Mat68 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 For being here for a few days i think Wenning is tbe third qb. Yates has been terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 No 3rd QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Moulds on my A** Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Keep Logan Thomas, break glass in case of emergency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 No 3rd QB As a team as QB starved as us, why wouldn't we want to keep an extra guy around to try to develop or whatever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 As a team as QB starved as us, why wouldn't we want to keep an extra guy around to try to develop or whatever? If Peterman has won the No 2 job. No reason to keep a 3rd QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclynrea21 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 no after I seen every game Yates is out. but in my opinion Pederson should start week one, this offence moves a LOT better with him, then TT then the new guy.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 no after I seen every game Yates is out. but in my opinion Pederson should start week one, this offence moves a LOT better with him, then TT then the new guy.. The Eagles head coach has retired from the NFL. Doesn't matter anyway because Tyrod's starting if he's recovered from the concussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Keep Logan Thomas, break glass in case of emergency. That will let them cut Yates and put Wenning on PS. That extra spot for WR with potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Angel Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 The new guy looked better against the Lions then Yates ever has in a bills uniform Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) It was preseason in a meaningless game buy I think if the Bills keep a 3rd QB we have a Weiner. Wenning! Edited September 1, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 That will let them cut Yates and put Wenning on PS. That extra spot for WR with potential. We could very well see this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 I see no reason for a 3rd QB on active roster...if you need a 3rd QB to play you're in trouble already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Usually the reason for 3rd QB ion most rosters these days is to prevent poaching of QB you are developing. Yates does not qualify as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 I see no reason for a 3rd QB on active roster...if you need a 3rd QB to play you're in trouble already Nor do I. If they do please not Yates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROONDOGG55 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 As things have played out on the QB front so far it looks as though Peterman has passed Yates as the number two do you think the Bills should stick with Yates as the number 3? Reasons to "stay the course": He's a young veteran who knows his role and can help Peterman learn the game. He's cheap He wouldn't be the worst QB in the league if pressed into service (but I'm not impressed with his track record and he hasn't instilled a great deal of confidence based on his performance as a Bill so far) Reasons to change: Good opportunity to bring in someone with a higher ceiling when the cuts come down or even a younger vet on the street (True they could be a disaster if pressed into service but if we aren't making the playoffs or winning a super bowl with Yates either) Look for a more successful back-up after Saturday I am not a big fan of Yates so I'd make a change but thought I would throw it out there for discussion. We need depth in other areas. No other team will sign him, so we're better off to cut him now, and use his roster spot to carry an extra WR or DB. If we need to later, we can always sign him or Wenning of the street again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 EDIT: this seems to be what they're up to: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/08/30/cutting-haden-could-be-the-final-precursor-to-cutting-osweiler/ Florio neglects to include replacement cost players in his calculations. Yeah it is not a lot of money but neither is someone picking up Oz for veteran minimum which saves Cleveland money. Florio does his articles the same way Buffalo News writers do - write conclusion first and then look for facts to back conclusion ignoring any facts which do not fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) Anybody else...Yates has looked downright terrible...doubly so since he was supposed to have a leg up becaaue he was familiar with the system and is a vet Don't really need a 3rd QB...I mean our chances of winning a game if they have to play is almost non existent anyway, use the roster spot on a player that can contribute Edited September 1, 2017 by matter2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Anybody else...Yates has looked downright terrible...doubly so since he was supposed to have a leg up becaaue he was familiar with the system and is a vet Don't really need a 3rd QB...I mean our chances of winning a game if they have to play is almost non existent anyway, use the roster spot on a player that can contribute This is so overrated....I remember the Bills signed Guy Frazier in '85 because he knew the system. He was awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manther Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Yates being the safe choice is like banging a hooker without a condom. Bare back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overdue Bill Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) With the number of injuries in this league, I think that you have to have a 3rd QB on your roster. Teams are teeing off on QBs and Tyrod is not the most durable guy around. Even if you pick up a green "developmental" player and park him on the practice squad you have to have some insurance in this league. Edited September 1, 2017 by Overdue Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.7c40145b679a5d0fc95be2194c7e2328.png)
Recommended Posts