Nanker Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: You are not the first person to accuse me of this. That's because I have to stick to the cover story. If it were true, it wouldn't be such a consistent story. Wake up, sheeple! I knew it. I KNEW IT!!! 1 hour ago, GG said: I have to get in the game Well, you’d better put on your dancing shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 36 minutes ago, LaDexter said: As a self proclaimed EYEWITNESS, you didn't give a statement?? LOL!!! You were not an "evewitness." You were already estimating your 911 profit when the markets opened next.... Explain how you saw a 757 fit through this hole.... You mean this hole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 36 minutes ago, DC Tom said: You mean this hole? You stupid ****! You didn’t photoshop out the Israeli flag in the foreground!!! Oy vey! You could get kicked out of the Mossad for that you mashugana goy! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 What if it was a cruise missile mocked up to look like an airplane, complete with Otto sitting up front? How about a cruise missile inside an airplane? Actually, Tom mentioned L Ron Hubbard earlier. I think he was onto something: DC Tom ---> Cruise missile ---> Tom Cruise 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 22, 2018 Author Share Posted June 22, 2018 Funny, I don't see anything resembling a 757 in that photo.... 1 hour ago, Nanker said: You stupid ****! You didn’t photoshop out the Israeli flag in the foreground!!! Well. we did have these Mossad dancing on 911.... http://www.todayscatholicworld.com/mossad-agents-911.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv5s_VEmZd0 and this is what "Bibi" had to say.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 5 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Funny, I don't see anything resembling a 757 in that photo.... No, you see a hole big enough to be caused by one. And you wouldn't see a 757, you'd see wreckage. Which is in the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 22, 2018 Author Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: you wouldn't see a 757 Nobody not a Hebrew speaking Zionist Traitor knee deep in defense stocks saw a "757" because it wasn't a "757" and that is why there are no "757" parts in the photo. Several other photos were subjected to CHOSEN PhotoShopping but they are as credible as the early photos of Col Ossman, which were Bin Laden's face mounted on a military uniform... What caused that hole? Tom won't answer, because the hole is precisely where the "object" hits... and its is WAY too small to fit a 757... Edited June 22, 2018 by LaDexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Nobody not a Hebrew speaking Zionist Traitor knee deep in defense stocks saw a "757" because it wasn't a "757" and that is why there are no "757" parts in the photo. Several other photos were subjected to CHOSEN PhotoShopping but they are as credible as the early photos of Col Ossman, which were Bin Laden's face mounted on a military uniform... What caused that hole? Tom won't answer, because the hole is precisely where the "object" hits... and its is WAY too small to fit a 757... That's not where it hit. The picture I shared is where it hit. I know this because I saw it. I know you're picture's fake because there weren't any "No Parking" signs on the Pentagon helipad, which is where the plane hit. And before you link to Google Maps to show me that the helipad is somewhere else...they movet it after 9/11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 22, 2018 Author Share Posted June 22, 2018 So that hole just magically appeared to give "truthers" something to talk about.... Never mind... 1. the "US" media never showed the video of the "757" hitting the Pentagon 2. the "pilots for truth" group formed simply over how ridiculous the "official" explanation is 3. when big commercial passenger jets crash, there is jet debris all over the place, but there is none here 4. a "757" is not a projectile, it is a floating soda can designed for gas mileage 5. whatever hit the Pentagon crashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside Every American needs to see this... especially the 0:37 frame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 52 minutes ago, LaDexter said: So that hole just magically appeared to give "truthers" something to talk about.... Never mind... 1. the "US" media never showed the video of the "757" hitting the Pentagon 2. the "pilots for truth" group formed simply over how ridiculous the "official" explanation is 3. when big commercial passenger jets crash, there is jet debris all over the place, but there is none here 4. a "757" is not a projectile, it is a floating soda can designed for gas mileage 5. whatever hit the Pentagon crashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside Every American needs to see this... especially the 0:37 frame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 hour ago, LaDexter said: So that hole just magically appeared to give "truthers" something to talk about.... Never mind... 1. the "US" media never showed the video of the "757" hitting the Pentagon 2. the "pilots for truth" group formed simply over how ridiculous the "official" explanation is 3. when big commercial passenger jets crash, there is jet debris all over the place, but there is none here 4. a "757" is not a projectile, it is a floating soda can designed for gas mileage 5. whatever hit the Pentagon crashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside Every American needs to see this... especially the 0:37 frame Do you even realize you're arguing that a hole was to small for a plane collision that wouldn't make any hole at all? On behalf of the Zionist-Bilderberger-Illuminati Axis, we'd appreciate it if your stupidity were at least self-consistent. Save your contradictory retardedness for the Reptoids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 hour ago, LaDexter said: So that hole just magically appeared to give "truthers" something to talk about.... Never mind... 1. the "US" media never showed the video of the "757" hitting the Pentagon 2. the "pilots for truth" group formed simply over how ridiculous the "official" explanation is 3. when big commercial passenger jets crash, there is jet debris all over the place, but there is none here 4. a "757" is not a projectile, it is a floating soda can designed for gas mileage 5. whatever hit the Pentagon crashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside Every American needs to see this... especially the 0:37 frame . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 3 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Is that michael jewson? I love the dancing jews! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 4 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Little known fact: that's not dancing, that's a coded Haganah communications method. Jews talk to each other like bees. He's telling other Jews to avoid the 2013 Boston Marathon. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Little known fact: that's not dancing, that's a coded Haganah communications method. Jews talk to each other like bees. He's telling other Jews to avoid the 2013 Boston Marathon. Worked for me on 9/11 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 12 hours ago, LaDexter said: So that hole just magically appeared to give "truthers" something to talk about.... Never mind... 1. the "US" media never showed the video of the "757" hitting the Pentagon 2. the "pilots for truth" group formed simply over how ridiculous the "official" explanation is 3. when big commercial passenger jets crash, there is jet debris all over the place, but there is none here 4. a "757" is not a projectile, it is a floating soda can designed for gas mileage 5. whatever hit the Pentagon crashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside Every American needs to see this... especially the 0:37 frame I don't know if you're doing this as a joke or what, but there is absolutely no doubt that an American Airlines 757 hit the Pentagon that day. You seem to be oblivious to the evidence. The "hole" is the exact size of the fuselage of a 757. 757 parts, specific to that particular airplane were recovered on the lawn and in the building. Specifically, the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder were recovered. So was a landing gear strut from the the main gear with a serial number that matched that airplane. The oft pictured compressor which is claimed to be way too small to be from a Rolls Royce engine that American used to power their 757's isn't from the engine. It is from the Aux Power Unit, which all 757's have and which is in the tail, used to provide ground electrical and air for the heat/AC units. American Airlines uniforms and a lot of DNA was recovered, and directly proven to be from the crew, passengers and terrorists. A great deal of effort was expended to keep the DNA separate for burial purposes. The reason parts are on the lawn is because the airplane actually hit the ground just prior to the building. There were scores of eyewitnesses who identified it as an American 757, easily identified because of American's polished aluminum fuselage. Anyway, there's a lot more evidence, but its a little more complicated and not worth typing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 Snopes fact check version: with picture The plane banked sharply and came in so low that it clipped light poles. It slammed into the side of the Pentagon at an estimated 350 miles per hour after first hitting the helipad. The plane penetrated the outer three rings of the building. The jet fuel exploded, which sent a fireball outward from the impact point. About 30 minutes after the crash, a cross-section of the building collapsed, but only after enough time had elapsed for rescue workers to evacuate all injured employees. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hunt-the-boeing/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 3 hours ago, ALF said: Snopes fact check version: with picture It slammed into the side of the Pentagon at an estimated 350 miles per hour after first hitting the helipad. Closer to 500mph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 For all those who were not here back in 2001, Tom was on here within a day or two telling us how he saw the plane pass right over his apartment not far from the Pentagon and seconds later seeing it hit. I know someone from high school who was assigned as an audiologist at the Pentagon getting an award for tending to injured people after the impact. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts