Jump to content

Super Bowl half time acts have to pay the NFL to play


17 Josh Allen

Recommended Posts

Can you believe the the gull of this bunch

Of billionaire money grabbers.

How can this NFL be a non for profit orginaztion.

I'm talking about the league offices.

Not only do they want bands that want to preform

At the superbowl half time show to pay the NFL to appear on the halftime show. They also want

To grab some of the bands or performers post

Super Bowl performance proceeds from there post tour revenue. It's time for congress to reign this group in

 

Just think about it, they black out games in stadiums paid by tax payers, then they pay the commissioner 44 million dollars a year.

 

 

Link to the article

 

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/nfl-to-coldplay-pay-to-play-the-super-bowl-1408465018?mobile=y

 

Some info from the article

 

The National Football League doesn't usually pay the act that performs at halftime during the Super Bowl. But in a twist this year, the league has asked artists under consideration for the high-profile gig to pay to play, according to people familiar with the matter.

The NFL has narrowed down the list of potential performers for the 2015 Super Bowl to three candidates: Rihanna, Katy Perry, and Coldplay, these people said. While notifying the artists' camps of their candidacy, league representatives also asked at least some of the acts if they would be willing to contribute a portion of their post-Super Bowl tour income to the league, or if they would make some other type of financial contribution, in exchange for the halftime gig.

Edited by billsareback
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Can you believe the the gull of this bunch

Of these billionaire money grabbers.

How can this NFL be a non for profit orginaztion.

I'm talking about the league offices.

Not only do they want bands that want to preform

At the superbowl half time show to pay the NFL to appear on the halftime show. They also want

To grab some of the bands or performers post

Super Bowl performance proceeds from there post tour revenue. It's time for congress to reign this group in

 

Just think about it, they black out games in stadiums paid by tax payers, then they pay the commissioner 44 million dollars a year.

 

 

Link to the article

 

http://m.us.wsj.com/...465018?mobile=y

 

Some info from the article

 

The National Football League doesn't usually pay the act that performs at halftime during the Super Bowl. But in a twist this year, the league has asked artists under consideration for the high-profile gig to pay to play, according to people familiar with the matter.

The NFL has narrowed down the list of potential performers for the 2015 Super Bowl to three candidates: Rihanna, Katy Perry, and Coldplay, these people said. While notifying the artists' camps of their candidacy, league representatives also asked at least some of the acts if they would be willing to contribute a portion of their post-Super Bowl tour income to the league, or if they would make some other type of financial contribution, in exchange for the halftime gig.

 

Your writing is terrible, it makes my head hurt

please take a class so you don't continue to look like an @ss

then maybe people will take your posts seriously

 

I'm not sure what your obsession with the enter key is,

but this isn't funny, it's now just sad.

Please refrain from posting

until you learn how to use proper english and proper use of the enter key

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is until this year bands or performers

Did not have to pay to play. They just donated

There time and band to play. Now not only does the nfl want them to pay to play but they want

Money from there tour dates after they preform

At the halftime show. You don't see a problem with that.

Edited by billsareback
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much is the Super Bowl halftime show worth to performers? Last year, Bruno Mars and the Red Hot Chili Peppers were onstage for about 12 minute. With commercial time valued at $4 million per 30-second slot, that's nearly $100 million worth of publicity for a band.

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/nfl-wants-super-bowl-halftime-acts-to-pony-up-cash-for-the-privilege-of--exposure-180802404.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your writing is terrible, it makes my head hurt

please take a class so you don't continue to look like an @ss

then maybe people will take your posts seriously

 

I'm not sure what your obsession with the enter key is,

but this isn't funny, it's now just sad.

Please refrain from posting

until you learn how to use proper english and proper use of the enter key

it takes a lot of gull to criticize a post like this. the deliberate stream of consciousness style is extremely successful, and grants the reader tremendous insight into the writer's interior world. james joyce would adorn this post several face-with-tears-of-joy emoji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse me the NFL is getting the money

From the Commercials. The performers

Keep more eyes in the TV. In my opinion

This is just plain wrong. To ask for money

From the bands post half time appearance

tour dates is wrong.

They are the NFL, they can do

Whatever they want. If the performers

Don't like it they can play at a different

Venue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy, time for another ignorance-based 'NFL doesn't pay taxes and Roger Goodell makes sooo much money!!!111' rant! Awesome.

 

 

 

it takes a lot of gull to criticize a post like this.

It sure does. Hundreds of them. Enough to cover the whole beach.

Edited by KD in CT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While you all were picking nits with the OP I read the article and the quote above tells me all I need to know and wish I didn't.

 

I didn't need to read the article to know I'll be doing the same thing I do every year at halftime: take a leak, talk to people, get another bowl of chili, serve the wings, get another beer, etc., etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the NFL ... the NFL is driven primarily by greed ... so yeah this makes sense.

The surprising thing is they didn't do this years ago. What this will probably mean is the end of the recent geriatric bands performing, and seeing newer "up & coming" bands/performers where the cost-benefit analysis of performing to a huge audience makes sense.

 

All in all I don't have a problem with it. Simply free enterprise. And it might actually make it worth watching ... you know while you are taking a leak or getting chili or beer ;)

Edited by CodeMonkey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the act playing the halftime show is some popular young upstart-type act, then it may well be in their best interest to pay the NFL for the opportunity to perform. on the other hand, when the Rolling Stones played a few years ago, they probably caused a lot of people to tune-in that might otherwise have not bothered, increasing the value of the commercial time for the network.

 

none of the halftime shows ever have anyone performing that I like, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the OP. This is a little ridiculous. I thought pay for play was only a thing they did in LA for young wanna be rock stars. The NFL can do whatever they want obviously, but the overall greed and price gouging of this organization is steadily rising. I hope Mark Cuban is right. The NFL is acting more and more like the monopoly they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...