Wayne Arnold Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Calling Jackson "Tyrod 2.0" is racist as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 12 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: Tyrod can manage games in the league. You can argue that he's had success because he learned to be so conservative. The same reason why he's frustrating. With Jackson's inaccuracy and technical issues, if he comes out guns blazing in the NFL, he might not even achieve what Taylor has. He had more success in college, but his NFL readiness is definitely comparable to Taylor. Those same weaknesses are why he's not considered a top 5 pick, despite the legendary college success. You just have to watch the games and listen to film review from knowledgeable people like Eric from Cover1 or Matt Waldman or Voch Lombardi has some good QB reviews. If your drafting Lamar Jackson you are pretty much conceding that the kid needs to hold the clipboard for a year but is that ANY different the. Josh allen? Rosen has concussion issues mayfield. My personal favorite is short and a hothead darnold can’t hold onto the bal So where exactly is the danger in this when the same dangers are there with every other draft eligible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mij yllek Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Saquon Barkley had 671 carries in his college career for 3843 yards and a 5.7 yd. ave. with 43 rushing TD's. He could go #1 overall. Lamar Jackson had 655 carries for 4132 yds. and a 6.3 yd. ave. with 50 rushing TD's. Why not get a decent QB and the best RB in the draft with one pick. Come playoff time on a snowy day in Buffalo with howling winds that make passing difficult, if not impossible, you still have a major weapon. Each and every week the opposing DC has to game plan to stop your QB from scoring anytime he gets into the open field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnbillsbacker Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 If the Bills like him they should take him at 12. The Bills lost Drew Brees because they wanted to draft Nate Clements first then trade back up for Brees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, auburnbillsbacker said: If the Bills like him they should take him at 12. The Bills lost Drew Brees because they wanted to draft Nate Clements first then trade back up for Brees. And Russell Wilson. Buddy Nix said they had a 4th rd grade on him and they were prepared to select him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatonka68 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 If the Bills traded Tyrod you really think they would draft a similar type QB? Petermen who the Bills are high on, and signed McCarron would so you what they are looking for. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 37 minutes ago, Tatonka68 said: If the Bills traded Tyrod you really think they would draft a similar type QB? Petermen who the Bills are high on, and signed McCarron would so you what they are looking for. It's like trading in your old Ferrari for a new one!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 He's a project. Projects shouldn't be taken in the first round. This, in my opinion, would be asinine. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 5 hours ago, Gugny said: He's a project. Projects shouldn't be taken in the first round. This, in my opinion, would be asinine. Josh Allen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 5 hours ago, Gugny said: He's a project. Projects shouldn't be taken in the first round. This, in my opinion, would be asinine. They are all projects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rad Likes The Bills Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 5 hours ago, Gugny said: He's a project. Projects shouldn't be taken in the first round. This, in my opinion, would be asinine. How is he a project? Put him around an nfl offense and watch his completion percentage sky rocket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalobloodfloridahome Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 I just don't think our current FO has any interest in a mobile QB. They seem to be gearing more towards pocket passers. Acquiring McCarron and having Peterman on the roster which both have decent athleticism for QB's says allot about the direction we are heading. Rosen, Darnold, Allen all fit even Rudolph fits the description. I think it is very unlikely we go that direction. Anybody who says I haven't seen him play and he is way underrated, I have watched him play and seen him run like a gazelle and has a cannon arm fun to watch wasn't overly impressed with his accuracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 39 minutes ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said: I just don't think our current FO has any interest in a mobile QB. They seem to be gearing more towards pocket passers. Acquiring McCarron and having Peterman on the roster which both have decent athleticism for QB's says allot about the direction we are heading. Rosen, Darnold, Allen all fit even Rudolph fits the description. I think it is very unlikely we go that direction. Anybody who says I haven't seen him play and he is way underrated, I have watched him play and seen him run like a gazelle and has a cannon arm fun to watch wasn't overly impressed with his accuracy. So they want a statue? Why wouldn't ANY NFL FO want a QB that can avoid/escape a pass rush? The best statuesque QB in the draft is probably Luke Falk. The reason his stock is so low is because he CANT avoid the rush. For the umpteenth time, Lamar Jackson is NOT a "run first/mobile QB"!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts