Augie Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 2:11 AM, Zebrastripes said: You're not right about this. Ball wasn't tipped and the receiver was just beyond the LOS. Expand The ball MAY have been tipped, and he was almost exactly a yard past the LOS, as I saw it. 2
bbb Posted November 5, 2018 Author Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 2:16 AM, Boatdrinks said: It was the league’s way of not saying “ you can longer chuck a WR ever”. Remember , this used to be allowed all the way down the field as recently as the 70’s. It’s part of the reason why QBs have put up pinball numbers . Expand But not when the ball was in the air, was it?
Boatdrinks Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 2:19 AM, bbb said: But not when the ball was in the air, was it? Expand No , I don’t believe it was allowed once the ball was thrown, but it had a huge impact on running routes.
bbb Posted November 5, 2018 Author Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 2:20 AM, Boatdrinks said: No , I don’t believe it was allowed once the ball was thrown, but it had a huge impact on running routes. Expand Yeah, no doubt about that.
thebandit27 Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 Always been the rule I had zero doubt that Fuller made a legal play
Kirby Jackson Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 You have to live the 1 yard hitch on 3rd and 3. The Bilks really should run more routes short of the marker. ?
Dadonkadonk Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 1:48 AM, buffalobillswin said: That works both ways too. A lot of teams do the pick play on offense within one yard and they can't call offensive pass interference Expand Stop giving out accurate information. People on here aren't interested. 1
K-9 Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 (edited) On 11/5/2018 at 1:40 AM, PittsforDave said: Ball was clearly tipped...and reciever was clearly behind the LOS... No penalty. ReWatch the game and see for yourself. Expand If the ball was tipped, the ref would have announced that there was no interfence for that reason, as we’ve seen countless times over the years. Instead he announced there was no interference because the receiver was within one yard of the line of scrimmage. Edited November 5, 2018 by K-9 4
row_33 Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 1:48 AM, buffalobillswin said: That works both ways too. A lot of teams do the pick play on offense within one yard and they can't call offensive pass interference Expand Every decent offence uses this on most passing downs, watch how the Pats do it all the time for their benefit Bills fans cry it’s an illegal pick because Buffalo hasn’t bother implementing it at all
SoCal Deek Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 Geeez people the ruling was as the OP pointed out! Apparently...you can hit the receiver within one yard of the line of scrimmage. While the rule seems ridiculous I’m guessing it exists so that it’s not ruled pass interference if the defense is contacting a receiver who’s actually really just blocking and the QB happens to throw the ball towards him. But...in this case it didn’t really seem to fit the INTENT of the rule. The receiver was clearly running a route, with some separation, and the defender purposely ran into him before the ball arrived. IMHO it’s another rule that needs tweaking. 1
row_33 Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 1:14 PM, SoCal Deek said: Geeez people the ruling was as the OP pointed out! Apparently...you can hit the receiver within one yard of the line of scrimmage. While the rule seems ridiculous I’m guessing it exists so that it’s not ruled pass interference if the defense is contacting a receiver who’s actually really just blocking and the QB happens to throw the ball towards him. But...in this case it didn’t really seem to fit the INTENT of the rule. The receiver was clearly running a route, with some separation, and the defender purposely ran into him before the ball arrived. IMHO it’s another rule that needs tweaking. Expand the Bills plan to get to using this rule to their advantage by 2030 1 1
bbb Posted November 5, 2018 Author Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 1:14 PM, SoCal Deek said: Geeez people the ruling was as the OP pointed out! Apparently...you can hit the receiver within one yard of the line of scrimmage. While the rule seems ridiculous I’m guessing it exists so that it’s not ruled pass interference if the defense is contacting a receiver who’s actually really just blocking and the QB happens to throw the ball towards him. But...in this case it didn’t really seem to fit the INTENT of the rule. The receiver was clearly running a route, with some separation, and the defender purposely ran into him before the ball arrived. IMHO it’s another rule that needs tweaking. Expand On 11/5/2018 at 5:57 PM, 26CornerBlitz said: Expand Thanks and thanks. 1
billrooter Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 12:58 AM, PittsforDave said: Ball was tipped, he was behind the LOS. common knowledge, no penalty. Expand I didn't think it was tipped and wasn't it a yard over? I realize since it was tipped he could be hit but did not realize it was tipped? 1
26CornerBlitz Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 8:26 PM, billrooter said: I didn't think it was tipped and wasn't it a yard over? I realize since it was tipped he could be hit but did not realize it was tipped? Expand It was not tipped. 1
Soda Popinski Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 CBs have always been allowed to jam within 1 yard at the LOS. That's nothing new.
billrooter Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 8:31 PM, Soda Popinski said: CBs have always been allowed to jam within 1 yard at the LOS. That's nothing new. Expand Jam but he hit his hip, didn't jam him at the line, hit his hip and knocked him kind of sideways.
Soda Popinski Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 8:33 PM, billrooter said: Jam but he hit his hip, didn't jam him at the line, hit his hip and knocked him kind of sideways. Expand contact is contact within 1 yard. The two hits to Peterman's head that were not called, those mattered more IMO than this.
billrooter Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 8:34 PM, Soda Popinski said: contact is contact within 1 yard. The two hits to Peterman's head that were not called, those mattered more IMO than this. Expand Not sure how either one mattered more than this, this play was a pick six. Bump and run is getting your hand on the receivers shoulder pad/chest and bumping him, not knocking his body sideways by hitting his hip, IMO this was different.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 5, 2018 Posted November 5, 2018 On 11/5/2018 at 8:37 PM, billrooter said: Not sure how either one mattered more than this, this play was a pick six. Bump and run is getting your hand on the receivers shoulder pad/chest and bumping him, not knocking his body sideways by hitting his hip, IMO this was different. Expand It doesn't matter.
Recommended Posts