Jump to content

OT--- How the hell is Roger Craig not in the HOF?


Big Turk

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Terrell Davis ABSOLUTELY belongs in the HOF, and it's actually a slam dunk. He had 1200 yards rushing and 12 TDs in 8 playoff games, which is staggering. Prorated, his postseason numbers amount to 2,400 rushing yards and 24 TDs over a 16 game season - and this is against the best competition in the league. Plus he was a SB MVP (deservingly so too).

 

Unlike baseball, postseason performance actually matters in football. 

Lydell Mitchell too. He was the first to really occupy the sort of role that Craig filled for a sustained period of time. 

Postseason. It matters. And it should. 

 

Did you really have to throw a shot at baseball in there?  Really?  ;)

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Absolutely on Lenny Moore. Nice point! I was born in 1967 so I never saw him play, but as a kid I remember watching Lydell Mitchell make catch after catch from Bert Jones (one of the better QBs I ever watched). 

 

That Colt mid 70's offense was really good under none other than Ted Marchibroda with Jones, Mitchell, and Carr.  They used to kill the Bills.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

HOVG is where he belongs.

 

I agree entirely.  I remember watching him play and listening to people speculate about him getting into the HOF.   But I never saw him as a HOFer.  

 

He was a high profile player because he played on good teams with good coaches who got into the playoffs.  And he was indeed a very good player.  But he wasn't great IMHO.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Conversely ...

 

How the hell is Terrell Davis IN the Hall of Fame?

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaviTe00.htm

 

For comparison, here are Craig's stats:

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CraiRo00.htm

 

 

My big knock on Terrell Davis is that he was only good for 3 years.  He was really really good for 3 years, but again - 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No question that Craig deserves to be in, considering other players that are in. A terrific all around player for a decade, stats to prove it, prolific in both the run and pass game, stats to prove it, prolific in the post season in both the run and pass game, stats to prove it, and a winner. It's a no brainer, regardless of the players he played with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Lurker said:

Just his playoff rushing totals make a good case for his HOF chances, let alone his other contributions...

 

NFL Rushing Yards Career Playoffs Leaders

+ indicates Hall of Famer

Rank Player Yds Years Tm
1 Emmitt Smith+ 1,586 1990-2004 dal
2 Franco Harris+ 1,556 1972-1984 pit
3 Thurman Thomas+ 1,442 1988-2000 buf
4 Tony Dorsett+ 1,383 1977-1988 dal
5 Marcus Allen+ 1,347 1982-1997 2TM
6 Terrell Davis+ 1,140 1995-2001 den
7 John Riggins+ 996 1971-1985 was
8 Marshawn Lynch 937 2007-2017 sea
9 Larry Csonka+ 891 1968-1979 mia
10 Chuck Foreman 860 1973-1980 min
11 Edgerrin James 852 1999-2009 2TM
12 Roger Craig 841 1983-1993 2TM
13 Earnest Byner 839 1984-1997 2TM
14 Curtis Martin+ 795 1995-2005 2TM
15 Eddie George 776 1996-2004 oti
16 Ray Rice 750 2008-2013 rav
17 Eric Dickerson+ 724 1983-1993 2TM
18 Dorsey Levens 702 1994-2004 2TM
19 Lawrence McCutcheon 687 1972-1981 ram
20 Jerome Bettis+ 674 1993-2005 pit

 

Who on earth is chuck foreman? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kelly the Dog said:

No question that Craig deserves to be in, considering other players that are in. A terrific all around player for a decade, stats to prove it, prolific in both the run and pass game, stats to prove it, prolific in the post season in both the run and pass game, stats to prove it, and a winner. It's a no brainer, regardless of the players he played with. 

Ricky Watters' numbers are significantly more impressive than Craig's. I don't really have a dog in this fight, but if you're a RB, I think voters feel you need to get to 10,000 yards or have either some out-of-this-world numbers in the postseason like Terrell Davis or a career cut short by injury after a meteoric few years (Gale Sayers). For regular good players, it's kinda like sluggers and 500 homers (Fred McGriff has 493 and isn't in). I'm not saying that's right, but it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Ricky Watters' numbers are significantly more impressive than Craig's. I don't really have a dog in this fight, but if you're a RB, I think voters feel you need to get to 10,000 yards or have either some out-of-this-world numbers in the postseason like Terrell Davis or a career cut short by injury after a meteoric few years (Gale Sayers). For regular good players, it's kinda like sluggers and 500 homers (Fred McGriff has 493 and isn't in). I'm not saying that's right, but it is what it is.

If it is what it is it's stupid. It's not Craig's fault that the best offensive mind in the history of the game thought it was a good idea a lot of the time to throw a swing pass to him, and guys like him, instead of a pitchout. He was enormously productive from that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...