sirebors Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Just some interesting anonymous observations: http://www.profootballweekly.com/2012/04/22/insider-gilmore-grades-as-second-rounder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florida Gator 14 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Interesting stuff. Excited to see what happens Thursday-Saturday!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirebors Posted April 23, 2012 Author Share Posted April 23, 2012 And this, lol... Bills GM Buddy Nix says the wide receivers entering the league "get prettier every year." http://www.profootballweekly.com/2012/04/16/nfl-links-newton-showing-more-maturity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Me thinks the "insider" is lying through his teeth. I think Gilmore is going in the top ten and a decent to likely choice of the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 “If (Stanford OLT) Jonathan Martin goes in the top 20, it is a crime. He is (very soft). He should go in the third (round).” If he's that soft should he drafted at all? PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shoutbox Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Me thinks the "insider" is lying through his teeth. I think Gilmore is going in the top ten and a decent to likely choice of the Bills. I can believe it. Gilmore was a distant 4th behind Claiborne, Kirkpatrick, and Jenkins until his combine workout. He got burned way too many times last year to be considered a top 10 CB. He doesn't have the natural instincts of a CB and may project better at FS in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I can believe it. Gilmore was a distant 4th behind Claiborne, Kirkpatrick, and Jenkins until his combine workout. He got burned way too many times last year to be considered a top 10 CB. He doesn't have the natural instincts of a CB and may project better at FS in the NFL. He's a guy that just absolutely flew up boards once he stopped playing games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I can believe it. Gilmore was a distant 4th behind Claiborne, Kirkpatrick, and Jenkins until his combine workout. He got burned way too many times last year to be considered a top 10 CB. He doesn't have the natural instincts of a CB and may project better at FS in the NFL. Until scouts, and the serious draftniks, actually look at all of the games that a guy has played from game tape, which occurs after the season and before the draft, the "considered to be top 10" stuff is pretty much based on reputation not real study , The guys that I personally think are the best of the bunch almost all have him in the top 10 after studying him closely. Mayock. Greg Cosell. Lombardi. Plus some serious plugged in reporters. Cosell, who i like a lot, considers him better than Claiborne after his study of both, which actually surprised him. He's a very good chance to go to the Jags at 7. To me, from everything i have read on all of them from all kinds of sources, he the best all around guy except for Claiborne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiebills Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I dnt no where this talk of Gilmore has come from, he has never rated highly with me. I understand if we take him in the 2nd or 3rd but not the first please not the first. I would love for someone to show me otherwise but I would rather reiff and keuchly before Gilmore in the first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I dnt no where this talk of Gilmore has come from, he has never rated highly with me. I understand if we take him in the 2nd or 3rd but not the first please not the first. I would love for someone to show me otherwise but I would rather reiff and keuchly before Gilmore in the first This and Kirkpatrick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillnutinHouston Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 After reading the article above, read the article on Bill Walsh's draftisms. Kind of puts it in perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringMe Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I would like to know who all these"insiders" are… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 There were insiders who thought Jason Pierre-Paul would be a bust too. It's been proven that "insiders" don't have the best track record either. Plus, there is probably more agenda in letting these comments go out than anything else. Maybe the Pats* would like a shot at him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 This is, of course, one man's opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I get this facial twitch every time I think of the Bills spending another high pick on a CB. Thanks, Dick. Let's also remember that cb's like T. McGee and A. Samuel can be found later in the draft. I think the Bills need to plan for CB need, but I don't think they're in desperate need for a starter this year. Please take Hosley later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainiac72 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 yeah, that's what i've been saying a while. it maybe true that some is based on going back and looking at the film, but even then a little is based on seeing what you want to see after the workouts. they see these guys do everything in these drills to suggest they can be a great player, and it's easy to forget there maybe a reason the production wasn't there. the game time instincts go a long way. i mean, McKelvin should be great.... but he's not, ya know? and it happens at every position. the game fade from memory a bit when you watch him do great drills. even good GM's have admitted they have been guilty of putting too much emphasis on the post-season stuff, even though they know better. maybe Gilmore ends up great, but the recent buzz that he's some bona fide lockdown corner does seem exaggerated lately. if true, i think people would have seen it to a greater extent before February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cash Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 After reading the article above, read the article on Bill Walsh's draftisms. Kind of puts it in perspective. Haha, I was thinking the same thing. Especially during the first 3/4 of the quotes, which were all negative. Everyone's overrated and everyone should be going a round later. Talk about CYA. I know if I was a GM, hearing that from a scout would tick me off. I know some drafts are weaker than others, but everyone's drafting from the same pool of players. They can't ALL be reaches. If a guy is one of the 32 best prospects in the draft pool, then he's a fine pick in the first round, even if he might be a late second-rounder in a different year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QCity Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Until scouts, and the serious draftniks, actually look at all of the games that a guy has played from game tape, which occurs after the season and before the draft If you are a scout, player assessment is an ongoing process that begins well before the season even starts. Your entire week is spent breaking down tape - every single week of the season. There isn't a period after the season ends where scouts say, "Ok, now let's get down to the real analysis" (most of the second-rate drafniks seem to say this). Wild post-season fluctuations are the result of the combine/pro day/workouts, character issues, or the perception of team need. Another thing to note is that CB is probably the most difficult position to assess from a fan's view. Sure, you can see when a CB gets smoked. But are you aware of when a CB blankets a receiver and forces the QB to his 2nd or 3rd option? Can you always tell when a CB flawlessly rolls to zone coverage and forces the QB to take a sack? You literally are taking the draftnik's word. And what percent of draftniks actually put in the work of a scout and study (or even have access to) scouting tapes? I'm sure Kiper/McShay/Mayock do, but what about the thousands of other internet mockers (Peter King, Walter Football, etc, etc)? With all the second rate mocks out there that parrot each other, it's very easy to create an internet upswell for a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 If you are a scout, player assessment is an ongoing process that begins well before the season even starts. Your entire week is spent breaking down tape - every single week of the season. There isn't a period after the season ends where scouts say, "Ok, now let's get down to the real analysis" (most of the second-rate drafniks seem to say this). Wild post-season fluctuations are the result of the combine/pro day/workouts, character issues, or the perception of team need. Another thing to note is that CB is probably the most difficult position to assess from a fan's view. Sure, you can see when a CB gets smoked. But are you aware of when a CB blankets a receiver and forces the QB to his 2nd or 3rd option? Can you always tell when a CB flawlessly rolls to zone coverage and forces the QB to take a sack? You literally are taking the draftnik's word. And what percent of draftniks actually put in the work of a scout and study (or even have access to) scouting tapes? I'm sure Kiper/McShay/Mayock do, but what about the thousands of other internet mockers (Peter King, Walter Football, etc, etc)? With all the second rate mocks out there that parrot each other, it's very easy to create an internet upswell for a player. While I agree with your overall point, I don't think that scouts have the time during the season to break down tapes of every target on a weekly basis. There isn't enough time in the week to do that. What they likely do is analyze a few games of the players they will watch live during the coming week, file away the notes and move on to the next player. Plus, I doubt that scouts have access to the full body of coaches' game film until the season is over. The scouts use the college season to gather the data, and use the offseason to analyze the data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 If you are a scout, player assessment is an ongoing process that begins well before the season even starts. Your entire week is spent breaking down tape - every single week of the season. There isn't a period after the season ends where scouts say, "Ok, now let's get down to the real analysis" (most of the second-rate drafniks seem to say this). Wild post-season fluctuations are the result of the combine/pro day/workouts, character issues, or the perception of team need. Another thing to note is that CB is probably the most difficult position to assess from a fan's view. Sure, you can see when a CB gets smoked. But are you aware of when a CB blankets a receiver and forces the QB to his 2nd or 3rd option? Can you always tell when a CB flawlessly rolls to zone coverage and forces the QB to take a sack? You literally are taking the draftnik's word. And what percent of draftniks actually put in the work of a scout and study (or even have access to) scouting tapes? I'm sure Kiper/McShay/Mayock do, but what about the thousands of other internet mockers (Peter King, Walter Football, etc, etc)? With all the second rate mocks out there that parrot each other, it's very easy to create an internet upswell for a player. I totally agree with that. We never get a true scout's reading on a guy, outside of the tiny blurbs once in a while like during the Bills luncheon last week. I was talking about the guys we read in draft guides and see on TV and read in the paper. Those are ones where the wild fluctuations take place. Personally, I think real scouts were always aware of Gilmore, he simply wasn't as well known or seen as Kirkpatrick because of Alabama. But Gilmore was one of the best high school players in the nation, started as a true freshman and was on the all freshmen SEC team, and was first team all SEC as a sophomore by the coaches (2nd in AP), and first team SEC as a junior. Combine that with good combine numbers and known to be a smart player and leader and squeaky clean as well as Kirkpatrick's off the field incident, there is no wonder he went up the charts for the draftnik guys. Again, I assume that the Bills scouts and Nix were very high on him all along. He's exactly the kind of player they love. While I agree with your overall point, I don't think that scouts have the time during the season to break down tapes of every target on a weekly basis. There isn't enough time in the week to do that. What they likely do is analyze a few games of the players they will watch live during the coming week, file away the notes and move on to the next player. Plus, I doubt that scouts have access to the full body of coaches' game film until the season is over. The scouts use the college season to gather the data, and use the offseason to analyze the data. Good points and good post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts