Tipster19 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 I just find this an interesting twist leading up to this year's draft. I would love for Buffalo to be in the mix for him but unfortunately I'm not expecting for that to be the case. One other thing, this is just pure speculation on my part, I think that we as a group are going to be in for a real big surprise in the way that the Bills use their first round pick. http://www.theredzone.org/BlogDescription/tabid/61/EntryId/25529/Handful-of-teams-interested-in-a-trade-for-Mike-Wallace/Default.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 1. Well, there are ties between OBD and Pittzberg. I wonder if our 4th would be good enough to do the deed. 2. What? CB @#10? Bill in NYC could get hives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Don't think the draft pick is the reason Wallace would be so hard to land. The 10+ million per year contract is the real roadblock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefenseWins Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 I think it may be more of a $$$ issue here... Ralph just spent $17mil a season on a DE... Wallace is asking for close to that from whoever signs him/trades for him... It's much cheaper to draft one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 The Bills have shown that they aren't going to pay another WR more money than Stevie. See: Meachem. Then again, Buddy could always surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missthe kgun Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Larry Fitzgerald money??? No Thanks!!! Go Bills!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Don't think the draft pick is the reason Wallace would be so hard to land. The 10+ million per year contract is the real roadblock. Exactly...It is the money that would be needed to sign him that is the roadblock not the draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Don't think the draft pick is the reason Wallace would be so hard to land. The 10+ million per year contract is the real roadblock. This^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 .... One other thing, this is just pure speculation on my part, I think that we as a group are going to be in for a real big surprise in the way that the Bills use their first round pick. I guess that depends on what you consider to be a surprise? The way I see it, there's nothing the Bills can do with their first round pick that would really be a surprise. The choices are fairly obvious: LT, WR, LB, CB being the positions of greatest need -- but there is so little depth on the roster they could really go anywhere and get someone who would "make sense". Even the extreme picks (QB, DE, OG, DT) would make sense on some level as would a trade down or up to get someone like JB or Kalil. The only pick that would make absolutely no sense would be a running back at 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smears Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 would be scary if New England got this guy...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 The Bills have shown that they aren't going to pay another WR more money than Stevie. See: Meachem. Then again, Buddy could always surprise. If they paid Meachem more than Stevie they would not be that bright. Meachem played in an amazing passing offense and his numbers were still forgettable. Wallace = Yes Meachum = Scrubville Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 would be scary if New England got this guy...... They won't. They're not going to pay 2 WR's over $10M/year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark80 Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 The Bills have shown that they aren't going to pay another WR more money than Stevie. See: Meachem. Then again, Buddy could always surprise. Did you just compare Wallace to Meachem? Hum... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve O Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 would be scary if New England got this guy...... Tommy isn't so terrific when he's on his back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missthe kgun Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 Tommy isn't so terrific when he's on his back Well What does it say, when he was sacked and hit far more than our QB, but still posted much better numbers??? Lets not hate on this guy, respect the game and maybe we can begin to have some good fortune come our way. Go Bills!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rayray808 Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 4th rounder for Mike Wallace? YES PLEASE 10 mil for Mike Wallace? NO THANKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 Lets not hate on this guy, Are you serious? I freakin' HATE Tom Brady! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 4th rounder for Mike Wallace? YES PLEASE 10 mil for Mike Wallace? NO THANKS There really isn't anything else to say on this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 Are you serious? I freakin' HATE Tom Brady! It's not just the hate on Tom Brady it is HATE TOM BRADY. Everything, his whiny gotta be my way attitude, his woah as me defeated pity, his dancing, his everything. The guy got a great contract from the Patriots and turns around and sues the owner after being the luckiest guy on Earth. Tom Brady is a fluke. A Pro Bowl QB gets knocked out of a game and nearly killed and comes in with an amazing defense, time to learn behind a great line and good coach with a better OC and QB coach, develops in to a good scheme QB and is now one of the best. I am all for Tom Brady may be among the best ever but I do not think he is a plug and play QB and if anyone denies he is anything but lucky then they're an idiot. Most backups in his position never get the chance to start that many games on a team and had the defense not been so good to win some of those games it would have gone to the the next guy in rotation of whoever was the Jeff Garcia at the time. By all means, Brady should have been just like Todd Collins or Kelly Holcumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 Well What does it say, when he was sacked and hit far more than our QB, but still posted much better numbers??? Lets not hate on this guy, respect the game and maybe we can begin to have some good fortune come our way. Brady gets more time behind his OL than Fitz did. Hence the reason he could put up bigger numbers, waiting for plays to develop. It's also the reason he got sacked more. He also had better weapons. I'd gladly trade O-lines and WR's/TE's from last year. This year remains to be seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts