. Nancy Pelosi is next in line. He was just skipping a few steps. First President Nancy will appoint Hillary as her VP, then immediately resign, thus giving the White House to Hillary for life! Just now, Nanker said: Hmmm. Why can't the Dems hand pick their own fixer? Doesn't seem fair now, does it. There are two sets of rules, one for the evil, nasty, vile, Republicans, and one for the pure, virtuous, innocent, Democrats. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts