Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So much for the "tough on crime president". This is on trump. He wanted this office, now use that office to do something. Got to be a tariff or executive order to do something. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Wolfgang said:

 

 

 

Your selective outrage feels exaggerated...

 

And now you want to blame me for the horrors of the world...

 

Yeah...

 

You are a full blown drama queen...

Selective outrage?  And you are a piece of walking human excrement. Maga white trash. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

Selective outrage?  And you are a piece of walking human excrement. Maga white trash. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

So much for the "tough on crime president". This is on trump. He wanted this office, now use that office to do something. Got to be a tariff or executive order to do something. 

 

Libnuts shooting up innocent people is "on Trump."

 

Deflection & Long.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, JFKjr said:

 

Libnuts shooting up innocent people is "on Trump."

 

Deflection & Long.

Do something about it tough on crime prez. Maga trash loves pedos and kids dying in schools. 

Edited by 4th&long
Posted
11 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

Do something about it tough on crime prez. Maga trash loves pedos and kids dying in schools. 

Easy champ, save some of that drool for tomorrow. The keyboard can only take so much.

Posted

The only ideology these monsters have is hate with mental illness and access to guns. Thank God we have our 2nd Amendment rights. It has to be this way and nothing will change forever and ever…

Posted
3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

This makes no sense. Not theoretically, and not empirically.

So under what law would you have denied him his 2nd Amendment rights?

 

Empirically some liberals are very pro murder of unborn children, They are pro release of murderers into the public, cheer violence ala Cincinnati and they cheer murderers like Luigi. The only comparable bad of my side is being pro death penalty for heinous criminals, which to compare the killing of a horrible person and an innocent person is insane. 

Posted
4 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I agree. But that crosses one of the lines in the sand of the gun nut lobby: preventing someone from buying a gun even though there is no showing of any danger to oneself or others, just a correlation between certain types of mental illness and violent acts.

Mental illness, trans people used to be labeled as mentally ill. This would bar them from owning guns. Since they have such a high rate of suicide it could lower their suicide rate as well. 

Posted
12 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Mental illness, trans people used to be labeled as mentally ill. This would bar them from owning guns. Since they have such a high rate of suicide it could lower their suicide rate as well. 

 

It's still a diagnosable mental illness per the DSM-5. But I don't know if that has ever prevented someone from buying a firearm. 

Posted

Maybe Walz himself triggered this guy, based on the shooter's twitter handle. As we learned during the presidential campaign, Walz DOES know some school shooters personally, he mentioned that. 

 

 

Posted

🎯 to the reply.

 

Mr. Vice President,

 

You already know the answer. The Democratic Party operates as a coordinated bloc, because its members have traded independent judgment for collective discipline.

 

In this case, a transgender youth, animated by hostility toward Christians, Trump supporters, and Jews, murdered children while they prayed. That outcome did not come from nowhere. For years, Democratic rhetoric has coded contempt for these groups, and today, more than half of Democratic voters openly say that violence against President Trump would be justified. This climate has been amplified by torrents of foreign and philanthropic money, openly directed toward fomenting a "color revolution." Even former USAID operatives now declare this as their goal.

 

Now the party faces the result: one of its own has carried out violence in its name. And there will be more.

 

A people grounded in moral clarity would pause, reflect, and correct course. Your colleagues will not. Their overriding loyalty is to the party line, even when it collapses under contradiction. That is why they double down: Gavin Newsom defends child migrants on marijuana farms rather than admit the failure of open borders; Jen Psaki denounces prayer itself rather than concede the limits of gun control.

 

We can learn from this: if they succeed in confiscating firearms, it will not be about safety. It will be about power. They intend to rule.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

Empirically some liberals are very pro murder of unborn children, They are pro release of murderers into the public, cheer violence ala Cincinnati and they cheer murderers like Luigi. The only comparable bad of my side is being pro death penalty for heinous criminals, which to compare the killing of a horrible person and an innocent person is insane. 

It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to turn a kid like this into a "liberal." He hated everyone and everything, not the least of which was him(her?)self. He venerated other mass murderers like the guy who shot up the Tree of Life synagogue. He hated Jews (I assume just because why not pile on here?), he hated Trump, he hated his former school, he just ... hated.

 

There is a real similarity here - no doubt explained in the dark depths of some weirdo internet "community" - with the guy who tried to attack the IVF clinic a few weeks ago. That guy was apparently pissed off that someone chose to bring him into the world without him choosing to be born, a weird paradox indeed. It was nihilism to the max, as was this. Destroy everything, or at least whatever you can.

  • Agree 1
Posted

I don't blame the kid at all. I blame the liberal policies of drugging and mutilating our kids. I blame the liberal policies of affirming, rather than treating, a mental condition. I blame liberal policies of ruining women's sports.

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

I don't blame the kid at all. I blame the liberal policies of drugging and mutilating our kids. I blame the liberal policies of affirming, rather than treating, a mental condition. I blame liberal policies of ruining women's sports.

 

Well, we can agree that in this case whatever the "transition" process was, it didn't make him happy or well adjusted. Maybe some are, at least happier and better adjusted than they would have been had they not been afforded the opportunity to transition. I don't know. But I do know that every kid who expresses a desire to transition is by definition unhappy and maladjusted; that's why they call gender dysphoria (that is, unhappiness)

 

I wonder if there was a dad in the picture at all. I don't want to go too far with this (in fact, didn't the CDC shooter's dad try to turn him in?), but it certainly appears to be part of the pattern.

Posted
10 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Well, we can agree that in this case whatever the "transition" process was, it didn't make him happy or well adjusted. Maybe some are, at least happier and better adjusted than they would have been had they not been afforded the opportunity to transition. I don't know. But I do know that every kid who expresses a desire to transition is by definition unhappy and maladjusted; that's why they call gender dysphoria (that is, unhappiness)

 

I wonder if there was a dad in the picture at all. I don't want to go too far with this (in fact, didn't the CDC shooter's dad try to turn him in?), but it certainly appears to be part of the pattern.

When the media portrays Trump as Hitler and dems use terms like fight back and we need to take to the street.

 

 

 

This is the outcome.

×
×
  • Create New...