DC Tom

AAAAAAAND...reports are she just fled the state to avoid prosecution.

That has nothing to do with any "deep state." She's just a garden-variety corrupt local yokel.

Hey, I'm just calling it what it is. Grandmaster-level trolling.

So according to Democrats, a majority of 63% of Americans want Congress to continue (because Republicans don't count).

"Along with one of her classmates." Who's probably a white boy, because another girl or a minority would have been mentioned by name.

Has nothing to do with any "deep state" theory, though. This has been in the works for a while. The discussions started back in 2013, after OPM royally ***** up the background checks.

"Trump has decided." Again, no different than Obama's exercise of executive privilege. Which was little different from Bush's. And I doubt Bush started the precedent. At worst, Trump is just furthering the erosion that started decades ago.

Because "Creepy" would have been more disparaging, and put him on the same "sick and twisted" footing Trump put the rest of the candidates. Instead, while still disparaging, he put Biden above them, thus putting the focus on them, and forcing Biden to either defend them or ignore the "sick and twisted" comment, thereby approving by lack of disagreement. Like I said, grandmaster-level trolling.

Except it didn't confirm those actual numbers. Which is why you're an idiot.

Of course. Because it's obvious he obstructed justice by interfering in the investigation to force Mueller to report there's nothing worth pursuing, when Adam Schiff has undisclosed concrete evidence that there was something worth pursuing... I wish they'd just shout "But there's consensus!" and stop pretending they're rational.

What dialog? You provided info that contradicted your original thesis. That's not dialog, that's you being stupid. Don't be stupid. Be smart, and make this a place of dialog.

Grandmaster-level trolling. Nice shift of the goalposts, you mental midget.

You couldn't legally serve that ***** in prison - seriously, if Joe Arpaio tried to give it to prisoners, he'd be sued for civil rights violations.

For those wondering where the "Trump is using law enforcement to target political rivals!" narrative is...it's coming. Here's part of the setup: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/24/us/politics/trump-clinton-justice-department.html

Private individuals have mounted automatic shotguns on helicopters. The Turkish government has caught up to where the American redneck was 5 years ago.

By the way...for those who foegot, the Rwandan genocide was in full swing 25 years ago this month. Which is one of the top reasons I truly hate this "female dog in heat."

Okay, since you're begging. He's Canadian anyway, so it's not like ignoring him is out of my way, really...

Or like when a Canadian like you calls someone else a Canadian, and you're both insufferable idiots.

Last time I tried to discuss climate change, I was blocked on Twitter by multiple climatologists for daring to point out that crying "We're all gonna die in 12 years" for the second time in 20 years was a counterproductive strategy for countering climate change. Climate change is never a worthwhile discussion. It SHOULD be. But it's not.

When the con man's fixer calls the con man a con man, do you believe him? Or do you instead ask yourself if you're being conned?

So I read the patent application. My second thought was "I wonder if this inventor can explain turbulence?" (My first thought was that someone trolled the Secretary of the Navy and the Patent office.) It's dilithium-crystals-in-the-Jefferies-tube level nonsense.

Plus, when you get down to it, their purpose was to sow discord. If manipulating an election were as cheap and easy as this, then Clinton would have done it - and won. Russia didn't "hack" the election. They "hacked" American society. They still are.

How is it that anyone believes the Democrats stand for anything?