Jump to content

Hate Crime or Hoax?


The_Dude

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 946
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

uh huh
 

Special prosecutor finds ‘substantial abuses of discretion’ in Jussie Smollett case as he concludes investigation
 

Special Prosecutor Dan Webb did not find evidence to support filing criminal charges against Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx or any other prosecutor.
 

Special Prosecutor Dan Webb laid out a series of “operational failures” — and several false statements by Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx — as he announced on Monday the end of his investigation into the handling of hate crime claims by actor Jussie Smollett.
 

Webb said Foxx and her staff made false or misleading statements about her declared recusal from the case, about how the Smollett case compared to others in the court system, about the certainty of a conviction for Smollett, and about her contacts with Smollett’s sister, actor Jurnee Smollett.
 

But Webb also said he did not find evidence that the case was improperly influenced by third parties such as Tina Tchen, the onetime chief of staff to former first lady Michelle Obama, nor did he find evidence that would support criminal charges.
 

</snip>


Still, there are more shoes left to potentially drop. Webb said Monday he would seek permission “as soon as possible” from Cook County Judge Michael Toomin to release a 60-page report that supports his findings with evidence. He also said he intends to forward the report to Illinois’ Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

More on the above:

 

The Trayvon Hoax.

So here’s the documentary itself. Please be patient, and I think your patience will be rewarded.

 

The importance of the Zimmerman/Martin case cannot be overemphasized. It’s the event that was the kickstarter for the organization BLM and the spreading of the leftist narrative about innocent blacks being killed in droves by cops.

 

That’s a bit ironic, because Zimmerman wasn’t a cop. But he was considered a quasi-cop (and a quasi-white, since he’s half Hispanic).

Video at link.

 

 

NEO: 

I missed some news that came out in late 2019, something I’m just coming across now. In the not-too-distant future, I hope to post a longer piece or two connected with it. It concerns allegations that are not only mind-blowing but could end up being important, if they ever get a proper airing and proper coverage. I’m talking about The Trayvon Hoax, which refers to the claim that the prosecution’s case against George Zimmerman was built almost entirely on a fraud in which they substituted a fake witness for the real one.

 

That seems preposterous, I know. It seems it should be impossible to get away with such a thing, especially with all the scrutiny the case received. The story is complicated and takes a while to set out and digest. The man who’s promoting this is a documentary filmmaker named Joel Gilbert, who’s been connected previously with some iffy theories. So he’s easily dismissed by the left, and hard to take all that seriously.

 

Until you watch the documentary or read his book, that is.

 

I haven’t done the latter, but I’ve done the former. The video is two hours long, and some of it could easily have been cut to tighten it up, which I think would be an improvement. Nevertheless, by the time I was finished watching, I felt that Gilbert had presented a remarkably compelling and comprehensive case, which was not my initial expectation at all.

 

Nor has anyone refuted it, although he started this tack in the fall so they’ve had plenty of time. Oh, they’ve excoriated him (and Zimmerman) plenty. But I could find nothing that dealt with the heart of the actual research he’s done and the allegations he’s making.

 

As I’ve said, I plan to write more about this. But I decided to put this post up rather quickly, to give you an idea of what I’m talking about, as well as an opportunity to watch the video if you’re not already familiar with it.

 

 

 

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

More on the above:

 

The Trayvon Hoax.

So here’s the documentary itself. Please be patient, and I think your patience will be rewarded.

 

The importance of the Zimmerman/Martin case cannot be overemphasized. It’s the event that was the kickstarter for the organization BLM and the spreading of the leftist narrative about innocent blacks being killed in droves by cops.

 

That’s a bit ironic, because Zimmerman wasn’t a cop. But he was considered a quasi-cop (and a quasi-white, since he’s half Hispanic).

Video at link.

 

 

NEO: 

I missed some news that came out in late 2019, something I’m just coming across now. In the not-too-distant future, I hope to post a longer piece or two connected with it. It concerns allegations that are not only mind-blowing but could end up being important, if they ever get a proper airing and proper coverage. I’m talking about The Trayvon Hoax, which refers to the claim that the prosecution’s case against George Zimmerman was built almost entirely on a fraud in which they substituted a fake witness for the real one.

 

That seems preposterous, I know. It seems it should be impossible to get away with such a thing, especially with all the scrutiny the case received. The story is complicated and takes a while to set out and digest. The man who’s promoting this is a documentary filmmaker named Joel Gilbert, who’s been connected previously with some iffy theories. So he’s easily dismissed by the left, and hard to take all that seriously.

 

Until you watch the documentary or read his book, that is.

 

I haven’t done the latter, but I’ve done the former. The video is two hours long, and some of it could easily have been cut to tighten it up, which I think would be an improvement. Nevertheless, by the time I was finished watching, I felt that Gilbert had presented a remarkably compelling and comprehensive case, which was not my initial expectation at all.

 

Nor has anyone refuted it, although he started this tack in the fall so they’ve had plenty of time. Oh, they’ve excoriated him (and Zimmerman) plenty. But I could find nothing that dealt with the heart of the actual research he’s done and the allegations he’s making.

 

As I’ve said, I plan to write more about this. But I decided to put this post up rather quickly, to give you an idea of what I’m talking about, as well as an opportunity to watch the video if you’re not already familiar with it.

 

 

 

 

 

I followed the Trayvon Martin case quite closely as it was being played out. It seemed to me that the prosecution never had a case so I was waiting for the big shoe to drop (during the trial) that never came about. Nothing done by the prosecution would surprise me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

What told me it was a hoax was that Martin had the ability to just go home and avoid a confrontation.  He didn't.

Not to split hairs but he did go to his father's house but then returned to where GZ was parked. That blew apart the narrative that tried to make it as if GZ hunted down TM in order to harm him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...