Azalin Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 apparently the FBI is finding no criminal wrongdoing in the IRS's alleged targeting of conservative groups. thank our lucky stars that the feds have the ability (and credibility) to fairly investigate themselves. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303819704579318983271821584?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303819704579318983271821584.html "As far as I can tell, nobody has actually done an investigation. This has been a big, bureaucratic, former-Soviet-Union-type investigation, which means that there was no investigation," Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Can you say "most transparent administration ever"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 LOL...........investigating must be easy, when you are assigned an outcome before you start. That's funny, they only JUST started their investigation. FBI doesn’t plan charges over IRS scrutiny of Tea Party. Bryan Preston: The Fix Is In On The IRS Abuse Scandal. Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown: Wouldn’t you know, FBI says it can’t find anything illegal in all that IRS intimidation. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 *phew* Well that's a relief! Now let's get back to the crime of the century: an questionable on-ramp lane closing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Oh, you mean its not a crime to actually check if they qualify for a exempt status? Who'd a thought? Back to the Ben-by-gozi "scandal" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Only a Barack Obama administration can find no wrong-doing from an IRS event that came to light due exclusively to the head of the IRS admitting that there was wrong-doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Only a Barack Obama administration can find no wrong-doing from an IRS event that came to light due exclusively to the head of the IRS admitting that there was wrong-doing. But we've always been at war with EastAsia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Back to the Ben-by-gozi "scandal" Still laughing at how four Americans were left for dead by the WH and State Dept., I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 geeez the IRS must have the same lawyers the bankers do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Only a Barack Obama administration can find no wrong-doing from an IRS event that came to light due exclusively to the head of the IRS admitting that there was wrong-doing. LOL. From the right-wing rag, the Washington Post; Obama donor leading Justice Department's IRS investigation . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 LOL. From the right-wing rag, the Washington Post; Obama donor leading Justice Department's IRS investigation . How much longer will all those tea partiers have to stay in the gulag Obama has sent them to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 How much longer will all those tea partiers have to stay in the gulag Obama has sent them to? I believe Obama has three years left to his term. So three years. The answer is three years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 How much longer will all those tea partiers have to stay in the gulag Obama has sent them to? Oh goody, you're back from vacation. We can refocus on all the stupid things you say (regurgitate) rather than eating our own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Will Democrats be outaged when the Fed Probe fails to find evidence of Christie breaking Federal Law and regulations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Will Democrats be outaged when the Fed Probe fails to find evidence of Christie breaking Federal Law and regulations? No, because they got what they wanted: A news cycle on Monday that focused on Christie instead of the horrific job numbers from Friday that should have every person in the US crapping purple Twinkies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Will Democrats be outaged when the Fed Probe fails to find evidence of Christie breaking Federal Law and regulations? Now just you wait a cotton-pickin' minute. You're talking about a Republican. Everyone knows they're guilty as charged and must resign immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I wonder what correlation can be made between Christie-gate and all of the needless shutdowns and evictions punatively performed by the Obama Administration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Now just you wait a cotton-pickin' minute. You're talking about a Republican. Everyone knows they're guilty as charged and must resign immediately. Lol- he sure seemed to be Guilty to Proven Innocent yesterday on MSNBC.... just praying he gets nailed- I hope it turn out he fired the problem, and doesn;t let it happen again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Just the thought this guy would have some people so stupid high up in his administration. Not even a turnip brain like Tom would do something so dumb as hurt the public to "get" a mayor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I wonder what correlation can be made between Christie-gate and all of the needless shutdowns and evictions punatively performed by the Obama Administration? What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? Personally, I would have gone with "closing the ocean" as an example... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Just the thought this guy would have some people so stupid high up in his administration. Not even a turnip brain like Tom would do something so dumb as hurt the public to "get" a mayor. Tell me about it. If only he had a second in command like, oh, say, Joe Biden!!! :lol: What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? I believe Obama's particular genius was manning an unmanned national monument because there was no money to man the unmanned monument to keep people from seeing something that needed no one to oversee it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? Or evicting people from their home on Lake Meade because it's on leased land? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastalpika Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 If no one did anything wrong why couldn't Lerner just say that instead of refusing to testify? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 If no one did anything wrong why couldn't Lerner just say that instead of refusing to testify? Because it's his fifth amendment right. Got a problem with the Constitution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Because it's his fifth amendment right. Got a problem with the Constitution? What would you say are the key differences between President Obama's abuses of executive power, and Governor Christie's abuses of executive power? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Because it's his fifth amendment right. Got a problem with the Constitution? You really don't know what you are talking about, do you? Who is this guy named Lerner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 (edited) What would you say are the key differences between President Obama's abuses of executive power, and Governor Christie's abuses of executive power? Fool's errand | Define Fool's errand at Dictionary.com . Sarah Palin's father harassed by IRS six times since 2008 Read more: http://www.americant...l#ixzz2qTxdA3cM Paid taxes for 50 years and never heard a word. Then...... . Edited January 15, 2014 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Paid taxes for 50 years and never heard a word. Then...... . Just a coincidence !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 You really don't know what you are talking about, do you? Who is this guy named Lerner? It's just so adorable when progressives reference the Constitution. Kinda like when Obama references his years as a Harvard professor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 CLETA MITCHELL: What FBI ‘investigation’ of the IRS scandal? Last week, we learned that the head of the “probe,” Barbara Bosserman, is a donor to Obama campaigns and the Democratic National Committee. This is, someone who could hardly be trusted to understand what all the fuss is about. Now we learn that the FBI has “concluded” that there was no actual illegal activity involved in the IRS scandal, conclusions reached without ever speaking to a single conservative or Tea Party organization leader or attorney to learn what actually happened these past four years. Having represented dozens of groups before the IRS over the years, including many victimized by the IRS in this scandal, one might have thought the FBI might have called me or even one of my clients. But, to paraphrase the song, if our telephone ain’t ringin,’ I guess it must be the FBI “investigating” the IRS. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 It's just so adorable when progressives reference the Constitution. Kinda like when Obama references his years as a Harvard professor. Gatortard shoots off its mouth and doesn't know what it is referring to. See picture of Lois Lerner, the person it referred to as a guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted January 15, 2014 Author Share Posted January 15, 2014 Gatortard shoots off its mouth and doesn't know what it is referring to. See picture of Lois Lerner, the person it referred to as a guy. I almost spoiled it for you by blurting that out, but remembered at the last minute that I'd done that to you before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Why are we so sure this was a cover up in the FBI? Many of the researchers and agents who spend time on this are ordinary schmoes, right? Do we really think those schmoes were able to find something and have it covered up by their bosses that it then just vanished like a fart in the wind? Or are we thinking it was covered up at the top by directors so the agents could not find it? I do ask this seriously and for good reason, if anyone would be so kind as to answer it. I am very curious what the belief is in this situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Why are we so sure this was a cover up in the FBI? Many of the researchers and agents who spend time on this are ordinary schmoes, right? Do we really think those schmoes were able to find something and have it covered up by their bosses that it then just vanished like a fart in the wind? Or are we thinking it was covered up at the top by directors so the agents could not find it? I do ask this seriously and for good reason, if anyone would be so kind as to answer it. I am very curious what the belief is in this situation. Great question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Great question if you only knew, son I am not sure why and how bottom level or even mid level or directors could cover this up. I do think there was dishonesty in the investigation but I would bet all I have it didn't start with agents at the bottom or the middle. This was all at the top. The FBI don't play and the only thing more powerful then them is more FBI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Great question Aren't you in the least bit embarrassed that I posted a picture of the "guy" you referred to that plead the "fifth" and that meant that the FBI could then say that there couldn't have been anything illegal going on? If you had followed this story rather than the Huff Post's narrative maybe you would have avoided the shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 Aren't you in the least bit embarrassed that I posted a picture of the "guy" you referred to that plead the "fifth" and that meant that the FBI could then say that there couldn't have been anything illegal going on? If you had followed this story rather than the Huff Post's narrative maybe you would have avoided the shame. No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 No There it is guys. Gatortard is not in the least embarassed about having no knowledge about what it was spouting off about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 There it is guys. Gatortard is not in the least embarassed about having no knowledge about what it was spouting off about. its so easy setting him up. But it is an honest question. One I'd like anyone dare answer. It really can't be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts