reddogblitz

Actually I meant next week when he goes up head to head vs Happy Gilmore again. But TDs this week are good too!

I remember a PS game vs the Panthers a few years ago where he threw a long sideline pass to KB for a TD. KB was open because he pulled Happy Gilmore's hair on the way by slowing him up. Maybe next week.

I'm always thinking playoffs til we 're mathematically eliminated. there will be plenty of time to think draft come January (or February ?). he looked like the same old Nat e to me. Especially on the sideline pass like the Jax pick in one of the PS games, only the scrub DB didn't catch it. Not to get political, but McDermott could take some advice from W.

LoT of homesick yankees in Atlanta ...

Hopefully he can 300+ yards and a win like Kyle did in his first start.

then why only a one year deal?

It's stuff like this that keeps me from taking these people seriously. this is far from an isolated case. they think I'm stupid and will believe whatever they tell me.

I meant "nice try" to whoever posted it originally.

Nice try.

QB is the most WR dependent position there is. By stud WRs I mean 2 or 3 really good guys. Like what Atlanta, NO, Rams, Bungles, Ravens, KC, and Cardinals have for example. Rams have Woods/Cupp (who we could have drafted)/Cooks. Atlanta has Julio Jones and Muhammad Sanu and then traded up into the first for Ridley. They also traded up to the first to get Jones. AND they have Matt Ryan. And the team with allegedly the best QB last year traded a first round pick for a WR. sorry, we're going to have similar results until our "brain trust" figures this out. If you wanna compete with the big boys, you gotta have the WRs (and of course QB).

I disagree. Obviously you need both. If you don't have stud WRs your team will never be good and your QB will never be good. that's my story and I'm sticking with it even it my "thinking is flawed" (it's not).

Trying to out Trump Trump is a fool's errand. Results in more Trump.

Could be. But she'd be the first. He has literally beaten everyone else with that strategy including about 10 Rs and 2 Ds, 3 if you count Martin O'Malley .

The Elizabeth Warren DNA report reminded me of Little Marco getting out his cell phone and reading tweets. reacting to Trump is a losing strategy IMHO. You can't out Trump Trump and you never will.

I was happy. I thought we had finally figured put you need really good WRs to win. it almost worked. We were top 10 in scoring. Would have if Rex could coach D. Now we are back to Coach Gailey era WRs and even worse scoring. Bills will never be good or have a good QB until they wake the F up and get some quality studs at WR.

Having Nasty Nate on the team pretty much assures that. If he does start, I seriously think I may got on a nature hike or boat ride or something. Maybe see if I can find my tennis racket. He also threw one in PS but fortunately the DB didn't catch it.

We also had Harvin. That was the year I thought the bills had finally discovered you need good WRs. Didn't last long.

Did his team win?

McDermott is to offense as Coach Gailey is to defense.

I disagree. I listen to call in shows BECAUSE of the callers. I get tired of hearing these know it alls tell how it really is even though they're basically TBDers that get paid.. I prefer to listen to the callers opinions. However nowadays it's like reading TBD.

I would like to see the Ds take a bath. Maybe that would convince them that their all racism/all sexism/all xenophobia/all anti semetism/anti-transphobia/anti-gay ism/all the time strategy doesn't work. You'd think the 2016 election would have taught them that. I vote for Ds sometimes and I'd like to see them try to do something for their constituents as opposed to never ending investigations and name calling.

Link? https://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/nfl-quarterbacks-drafted-ahead-tom-brady.html/

Actually he was picked in the 6th round, so all 32 teams passed on him 5 times and some 6.

I hope Peterman does play Sunday. For Indy.

Trump used the wiggle room strategy most narcissists I know do. He said he would pay $1,000,000 if she were "an Indian". He didn't say he would pay even if she had only one drop of Indian blood. So he can wiggle out by saying she doesn't have enough to be classified as "an Indian." I don't know that the one drop of XXX blood was ever applied to Indians like it was blacks.