Jump to content

Bills last in league in snaps by home grown talent in 2017


Logic

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Logic said:



This was very interesting to me. It told me three things:

1.) The Bills need to build through the draft and do it well the next few years, as they've done an awful job at it of late. (This was obvious any way, right?)
2.) It's downright amazing that the Bills made the playoffs last year with the band-aided together roster they fielded. 
3.) Even if you DO draft well and your homegrown talent gets a lot of snaps, it's no guarantee of success. Cincinnatti, Cleveland, Dallas, and Green Bay missed the playoffs, despite being in the top 6.
 

 

Someone posts another variation of this stat every few months. It's the result of turning over regimes every 2-3 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the NFL should address the issue also from a fans perspective - the fans want to cheer for the players that they know - cheering for a player one year and then booing him the next is not good for retaining fans
They should give cap incentives to keep your own players - like after the first contract players that were drafter by a team count only  90% against the cap.
Players (like KW for example) who played for over 8 years in the league and the last 5 for the same team should count only 75% against the  cap if they sign with the same team
This way it gives the teams incentives to keep and grow their own talent and gives the fans continuity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BillsIsrael said:

I think the NFL should address the issue also from a fans perspective - the fans want to cheer for the players that they know - cheering for a player one year and then booing him the next is not good for retaining fans
They should give cap incentives to keep your own players - like after the first contract players that were drafter by a team count only  90% against the cap.
Players (like KW for example) who played for over 8 years in the league and the last 5 for the same team should count only 75% against the  cap if they sign with the same team
This way it gives the teams incentives to keep and grow their own talent and gives the fans continuity

Agree on your first point. Basically having Larry Bird rights in the NFL.

Veterans do get a discount against the cap. Not sure how it works. It may be only when they pay vet minimum it counts less against the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dadonkadonk said:

Agree on your first point. Basically having Larry Bird rights in the NFL.

Veterans do get a discount against the cap. Not sure how it works. It may be only when they pay vet minimum it counts less against the cap.

I'm specifically talking about star (or close to star status) players who expect bigger salaries and then leave their teams for bigger paychecks (which is fine, they should get whatever they are worth) but for us fans - the home team should get some kind of cap "discount" for making an effort and keeping them

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Buftex said:

Yes, I changed my comment to 2015, for the reasons you mention.  Personally, I think Whaley was a good drafter. I thnk, had Marrone not left when he did, the "drought" would have ended a few years earlier.  Rex Ryan was the de-facto GM...

 

If Whaley gets a second chance with a head coach he is gets to pick or is very close with I wouldn't be surprised if he is moderately successful to really good. His drafts were good minus 16 which like you said was Ryan, he could find guys in FA for next to nothing that worked well, and he got some real steals trading wise. His two big problems were contracts and coexisting with the coach if the coach played a player that wasn't Whaley's guy. I think those two things are fixable.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillsIsrael said:

I think the NFL should address the issue also from a fans perspective - the fans want to cheer for the players that they know - cheering for a player one year and then booing him the next is not good for retaining fans
They should give cap incentives to keep your own players - like after the first contract players that were drafter by a team count only  90% against the cap.
Players (like KW for example) who played for over 8 years in the league and the last 5 for the same team should count only 75% against the  cap if they sign with the same team
This way it gives the teams incentives to keep and grow their own talent and gives the fans continuity

That’s, in essence, what happens in the NBA. You get more money with your team than elsewhere. It’s Bird Rights

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, BillsIsrael said:

Not an NBA follower - but I guess the NBA got this one right

It worked for a while and definitely works while the guys are young (because the gap is enormous between the current team and the league). The veteran guys have made so much money later in their careers that they move some and take less money. They chase championships in a lot of cases. You probably keep a star though for his first 8-10 seasons no problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Dopey said:

New coaching staff and gm taking over for the rex ryan cluster fudge. No surprise there. Trust the process.

When you change coaches every two years, it's a sure thing personnel is going to get flipped.   

 

I think McBeane will get ar teast four years in Buffalo, and you'll see this stat change dramatically.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...