My final point was more about gun free zones in general and not this specific situation. My argument couldn't be more straight forward...If you can't guarantee my safety (and making a zone "gun free" in name only doesn't cut it) then don't take away my right to defend myself. And absolutely, the majority of citizens should be allowed to carry a weapon anywhere the government can't ensure our safety. Obviously there should be certain individuals that are not allowed to purchase a weapon and there are laws in place to restrict legal purchase already. I hope you understand that banning guns in an area like a college campus does nothing more than stop the law abiding citizen from carrying a gun. Murder is already very illegal, if you aren't going to heed that law, chances are you won't obey a "no gun zone" law! I understand not allowing weapons in places such as courtrooms, but there are measures in place to make sure everyone is dissarmed other than security officers. I think you would be shocked at how many law abiding citizens are carrying a gun around you every day. you don't realize it because they will never brandish that gun unless they fear for their lives or the lives of their loved ones. Contrary to the anti-gun rhetoric, the vast majority of gun owners hope to never have to use their weapons in self defense and certainly wouldn't consider using it out of anger over a parking spot or whatever other ridiculous scenario the anti-gun crowd would like you to believe.