Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 12:44 AM, Keukasmallies said:

Do the folks in the hustings really want the members of the majority party in Congress to spend all their time doing f&%#-all investigations?  Why not set up an investigations panel if they must, but let the majority of the time in session concentrate on, Oh I don't know, maybe the work of the people who elected them?

 

Time one party and/or the other pulled up their big boy pants and went to work.

Expand  

That's the role of the House Oversight Committee.  Both parties have abused it over the years ad nauseam to score political points.  

Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 8:40 AM, Doc Brown said:

That's the role of the House Oversight Committee.  Both parties have abused it over the years ad nauseam to score political points.  

Expand  

 

Yet it has worked to the detriment of each party on multiple occasions. I think most voters are sick of "gotcha politics." Politicians on both sides seemingly haven't figured this out yet.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 9:02 AM, Golden Goat said:

 

Yet it has worked to the detriment of each party on multiple occasions. I think most voters are sick of "gotcha politics." Politicians on both sides seemingly haven't figured this out yet.

Expand  

I don't think so. Transparency is something overdo with this administration and Democrats are going to provide it. You just think people are tired of it because they are not doing pointless investigations of Hillary now. That's all. 

Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 1:04 PM, Tiberius said:

I don't think so. Transparency is something overdo with this administration and Democrats are going to provide it. You just think people are tired of it because they are not doing pointless investigations of Hillary now. That's all. 

Expand  

What? What transparency are you looking for? The Trump Administration has turned over more documents to investigators than any previous administration. What exactly would like to see? And why? 

Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 1:09 PM, SoCal Deek said:

What? What transparency are you looking for? The Trump Administration has turned over more documents to investigators than any previous administration. What exactly would like to see? And why? 

Expand  

Hey! That's funny! 

 

Tax returns to determine if there has been money laundering, tax fraud, insurance fraud, banking fraud. Whitewater, look out! 

 

The story behind Jared Kushner's security clearance 

 

Trump's charity foundation (now defunct) and where the money went 

 

Trump's super expensive inaugural and where the money came from and went 

 

 

Why? Corruption and to nail his azz to the wall of course. He might go to jail! 

Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 1:09 PM, SoCal Deek said:

What? What transparency are you looking for? The Trump Administration has turned over more documents to investigators than any previous administration. What exactly would like to see? And why? 

Expand  

 

I think you’re new here but let me give you some advice. Asking Tibs reasonable questions is a sure fire way to have an adult call you poopy pants. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

He's not wrong (because that is all it is), but I don't think saying it out loud (and twitter is his shoutbox) is a good look. On the other hand, he's got pretty good instincts, so I could be wrong:
 

 

Posted (edited)
  On 3/5/2019 at 2:24 PM, Buffalo_Gal said:

He's not wrong (because that is all it is), but I don't think saying it out loud (and twitter is his shoutbox) is a good look. On the other hand, he's got pretty good instincts, so I could be wrong:
 

 

Expand  

 

He cares to speak to his entrenched base, not the rest of the country. 

 

That is truly a shame because he has done a lot of good things. And I appreciate them. 

 

But I still loathe his “leadership.” 

 

The presidential wah-mbulance is a weak and lame look. 

Edited by BeginnersMind
Posted (edited)
  On 3/5/2019 at 3:22 PM, DC Tom said:

 

:lol: Yeah, I kind-of forgot that he was done in 2009, not 2007.

Expand  

 

You gave me 12 years. Phew. 

 

I almost said Obama by the words he used. He made sweeping speeches. But they were always through gritted teeth and his actions and other words undercut him. Trump doesn’t even try. 

 

Obama would be a pompous ass to hang out with. Trump would be a narcissistic prick. Bush and Bill Clinton would be fun. 

Edited by BeginnersMind
Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 1:04 PM, Tiberius said:

I don't think so. Transparency is something overdo with this administration and Democrats are going to provide it. You just think people are tired of it because they are not doing pointless investigations of Hillary now. That's all. 

Expand  

 

You could have stopped after your first three words. That is your MO around here, especially when you're frustrated and triggered. <3

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/5/2019 at 3:40 PM, BeginnersMind said:

 

You gave me 12 years. Phew. 

 

I almost said Obama by the words he used. He made sweeping speeches. But they were always through gritted teeth and his actions and other words undercut him. Trump doesn’t even try. 

 

Obama would be a pompous ass to hang out with. Trump would be a narcissistic prick. Bush and Bill Clinton would be fun. 

Expand  

 

I think Trump might be okay to hang out with; I suspect he's less annoying in private than his public persona.  I'd still rather juggle live honey badgers.

 

Obama's just the sort of smug that would annoy the hell out of me.  But I bet Bill would be a hell of a wingman.

×
×
  • Create New...