Jump to content

44 games with Tyrod at QB - % breakdown


Recommended Posts

44 total games as the Bills QB:

 

INTs

Games with 3 INT: 1 - 2.2%

Games with 2 INT: 0 - 0.0%

Games with 1 INT: 13 - 29.5%

Games with 0 INT: 30 - 68.1%

 

Passing Yards

43 games under 300 - 97.7%

38 games under 280 - 86.3%

30 games under 230 - 68.1%

23 games under 200 - 52.2%

16 games under 180 - 36.3%

7 games under 130 - 15.9%

 

Passing TDs

Games with 3 passing TDs: 6 - 13.6%

Games with 2 passing TDs: 7 - 15.9%

Games with 1 passing TD: 19 - 43.1%

Games with 0 passing TD: 12 - 27.2%

 

31 games with 1 or 0 passing TDs - 70.4%

38 games with 2 or fewer passing TDs - 86.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth hurts but the COT will still point to everyone else's fault while pushing for him to stay another season.

 

It is sad when other teams laugh at the Bills stating they made him be a QB.

 

I would like to see our OC be able to have all the QBs run the same scheme not two on one scheme and Tyrod on his short bus scheme. Can not have any unity on offense when not on the same page.

Edited by xRUSHx
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was Dennison's play-calling.

It was Roman's system.

He didn't have any receivers.

His o-line didn't block for him.

He was playing hurt.

He's held to a higher standard because he's black.

 

Did I miss any?

 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gugny said:

It was Dennison's play-calling.

It was Roman's system.

He didn't have any receivers.

His o-line didn't block for him.

He was playing hurt.

He's held to a higher standard because he's black.

 

Did I miss any?

 

He needs shorter o-line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gugny said:

It was Dennison's play-calling.

It was Roman's system.

He didn't have any receivers.

His o-line didn't block for him.

He was playing hurt.

He's held to a higher standard because he's black.

 

Did I miss any?

 

 

I get what you are saying - every excuse under the sun for Tyrod.  But you're missing the point that Dennison's system was not a fit for Tyrod (which should have been seen in camp), yet it was stubbornly forced on him anyway.  The results were putrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I get what you are saying - every excuse under the sun for Tyrod.  But you're missing the point that Dennison's system was not a fit for Tyrod (which should have been seen in camp), yet it was stubbornly forced on him anyway.  The results were putrid.

 

The stats above are for 44 games not 15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gugny said:

It was Dennison's play-calling.

It was Roman's system.

He didn't have any receivers.

His o-line didn't block for him.

He was playing hurt.

He's held to a higher standard because he's black.

 

Did I miss any?

 

If it wasn't for Tyrod McCoy wouldn't be as productive as a back.

 

He should still be considered a rookie because he has only been a starter a few seasons.

 

But he was so good in 2015

 

 

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I get what you are saying - every excuse under the sun for Tyrod.  But you're missing the point that Dennison's system was not a fit for Tyrod (which should have been seen in camp), yet it was stubbornly forced on him anyway.  The results were putrid.

 

Is that Dennison's fault? You make it sound like there's some magical offensive scheme with Tyrod where all of the sudden he's unstoppable.  We called plenty of roll-out style pass plays in the second half of the season.  We called several designed QB runs.  What do you want Dennison to do exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I get what you are saying - every excuse under the sun for Tyrod.  But you're missing the point that Dennison's system was not a fit for Tyrod (which should have been seen in camp), yet it was stubbornly forced on him anyway.  The results were putrid.

 

That was part of the process.  We learned that it's a good system because receivers were open all day long every week and the run game was solid.

 

If a company makes a bad hire and an employee isn't a good fit, the company doesn't change the way they do things.  They get rid of the employee who's not a good fit.

Edited by Gugny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mrbojanglezs said:

 

The stats above are for 44 games not 15

 

I understand that, but you can't tell me that Tyrod was worse in 2015 and 2016.  You also can't deny that the offense in general this season was much worse than the past two seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Roman's offense perfect, no? Was Lynn's offense perfect, no? Was Dennison's offense perfect, no?

 

Either way there were open receivers that he has missed in every offense. His first 2 years, he wouldn't throw to the middle of the field, this year he wouldn't throw to the outside. His vision is too limited to be a franchise QB. Tyrod is a nice guy, hard worker, team leader, etc. but he is not clutch whatsoever and is not going to take us to where we need to be. It's time to move on, for better or worse, i just don't get how anyone can defend Tyrod or think we should come back for year 4. 

Edited by uticaclub
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I understand that, but you can't tell me that Tyrod was worse in 2015 and 2016.  You also can't deny that the offense in general this season was much worse than the past two seasons.

 

He was worse this year but the overall theme was always the same with him. If you look at threads before the 2017 season you will see

 

  • Can't throw over the middle
  • Doesn't fit it in small windows
  • Not an anticipation thrower
  • Reads half the field
  • Runs/bails on pocket too quick

 

The one thing that really dropped off for Taylor this year was his long ball. He used to be terrible with over the middle 15 yard throws but really good with long bombs, maybe losing Sammy and Goodwin contributed to that but his long ball game was awful this year.

 

You make a big case that Dennison's offense was not a fit, what offense is a fit for Tyrod the wishbone? Read Option Runs? 


Fact of the matter is regardless of the scheme, he struggled as a passer.

Edited by Mrbojanglezs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I understand that, but you can't tell me that Tyrod was worse in 2015 and 2016.  You also can't deny that the offense in general this season was much worse than the past two seasons.

 

He wasn't worse in 2015 and 2016.  He's been painfully consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I understand that, but you can't tell me that Tyrod was worse in 2015 and 2016.  You also can't deny that the offense in general this season was much worse than the past two seasons.

Miracle seasons happen from time to time, look at MCastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I understand that, but you can't tell me that Tyrod was worse in 2015 and 2016.  You also can't deny that the offense in general this season was much worse than the past two seasons.

I'm with you on this one.

 

While I think TT is limited and they need to move on from him, I think Dennison is more to blame than him., and should be gone as well.

 

Every single category on offence is way down from the past two years. The main difference? Change at offensive coordinator. Coincidence? Nope

 

Edited by billsfan11
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...