H2o Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/855459059226595334 You have a generational talent in Garrett (jmo) whom the coaches are all in on and the meddling owner is going to step in to make them take Trubisky. Crazy imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) Jimmy Haslam isn't James Dolan bad but he's in the bottom 5 owners in sports IMO. Edited April 21, 2017 by Kirby Jackson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-N Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodrigo Borgia Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 You have no idea how many fans wish that the Bills were in the same positions as the Browns are in right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-NWhy brother with the smokescreen when you have the 1st pick? They should draft Garrett (and I think that they will). I'm thinking that they may trade back up to 5 (using picks 12 and 52) to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted April 21, 2017 Author Share Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-N This is the #1 pick. From everything I have read they have not even considered trading out. Who wants to move up that bad for Trubisky anyway that they could possibly be putting pressure on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolishDave Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Why brother with the smokescreen when you have the 1st pick? They should draft Garrett (and I think that they will). I'm thinking that they may trade back up to 5 (using picks 12 and 52) to get him. Exactly what I was thinking. Who are you trying to fool? You can pick anybody and announce it. Doesn't change anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KollegeStudnet Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Browns are gonna Browns. Garrett will go number one. Wouldn't be surprised if they get Garrett and trade up to snag Trubisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CEN-CAL17 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 I'll go on record stating I don't think Myles Garrett will live up to his #1 overall status. It's just something about his fluidity I don't like.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) This is the #1 pick. From everything I have read they have not even considered trading out. Who wants to move up that bad for Trubisky anyway that they could possibly be putting pressure on? Perhaps its somehow tied to what they do with their 12th pick. Sashi and company want to stay at 12 and hope Mitch is there, owner wants them to move up so Jesters and Bills don't grab him. They could be hedging their bets for someone to call them requesting a trade at 12 in the event Mitch goes early. They should be tarred and feathered if they pass on Garrett. Edited April 21, 2017 by TheElectricCompany Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 How about this: Trade the no 1 pick to NE for Garappolo and Malcolm Butler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Haslam is scum of the earth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) How about this: Trade the no 1 pick to NE for Garappolo and Malcolm Butler?according to Schefter the pats are not trading Jimmy under any circumstances. They ask him every week on his radio spot here because Browns really wanted him and he said on a stack of bibles that his pats source is accurate and they will not be trading him. Makes me think Brady is close to hanging it up no matter how many avocados and kale salads he eats every day. Edited April 21, 2017 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 How about this: Trade the no 1 pick to NE for Garappolo and Malcolm Butler?That's an interesting thought!! They can turn around and take someone like Derek Barnett at 12, Dalvin Cook at 33 and Obi Melifonwu at 52. That would be a nice start to the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 That's an interesting thought!! They can turn around and take someone like Derek Barnett at 12, Dalvin Cook at 33 and Obi Melifonwu at 52. That would be a nice start to the draft.And I think the Pats would it, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKellyTryouts Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 (edited) I surprised no one has said it yet so allow me: LaCanfora If this were a bills targeted headline we'd be all over that by now. "hearing" "rumblings" conjecture etc... Edited April 21, 2017 by JimKellyTryouts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 It's not the first time the Browns got tricky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 S-M-O-K-E-S-C-R-E-E-N they have the first pick. Who are they trying to fool? They should pick Garrett, then make a trade with SF for the 2nd pick and pick Trubisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoTom Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Why brother with the smokescreen when you have the 1st pick? They should draft Garrett (and I think that they will). I'm thinking that they may trade back up to 5 (using picks 12 and 52) to get him. Exactly what I was thinking. Who are you trying to fool? You can pick anybody and announce it. Doesn't change anything. Why announce the pick before you have to? That would give the other 31 teams more time to think about who they'll pick, knowing in advance one guy who's off the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fridge Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Isn't this a La Confora post? Does he have any credibility left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts