WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Continuing the "how do we fill out the WR group" I have been mulling on this idea. The Saint said no to the 32nd overall but maybe more receptive to the 10th. I am NOT advocating for a straight swap, but maybe we get a mid rounder back. Normally I wouldn't suggest such a thing. But today the WR market has gotten very small very expensive for anyone who isn't a camp body. Cooks is still on a rookie deal. He's a more proven commodity. It would definitely give us a #2 WR. The tradeoff is that we control him for less time. I thought I would throw it out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob16151 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 For a pair of seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Cooks hates the NO system that he's putting up 1100 yard seasons and 7 TD's a year. Doubt the Bills have the system for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K-GunJimKelly12 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 The problem with that is you are going to be trying to re-sign both Cooks and Watkins in the same season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Is he a FB? How is his blocking? Whats his catch radius? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest K-GunJimKelly12 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Is he a FB? How is his blocking? Whats his catch radius? This is pretty funny lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rigotz Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 (edited) Hi, this is my first post since getting kicked off the old BBMB.No, I would not trade for him.Why would we spend 3 total first round picks on a pair of wide receivers when we never throw the ball ...and then not have the money to re-sign either?The end. Thank you, goodnight. Edited March 8, 2017 by Rigotz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 Hi, this is my first post since getting kicked off the old BBMB. No, I would not trade for him. The Saints wouldn't accept a first round pick from Patriots for him. The end. Ok, quality insight. Any particular reason why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice2145 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 No, he is overrated and disappears for games at a time. Without Drew B he is not all that special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 LOL like we have a QB who can accurately throw a ball that isn't a 50-yard bomb and can use the center of the field. Out routes, dumps offs and bombs is all we have...we might as well just run the 'Veer' next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 LOL like we have a QB who can accurately throw a ball that isn't a 50-yard bomb and can use the center of the field. Out routes, dumps offs and bombs is all we have...we might as well just run the 'Veer' next season Student Body left Student Body right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Hi, this is my first post since getting kicked off the old BBMB. No, I would not trade for him. Why would we spend 3 total first round picks on a pair of wide receivers when we never throw the ball ...and then not have the money to re-sign either? The end. Thank you, goodnight. Hey, you BBMB refugees should all make sure to get an avatar. It will make you more easily recognizable. Welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 He is worth a high draft pick. Young, dynamic, explosive playmaker You can't coach speed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 No way i would trade the 10th pick for Cooks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Hell no. Why pay a premium for him when we can get a decent WR in the draft for rookie money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Hell no. Why pay a premium for him when we can get a decent WR in the draft for rookie money? Exactly. Plus I believe Cooks is a free agent soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheElectricCompany Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 (edited) Hell no. Why pay a premium for him when we can get a decent WR in the draft for rookie money? Cooks is a proven commodity and is knocking at the elite door. Proven production is worth far more than potential. If he was 28, no way, but he'll be 24 this season. Titans turned down the 18th selection for him. I'm not sure the 10th will get it done. Edited March 8, 2017 by TheElectricCompany Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'd rather draft Davis or Williams. Preferably Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Ok, quality insight. Any particular reason why not? Yes. He is a drama queen. He is 4 years older than a rookie WR. And he is going to be a free agent soon. It doesn't make sense on a lot of levels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KollegeStudnet Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts