Taro T

Definitely going to be interesting. And, though it's always true that people should track down original sources whenever possible, with this story it seems that'll be even moreso the case. Expecting a lot of dissonance between what gets reported & what's actually happening. Regardless of whos ox is being gored.

Barring actual indictments, that strategy will likely work. It definitely will be believed by the Never Trumpers. And ironically, any indictments &/or arrests/convictions will be viewed by them as proof of corruption being used AGAINST the ones that were already corrupt.

According to Senator David Perdue (who wasin the meeting), Senator Dick Durbin is the leaker & President Trump didn't say what Durbin claims he did. Senator Lindsay Graham saying that the President "basically" said what Durbin claims makes your assumption extremely plausible.

RIP Veteran Cosmic Rocker.

Remembered him always getting whacked by Ruth Buzzi but didn't realize he kept propositioning her the same way. (Was about 6 when the show's original run ended.) He was the guy falling off the tricycle as well, right?

???

As Arte Johnson used to say: Veddy Eenterestink.

You mean like focusing on someone possibly having had classified e-mails end up on their CoS's ex-husband's unsecured laptop? Be careful what you wish for, Gator. You just might get it.

Hey, hey, Ed it looks like we've got something here. "To be, or not to fgFjj ..." Nope, guess not. (Paraphrased from a Bob Newhart skit.)

Most likely. But Taylor gives 'em a 5% chance of winning. Peterman? Does anyone put it even at 1%?

Your point's clear as well. But having 2 1st rounders back in '89 gave the Pokes the same issues that people are stating would occur by drafting 2 1st round QB's this year.

IF Peterman had tied it & then won in OT, provided Taylor cleared concussion protocol soon enough to get worthwile practice in, I'd still have expected Taylor to get the start. Foxboro is a lot tougher place to play than a soccer stadium or Jacksonville. Really expect that Belichick would've eaten Peterman alive & that McDermott would want to have had a guy that's won in Foxboro calling the signals.

Not a huge one. That forfeited 1st rounder In '90 would've been the #1 overall due to their '89 1-15 season. They drafted 2 QBs they considered worth 1st rounders in '89 & ended up spending high 1st round picks on both.

In '89 the Pokes took Aikman in the 1st & Walsh w/ the equivalent of a 1st in the supplemental draft. My preference would be to use the 2 1sts to move up & get Mayfield if possible. If not, stay put & use 1 1st on best available QB.

In my undergrad program it was literally 50% male-female. The grad program was still 40% female. Other engineering majors were far more male dominated but that isn't across the board (and literally hasn't been for 30 years).

You trying to claim my wife's degree & accomplishments are due to quotas / affirmative action? If you are, would really like to be there when you try to tell her that.

That's what my PhD Chem E wife has always told me.

As long as any part of his bodyis behind the LOS, the throw is legal. His foot was on the line. It's a good TD. As for the review after the next play, honestly have never seen it called that way EVER.

Augie, you & your son will be in our prayers. Very saddened at your loss.

Me thinks you missed the joke.

The only way their pick could fall to 24 would necessarily include our boys having a bad day tomorrow. Chefs pick will be 21-23.

Appartently Triplett learned a new rule (though not how to interpretit correctly;)). The play was ruled dead because forward progress was stopped.

Technically, they're guaranteed their better pick will be within 21-23.

Yep. Can 21 & 32 get them a QB?