NoSaint Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, Big C said: For a third. Dang. It’s seemed to be a third for awhile now... just a matter if who would have the highest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeF Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 21 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: They added a 5th and a 7th so now have a 3rd, 4th, 2 5th, 6th and a 7th. They may still love around the board. Hopefully they can get an OL and a WR at 96 and 121. Maybe something like Tyrell Crosby and Dante Pettis? As always you hit the nail on the head today Kirby with a post. Superstars come in the top of the first round. The second and third rounds are Preston Browns. While we may not like the QB pick -- getting Edmunds follows that philosophy. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted April 27, 2018 Author Share Posted April 27, 2018 Following the trades, here is a look at the picks that Buffalo has remaining on Friday and Saturday in the draft. Day Two (Rounds 2-3) No. 96 Day Three (Rounds 4-7) No. 121 No. 154 No. 166 No. 187 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 35 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: They added a 5th and a 7th so now have a 3rd, 4th, 2 5th, 6th and a 7th. They may still move around the board. Hopefully they can get an OL and a WR at 96 and 121. Maybe something like Tyrell Crosby and Dante Pettis? Three 5ths, ours Jacksonville's and Baltimore's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Any way we can make a trade for Will Hernandez? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 55 minutes ago, Billznut said: Losing 53, 56 and 65 hurts, especially in this draft where the 2nd and 3rd round was supposedly very strong. If Allen and Edmunds end up being star players it was worth it. Otherwise...Ouch Using 5 picks to choose Allen and Edmunds is definitely an ouch. God, I hate trading up. Losing 53, 56, and 65 is not good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Nails Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Great. We can take the next ed Wang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Domdab99 said: Using 5 picks to choose Allen and Edmunds is definitely an ouch. God, I hate trading up. Losing 53, 56, and 65 is not good. That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and got it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too). Edited April 27, 2018 by Kirby Jackson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterbluesky Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Following the trades, here is a look at the picks that Buffalo has remaining on Friday and Saturday in the draft. Day Two (Rounds 2-3) No. 96 Day Three (Rounds 4-7) No. 121 No. 154 No. 166 No. 187 Not so fast... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted April 27, 2018 Author Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, Kirby Jackson said: That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and for it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too). ARZ got better value for Rosen by giving up only a 3rd and a 5th. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, Kirby Jackson said: That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and for it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too). I see your point. I just hate trading up lol! As much as I hated the Allen pick, I'll get on board and pull for him. I hope he can become something. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterbluesky Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: ARZ got better value for Rosen by giving up only a 3rd and a 5th. Rosen dropped for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 OL, DT, another LB, a WR. We're coming out this draft with many holes even though we entered with 6 picks in the first 3 rounds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: That’s why they got these picks. I don’t love Allen but they went and got their guy at a decent price. Edmunds had no business being on the board and they jumped. He was thought to be a top 10 lock. They saw a potential star, at a position of need, and for it done. I’ll never complain about taking impact players. Bodies are nice but you win with stars. Edmunds could be that (Allen could too). And the value for Edmunds made sense too, in terms of what we gave up. I wish I could say the same about Allen. I think we have seen an MO for Brandon Beane tonight and it is measurables and ceiling. McDermott had a slightly different MO last year so that is at least interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted April 27, 2018 Author Share Posted April 27, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said: Rosen dropped for a reason. Dropped? He was drafted 3 picks later. Some drop. Edited April 27, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K-GunJimKelly12 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Edmunds was worth it. There is a pretty decent chance that he will be the superstar stud linebacker we need for this defense. Vander Esch and Evans went shortly after so that says to me that the needed to trade up there to get the guy they wanted. Allen? We will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickelCity Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Misterbluesky said: Rosen dropped for a reason. True. Those wacky Bills we all love so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: And the value for Edmunds made sense too, in terms of what we gave up. I wish I could say the same about Allen. I think we have seen an MO for Brandon Beane tonight and it is measurables and ceiling. McDermott had a slightly different MO last year so that is at least interesting. If they said Rosen instead of Allen I would be on cloud 9. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterbluesky Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Dropped? he was drafted 3 picks later. Some drop. Three picks in the early first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said: If they said Rosen instead of Allen I would be on cloud 9. Likewise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts