DDD Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 lol I know what you mean but you got that backwards. The saying is fitting a "round peg into a square hole". It is because a round peg doesn't fit into the square hole because the round peg is bigger because it is round. Of course a square peg would fit into a round hole because a circle is bigger than a square. A round beg would have more surface area than a square peg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cocktosten Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 NFL network just showed Marcus Stoud was one of our key losses this year. But they did say we would surprise It's almost as sad as Chris Kelsay being one of our key players this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoretalk Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 He came to the Bills with a bad reputation and proved the talk wrong. He was a quality act who aged, had a body that wore down, and found himself in a defensive line-up that didn't match his abilities. Sadly, he was one of our biggest gaps last season as other teams just blew past him ... looks like his career is over and once again just proves how off-the-wall national media analysts are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 A round beg would have more surface area than a square peg. Thus it wouldn't fit in a square hole like I said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 If I was a 4-3 team Stroud might not be a bad flyer. As a backup the guy might still have a year left in him. Can't complain about him as a Bill it just wasn't the right fit in the scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted August 4, 2011 Author Share Posted August 4, 2011 Thus it wouldn't fit in a square hole like I said. What the hell is wrong with you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 Geez dude just try it at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Caveman Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 A round beg would have more surface area than a square peg. The circumference would be bigger too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 The circumference would be bigger too. Duh. A square does not have a circumference. That is why the words starts with "Cir". On a square it is call a perimeter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 Duh. A square does not have a circumference. That is why the words starts with "Cir". On a square it is call a perimeter. I always enjoy seeing ieatcrayonz say something, well, typical of himself...and then watching the reactions of the people who don't quite understand yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealityCheck Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 I always enjoy seeing ieatcrayonz say something, well, typical of himself...and then watching the reactions of the people who don't quite understand yet. I'm enjoying the fact that someone named Ieatcrayons is bothering to give a geometry lesson to someone named captain caveman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdub Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 I'm enjoying the fact that someone named Ieatcrayons is bothering to give a geometry lesson to someone named captain caveman. I enjoy the fact that Ieatcrayons and ...was it beerball?...had the same icon for a while, so now when I see the icon, I think it's beerball (or whomever talking), but it's complete nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungmack Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 I'm enjoying the fact that someone named Ieatcrayons is bothering to give a geometry lesson to someone named captain caveman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 What kind of wine goes with crayons? I've just picked up a box of 64 colors which I intend to dine on tonight. I was thinking of doing a 5 course tasting menu, but need help with the pairings: Burnt Sienna - perhaps a strong Burgundy Aquamarine - dry riesling Shocking Pink - maybe a blush or rose Brick Red - thats an easy one, cab sauvignon for sure and for dessert Banana Mania - a nice aged port, or maybe a fruity chiraz? Any suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 The saying around here is don't feed the crayonz. SHHHhhh! It's crayonz introducing himself to a newbie. Sit back and enjoy:thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 Stroud was cut off our team to get Carrington ONTO the field...... But then we also drafted Marcel Darius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rstencel Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 Thus it wouldn't fit in a square hole like I said. Wouldnt work either way if they had the same mass. round would get stuck in straight area, and squares corners would stick way out. If looking to force with same mass round would have a better chance than square though. As square would protrude out much farther, and if get it through with force wouldnt be a square anymore, and would chop off atleast 2 of corners in process of forcing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 (edited) Wouldnt work either way if they had the same mass. round would get stuck in straight area, and squares corners would stick way out. If looking to force with same mass round would have a better chance than square though. As square would protrude out much farther, and if get it through with force wouldnt be a square anymore, and would chop off atleast 2 of corners in process of forcing. Obviously one has to fit inside the other and it just so happens that squares fit inside circles, not the other way around. Like I said to the other guy........... Geez dude try it at home. Edited August 4, 2011 by ieatcrayonz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 Obviously one has to fit inside the other and it just so happens that squares fit inside circles, not the other way around. Like I said to the other guy........... Geez dude try it at home. I did an it worked. If it didn't, how else would round crayons fit inside a square box, Norman Einstein? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 I did an it worked. If it didn't, how else would round crayons fit inside a square box, Norman Einstein? It's a rectangular box so only an oblong doesn't fit into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts