Jump to content

8-14: Bills' GM Brandon Beane on WGR


Recommended Posts

 

If Taylor was as bad as you proclaim, the new staff and Beane would've jettisoned Taylor months ago. As far as wasting Sammy, don't you think it's hard to target a WR that's standing on the sidelines for half the season?

Don't know how one can presume Watkins is not healthy now. That particular foot injury often takes two years to fully heal.

Sammy played through pain. He's not soft. As for Taylor, he remains the best available option. Building up draft resources could plausibly be an indication Snake Opie and Mr. Bean don't think highly of him long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

If Taylor was as bad as you proclaim, the new staff and Beane would've jettisoned Taylor months ago. As far as wasting Sammy, don't you think it's hard to target a WR that's standing on the sidelines for half the season?

He has a career high 69 catches. That's a joke. He should approach closer to twice that number. He's open virtually every play because there isn't a DB alive who can cover him but the Bills never have the QB who can throw it on time and play pitch n catch all day long

 

And there were plenty of open receivers last season not named Watkins who just did not get the ball because the QB can't see the field and distribute the rock consistently.

 

I don't want to argue with y'all about Tyrod endlessly. If You think he's good then good for you, I'm just stating my perspective

Edited by 2018 Our Year For Sure
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know how one can presume Watkins is not healthy now. That particular foot injury often takes two years to fully heal.

Sammy played through pain. He's not soft. As for Taylor, he remains the best available option. Building up draft resources could plausibly be an indication Snake Opie and Mr. Bean don't think highly of him long term.

 

But as you described him, he's God awful. Why not get rid of him for something and rebuild?

 

As far as McD and Beane not being sold on him, they have no reason to be completely sold on him at this point. But I will say they see enough potential there to see how this season goes....far from being the terrible QB you make him out to be.

He has a career high 69 catches. That's a joke. He should approach closer to twice that number. He's open virtually every play because there isn't a DB alive who can cover him but the Bills never have the QB who can throw it on time and play pitch n catch all day long

 

And there were plenty of open receivers last season not named Watkins who just did not get the ball because the QB can't see the field and distribute the rock consistently.

 

I don't want to argue with y'all about Tyrod endlessly. If You think he's good then good for you, I'm just stating my perspective

 

So we had WR's running around uncovered, a brick wall for an Oline and Taylor simply couldn't hit anybody? Come on man....when you're so over the top and critical in your "perspective", you instantly lose credibility. It's this kind of one-sided, melodramatic reaction that sparks the never ending squabbles about certain players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But as you described him, he's God awful. Why not get rid of him for something and rebuild?

 

As far as McD and Beane not being sold on him, they have no reason to be completely sold on him at this point. But I will say they see enough potential there to see how this season goes....far from being the terrible QB you make him out to be.

 

I have never said Taylor was awful. I don't think he's a franchise qb and I think you need one for long term success.

I'd be happy for Taylor to wildly exceed my expectations. I don't think getting rid of Sammy helps him do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But as you described him, he's God awful. Why not get rid of him for something and rebuild?

 

As far as McD and Beane not being sold on him, they have no reason to be completely sold on him at this point. But I will say they see enough potential there to see how this season goes....far from being the terrible QB you make him out to be.

 

 

So we had WR's running around uncovered, a brick wall for an Oline and Taylor simply couldn't hit anybody? Come on man....when you're so over the top and critical in your "perspective", you instantly lose credibility. It's this kind of one-sided, melodramatic reaction that sparks the never ending squabbles about certain players.

Wut? Have a nice day
Link to comment
Share on other sites

" The draft is the most affordable way to pay very good players. Our job is to pay attention where we are financially". I'm a major supporter of the trades, but even I hate that quote. Fiscal responsible is great. There is obviously a major need to manage the salary cap correctly. Those facts don't negate the fact that money ball doesn't win championships. How many titles did Billy Beane with the MLB A's who was the originator of that term win? The answer is zero. Sometimes you have to pay your best players. Every team in the league has to do so. So what's the plan? Draft great players only to let them walk? That's not how you build a winner. I understood the trade because the new regime wants to start with a clean slate. They want a fresh start with an a surplus of draft picks. What a don't understand is that comment. I hope that is not our philosophy going forward. Where they dominate is by having Brady on the roster imo. It's not college football. You can't let your best players walk every four years. Teams have to pay the players who cost the most. They are the guys who are most crucial to a teams success. It's actually the lower paid role players that need to be replaced every season. Beane talks like he's unwilling to pay anyone. That would be a terrible strategy.

"... So youre looking at a guy whos walking into his free agent year," Beane said. "I mentioned where our cap situation is at, you just dont know how youre going to be able to afford him. You dont know exactly what his market is going to be but you see where some of the guys are being paid now, so that had to be a factor in this decision, Beane said.

 

 

I couldn't find his initial quote on the Bills salary cap situation. But it sounds like that was a big factor. They are trying to get the Bills cap back in order, which is something that needed to be done. They were a mediocre 7 win team that was in rough cap shape with a ton of free agents to sign entering this offseason. That situation has gotten better after some tough cuts and the Sammy trade.

 

I didn't at all get that he wasn't willing to pay anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me translate.

"If Sammy had a bad year we weren't going to sign him. If Sammy had a great year we weren't going to pay him. Rookies are cheaper so we are going to trade players or let them walk and just have constant turn over."

"EJ Gaines is short, but if you kind of squint he looks taller."

So true. Just what I had feared and then watched it become reality on Friday. Ughhhhhhhhhhh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does moving Watkins and Darby for Matthews and Gaines improve depth for 2017?

It's not about improving depth for 2017. It's about 2018, 2019 and beyond.

 

Theyre stockpiling draft picks to build this team. They hired the best scouting/personnel staff that they possibly could and plan to build through the draft. It's something the Bills haven't done in a long time. I'm willing to give it a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me translate.

 

"If Sammy had a bad year we weren't going to sign him. If Sammy had a great year we weren't going to pay him. Rookies are cheaper so we are going to trade players or let them walk and just have constant turn over."

 

"EJ Gaines is short, but if you kind of squint he looks taller."

 

 

:lol:

 

Yep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh?

They had 13 million in cap before the Bolden deal and have over 30 million next year.

 

If that's their plan it will be short lived.

They won't make it past year 3 because they won't be winning.

They had like $19M in cap space entering this offseason with something like 26 players to sign. Like I said, it's in better shape now after some tough cuts,

 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/cap/

 

Spotrac has the Bills at $6M in cap space this year and $26M in cap space next year. Has they kept Sammy and tagged or,paid him, that likely takes up at minimum $15M of that $26M in cap space. So that leaves $11M or less to make other improvements to the team.

Edited by BillsFan4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had something like $19M in cap space entering the offseason with what, 26 players to sign? Like I said it's better now that they made some tough cuts. http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/cap/

Spotrac has the Bills at $6M in cap space this year and $26M in cap space next year. Has they kept Sammy and tagged or,paid him, that likely takes up at minimum $15M of that $26M in cap space. So that leaves $11M or less to make other improvements to the team.

There are agin vets that could be released as they won't be here by the time the team is ready to win.They can also restructure deals. If Sammy produced they could work out a more cap friendly deal ( though the 5 Th year option is eminently reasonable). They could move on from Eric Wood. You are assuming everything is static which it isn't . Plenty of cap room on this team bereft of Offensive stars and talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very simple 8/14/17 is anyone willing to pay watkins 60 plus million and make him the vocal point of our offense for the next 5 years?

 

I think you mean "focal point".......like when you focus a lens onto a specific object in the field of view with binoculars or a telescope.

 

That's very appropriate IMO........because the Bills literally have nothing else to spend their money on so he was basically the focal point of their spending for the next few years.

 

Traded away a #1 pick to get Sammy......used another on EJ.......Cyrus underperformed and got cut.........Kiko got traded.......Woods left in FA........Darby got dealt.......even 2016 second rounder(plus two fourths!) Rebbie Ragruts has one foot in the grave and another on a banana peel.

 

Welp........that's basically all the top picks that were coming up for contract renewals between now and when McDermott and Beane get fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So we had WR's running around uncovered, a brick wall for an Oline and Taylor simply couldn't hit anybody? Come on man....when you're so over the top and critical in your "perspective", you instantly lose credibility. It's this kind of one-sided, melodramatic reaction that sparks the never ending squabbles about certain players.

 

You may want to review the all-22 from last season. It's widely known that Bills receivers were running open in the secondary in practically every game. Right from the first or second play of the opener actually, you won't have to watch for long to see an example. And TT either didn't see them, didn't look at them , or just wouldn't throw it on time. It's there, check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me translate.

 

"If Sammy had a bad year we weren't going to sign him. If Sammy had a great year we weren't going to pay him. Rookies are cheaper so we are going to trade players or let them walk and just have constant turn over."

 

"EJ Gaines is short, but if you kind of squint he looks taller."

People def hear what they want to hear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you mean "focal point".......like when you focus a lens onto a specific object in the field of view with binoculars or a telescope.

 

That's very appropriate IMO........because the Bills literally have nothing else to spend their money on so he was basically the focal point of their spending for the next few years.

 

Traded away a #1 pick to get Sammy......used another on EJ.......Cyrus underperformed and got cut.........Kiko got traded.......Woods left in FA........Darby got dealt.......even 2016 second rounder(plus two fourths!) Rebbie Ragruts has one foot in the grave and another on a banana peel.

 

Welp........that's basically all the top picks that were coming up for contract renewals between now and when McDermott and Beane get fired.

That's a great point badol. People act like this team has so many stars they don't know who to pay. And a very simple move with the option meant they didn't have to do anything until late in the 2018 season at the earliest.

People def hear what they want to hear

Or they can read between the lines when they're presented with the OBD " spin zone" . Edited by Boatdrinks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me translate.

 

"If Sammy had a bad year we weren't going to sign him. If Sammy had a great year we weren't going to pay him. Rookies are cheaper so we are going to trade players or let them walk and just have constant turn over."

 

"EJ Gaines is short, but if you kind of squint he looks taller."

You mean follow the patriot model? Surely that will never work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beane actually said today in the last minute of his GR interview that momentum for the trades picked up a couple days before the game - "and through the game" - which easily could mean that the Rams decided after seeing him that they were pulling the trigger. That is an unknown, of course. He could have been saying that in a more general sense, but it sounded to me as if he said he was talking to them during the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...