Taro T

Interesting, only Americans should decide US elections? So, you were all aboard with bringing the hammer down on your hubby when Gore happened to walk away with oodles of Tibetan Buddhist monks cash, right? Too bad there was "no controlling legal authority" actually able to enforce that one, right? (Funny how laws designed to keep politicians honest always seem to have such loopholes baked in.) And, you've never comingled Clinton Foundation money with your own nor has that organization ever accepted foreign donations, right? Oh, how silly, that money wasn't for electioneering, that was for policy setting; totally different realm. Yup, she's definitely legit in her criticizing on this.

Which is where 45's twitter habit comes in handy as he then likely says something that sounds so outrageous that the MSM pundits can't help themselves but to address it, bringing that at least to light. He also has the MOABs with the national Emergency texts & the ability to declassify anything he chooses. Both of which probably lead to actual shooting. Hoping that if the Spygate is as bad as it appears to be that the good people (& there are many) in the MSM pull off their own coup against those literally related to the bad guys. Really looking forward to what Huber & Horowicz put out and hoping whatever they found gets all laid out, though realizing that very likely might not happen.

Is firing one bad coach when they end up replacing him with another bad one truly "wise?" Figuring the last truly wise thing they did probably harkens back to the 60's.

When's the last time the Jest did something wise?

So, do the Dems nominate Tea Leoni this next time? Ya know, it's just crazy enough, it might work. :p

That could be the dumbest thing ever read here (not penned by Tibs) including 3.5 & Retatta.

Probably a wise choice. Anyone who's been getting their info regarding Trump/Russian collosion from either CNN or MSNBC (& other mainstream sources) will still THROUGH TODAY believe that Trump colluded with Russia against our national interests because that's LITERALLY what they are being told. Even at this point, with the Mueller report available & much open source info available contradicting that view, probably not a good idea to "turn this political" which is what the people buying into the CNN narrative would consider a direct shot across the prior administration's bow. Better to wait for the next phase of the rollout when the evidence of spygate is officially available before trying to shift that paradigm, IMHO. Those "mainstream" outlets are still doubling down on their entrenched position; those who listen to them will just dig in their heels harder & not believe what comes next if pushed now to believe that the "completely scandal free Obama administration" spied on opposing candidateS without ANY proof at all.

Been watching them as background most of the afternoon. They really are losing their minds. Of course, Chris might be admitting that they've ALREADY lost their minds, so they aren't actually currently losing them.

And now Andy Cuomo's brother is saying "the idea nobody did anything wrong or that this was a witch hunt or a hoax is demonstrably false ... hundreds of pages of piece of proof after piece of proof ... that they showed they were open for business for foreign entities in a way they should not have done & they lied about the same ..." And though it wasn't illegal it was still wrong. He just, literally, went All In holding Queen high w/ no chance for a straight nor a flush. Apologies, these posts should've probably been in the Media's treatment of Trump thread.

Stay safe.

And John King just called claims that the investigation was a waste of money is "horse manure." And Cavutto (pretty sure it's Cavutto, don't know all their talking heads by face) says the "report implicates the President in multiple crimes." WTF!?!?!

CNN is full out looney. Tapper said that the joke about 'Russiaif you're listening, find Hillary's e-mails' was PROOF of collusion regardless of whether or notit was said jokingly or not & whether or not it technically rose to collusion. Valerie Jarrett's daughter was quite perturbed that Barr was politicizing this matter. One of the other talking heads expects that Pelosi will try to back away from impeachment. No ####ing ####, Sherlock. The report says there was no ####ing collusion.

Apparently, 45 has released his answers to the questionaire Mueller's team had him answer.

Will be pretty amazing just how much more vile than normal twitter comments will be tomorrow. And on Holy Thursday as well. Doubt many (any?) of the commenters will realize the irony.

Sooooo, even though they officially won't know anything (other than was was in the 4 page summary) they'll come out & comment on it before they've readit? On what planet does that make sense? (Not even sure Tibs could defend that idiocy, though certain he'll try.) If they do comment on it even remotely accurately, won't they be exposing their own allies within the Mueller team? And if they don't comment on it, but merely decry how mean Barr is being, can they look ANYTHING but toddlerish? They've had ~3 weeks to prepare for this moment. Are they REALLY this ill prepared & cramming the night before the final exam?

Would be hilarious. But probably not wise to tell their enemies any more details about what they have on them prior to releasing the wave of indictments against the perpetrators/backers of the spying operation.

TOTALLY get why it matters politically. Can't see how it materially effects anything. So it is a particularly bad look for Nadler. It'll play well with his base, but makes him look bad to anyone still in the middle.

Just how dumb does Snopes think it's average user is that it felt THAT meme was worthy of debunking? Really expected to find out Snopes giving any sort of legitimacy to it was fake. Sadly, doesn't apper to be the case. SMH.

Wrong franchise. (Though probably more deserving of a sequel than VIII was/is. RIP John & Joan & any others now dust ~30 years later.)

More like the wormhole of idiocy. It all escapes out of him.

True. Perpetuating conspiracy theories is a job much better left to a Senator or a Congress critter.

So, does this count as the "completely scandal free" prior administration's 1st indictment? Or are they still "pure & wholesome" because this didn't relate to work he did while he was working for 44?

IF that's what put him over the edge, he never should've been in DC in the 1st place as something else would've almost certainly made him suicidal before 42's 1st term was up. Always figured he did kill himself & figured the Clintons were indirectly responsible for him deciding to do so, but not because they hurt his feelings. Just figured with their own malleable, shall we say, ethical standards and the annecdotal, but extensive, stories about how they treated people working for them that they created, non intentionally, a dilemma for him where he either stood his ground & not go along with something they wanted him to do which would've meant he wasn't working in his client's best interest or he sacrificed his own ethics for his client. Which in the pressure cooker that DC seems to be capable of, could lead to him deciding his best solution to the dilemma was to exit. And any rifling through his briefcase or repositioning his body that may have occurred were simply somebody trying to perform damage control after they found out he'd killed himself; not murdering him. IF that actually happened.

But that wouldn't have kept him from having to deal with actually getting such a charge dismissed. Nor would it have kept her from having a nice meme/ CNN talking point of how the Treasury secretary is a misogynistic/racist/senior citizen hating post-neo Nazi who has no respect for the rule of law nor the separation of powers.