CuddyDark Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 The only reason you opt for so many possession receivers is you have a starting QB with a quick release but mediocre arm. Doesn't sound like Tyrod. Also heard today Bills tried to trade Tyrod for Jalen Ramsey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 The only reason you opt for so many possession receivers is you have a starting QB with a quick release but mediocre arm. Doesn't sound like Tyrod. Also heard today Bills tried to trade Tyrod for Jalen Ramsey. Wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 McBeane is bringing back the Jauron days. Character and Trent dinking and dunking, bore ball. Sadly, I defend them the first time around. I'm not going to take it again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellyToughII Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I would do the TT for Ramsey trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 The only reason you opt for so many possession receivers is you have a starting QB with a quick release but mediocre arm. Doesn't sound like Tyrod. Also heard today Bills tried to trade Tyrod for Jalen Ramsey. From where? That would be awesome. Then again, Ramsey would walk in 4 years due to "signability." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I would do the TT for Ramsey trade In a second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellyToughII Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 McBeane is bringing back the Jauron days. Character and Trent dinking and dunking, bore ball. Sadly, I defend them the first time around. I'm not going to take it again! Dinking and Dunking? I am pretty sure Rogers in GB doesn't dink and dunk in the WCO, I could be wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Dinking and Dunking? I am pretty sure Rogers in GB doesn't dink and dunk in the WCO, I could be wrong And there it is. Peterman is the next Rodgers!!! In a second Of course but we'd have to throw in a 1st too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Dinking and Dunking? I am pretty sure Rogers in GB doesn't dink and dunk in the WCO, I could be wrong The Bills don't exactly have Aaron Rodgers at QB. It's undeniable the Bills offensive potential is less exciting than it was a few days ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I've thought that if they traded TT it would be a similar return to the Watkins trade. A part-time player and a 2. Denver seems like the best fit imo but I love the idea of Ramsey. It helps short-term with the tank and you may have a great secondary long-term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 McBeane is bringing back the Jauron days. Character and Trent dinking and dunking, bore ball. Sadly, I defend them the first time around. I'm not going to take it again! ....Jauron days?.....are you effing serious?.....that azzclown didn't even know there was an offensive side to the football....his pressers resembled Grandma's wake.......and now he's folding towels in the Lingerie League......this could be a NEW LOW.....Jesus............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 The only reason you opt for so many possession receivers is you have a starting QB with a quick release but mediocre arm. Doesn't sound like Tyrod. Also heard today Bills tried to trade Tyrod for Jalen Ramsey. Where did you hear this? I'd do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purple haze Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I've thought that if they traded TT it would be a similar return to the Watkins trade. A part-time player and a 2. Denver seems like the best fit imo but I love the idea of Ramsey. It helps short-term with the tank and you may have a great secondary long-term. This was a Facebook concoction. Nothing to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 ....Jauron days?.....are you effing serious?.....that azzclown didn't even know there was an offensive side to the football....his pressers resembled Grandma's wake.......and now he's folding towels in the Lingerie League......this could be a NEW LOW.....Jesus............. TBG is pretty boring himself. He is a defensive coach. He is going to be a lot more conservative than you think. Our receiving core lost our homerun threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 This was a Facebook concoction. Nothing to see here.Oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Where did you hear this? I'd do it I'm not discrediting the OP, but I find this hard to believe unless Buffalo was going to throw in a bunch of picks. Ramsey is a young elite CB. Tyrod is....well, a mediocre QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I've thought that if they traded TT it would be a similar return to the Watkins trade. A part-time player and a 2. Denver seems like the best fit imo but I love the idea of Ramsey. It helps short-term with the tank and you may have a great secondary long-term. I'd do that trade too. Ramsey would be an amazing get though and I'd prefer that if it was straight up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellyToughII Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 The Bills don't exactly have Aaron Rodgers at QB. It's undeniable the Bills offensive potential is less exciting than it was a few days ago. Bull crap. Catch the damn ball and run with it. Jerry Rice didn't do deep a ton, RAC is what its about. There will be times to go deep. Personally I don't give a damn about "exciting" I give a damn about winning. If its "boring" but we win, who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I'd do that trade too. Ramsey would be an amazing get though and I'd prefer that if it was straight upI could see it. Doug wants to run every play, they are close to winning and Bortles stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellyToughII Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 (edited) TBG is pretty boring himself. He is a defensive coach. He is going to be a lot more conservative than you think. Our receiving core lost our homerun threat. Enough of this BS. How many playoffs games won with our Home run threat? None. Zero. One WR does NOT make the difference and wouldn't this year period. BTW Jordy Nelson runs a 4.51. Check out his stats in this same system. And before you say "well he has Rogers" WTF do you think beane and company are trying to do? Get an Arron Rogers next year so we can FINALLY address THE main position that matters on an NFL Team. Edited August 13, 2017 by KellyToughII Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts