DC Tom

Oh, come on. We've all done it. Actually, I see people pushing carts in the supermarket, and I think "Jesus, and you're allowed to drive?"

The fact that you dismiss the biochemistry so cavalierly illustrates my previous point: the belief that pot is harmless is belied by the stoners holding that belief. Or in a cloud of marijuana smoke.

The half-life for THC is 5-14 days. If you've smoked in the past two weeks, you're still impaired.

That's racist...somehow...

I'm surprised you could even read my post through the haze of smoke... Sober up. Then we can have an adult discussion.

"Near-perfect." You partake, I take it? I reserve substantive discussion for those capable of it. You're not. As usual, you lack yourself.

Hell, they go completely bug***** if you simply deny that they're special.

Sittin' on a mountain, lookin' at the sun. Plastic fantastic lobster telephone.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. I presume the Venn diagram of those who "promote" vs. "partake" is a near-perfect circle.

What???? How can you have a typhus epidemic in a modern American city? That's ***** insane.

The belief that pot is harmless is belied by the general dopiness of the people who promote it.

That would require me taking you seriously, which begs the question: What part of "weaponizing not ignoring you" do you not understand?

I'd be for hearings, since the report left the conclusion of obstruction ambiguous. But...c'mon, these are not serious people. They don't care if a crime actually occurred, they're just looking for an excuse to justify their actions. And AOC probably thinks "impeachment" is how you make a fuzzy navel.

There's two things the left has managed to do in the past two years, in such a subtle fashion that few people have noticed: 1) Make "Russian meddling in the election" equivalent to "Trump colluding with Russia." They've - once again - eliminated the middle ground: if you don't think Trump colluded, then you think the Russians are innocent. 2) far more insidiously,, in pushing the idea that Russia successfully manipulated the election with nothing more than Facebook memes, they've managed to portray Facebook as some sort of critical national infrastructure that has to be regulated to the detriment of constitutional protections. Can't have freedom of expression or assembly when you have to protect the people against Russian advertising. Odds are he doesn't even know the IC's conclusion himself.

Hell, the NAACP still calls black people "colored."

But if they're going to toss the baby with the bathwater, I think the only appropriate action is to ban the Yankees.

Live twitter, basically.

That thing looks like some sort of a cubist Sumerian temple.

"Then I'll get a white woman who's wearing a navy blue sweater..."

Neither is a particularly good example. In fact, they're both atrocious examples.

Today he's taken to retweeting sections of yesterday's meltdown as if they're somehow profound. My personal favorite is where he argues that the Fifth Amendment is obstruction of justice.

The dumbest headline you will see all day: https://apnews.com/f309ea14c9b346acb1d3b72c2564c56b?fbclid=IwAR1x2j5KapCguX2CcWv1ppg1d9xEt-KJKvoe-ejlNwFzU4wGt0bnSwy3BAY

I knew the new Apple iEucharist was a bad idea...

Almost all of Greek mythology is "Zeus was horny and kind-of in to bestiality."

I think "kinda" is still a stretch. Seems to me it was more like "Not really...he wanted to, but the people around him prevailed on teaching him the practical limits of the power of the office." Much of the "obstruction" claims coming from the lunatics come down to a misguided belief that mens rea is the sole determination of criminal activity. But you still need a criminal act.