Taro T

How much harder can Not Being the President be than is Not Being the Governor?

Expecting that suit just took a turn against the district's favor.

Of course ordinary people end up with more coins after one of her proposals should any ever get implemented. Coins are for the little people; $'s are for their betters in government.

I mean it is black and white no? what is there to argue? It may be technical, but on 04/09, he claims to not know if Muellars team has issues, and on 05/01, he claims he believes letter on 03/27 was snitty and penned by Muellars team.. I just truly don't understand where the argument is dude lied at some point..take your pick where Or, back on April 9, he was stating that since he believed his letter to Congress was accurate and adequate that he didn't know what members of Mueller's team considered to be inaccurate or inadequate about his release. He was asked if he knew what the Mueller staffers considered "not adequately or accurately" addressed in his summary of the report. He stated he did not. Again, he considered what he wrote to be adequate and accurate, or else he wouldn't have written it. He used weasel words ahead of stating that they wanted their summaries released and he had no intention of doing that, but he did in fact state they wanted the summaries released back on April 9. And this is what the D's are trying to bury him with. He said he didn't know what Mueller's staffers thought was specifically wrong with his summary but that they "probably" wanted their summary released as well. (Again, weasel word as probably includes certainly.) And that 2 page memo from Mueller doesn't state what he/his team believes to be inaccurate, just that their summaries were perfect in characterizing the full report and as such they should have been released immediately. Not seeing his initial answer as a lie, and not seeing his responses to Hirono or Blumenthal as lies either. Maybe his response to one of the others was?

Having a hard enough time finding the time to get fully through the Mueller report.

Should any of the "least scandalous administration everTM" members start to get indicted, will you look at the evidence before shouting "witch hunt" or just go there directly?

In fairness, Brian Williams was in THE ROOM where this all went down & we should all be appreciative that he's as honorable a soldier as he is. 'Course, he MIGHT have watched a SMIDGE too much of "You are There" as a kid.

He also was the WSJ's token lefty on the editorial pages (since followed by Alan Blinder & then William Galston). Anyone that read the Journal knew what they were getting from him. He was consistent.

Isn't the guy being supported in the "coup" the one who actually won the election?

Eric Stratton, rush chairman, damn glad to meet you.

Hockenson was my preferred guy, but Oliver was an extremely close 2nd. Beane does seem to understand how these drafts work. Made as many moved as he needed to get the 2 guys he wanted last year (& didn't lose any of this year's high picks) and managed to stay put for the 1 he wanted this year.

Interesting, only Americans should decide US elections? So, you were all aboard with bringing the hammer down on your hubby when Gore happened to walk away with oodles of Tibetan Buddhist monks cash, right? Too bad there was "no controlling legal authority" actually able to enforce that one, right? (Funny how laws designed to keep politicians honest always seem to have such loopholes baked in.) And, you've never comingled Clinton Foundation money with your own nor has that organization ever accepted foreign donations, right? Oh, how silly, that money wasn't for electioneering, that was for policy setting; totally different realm. Yup, she's definitely legit in her criticizing on this.

Which is where 45's twitter habit comes in handy as he then likely says something that sounds so outrageous that the MSM pundits can't help themselves but to address it, bringing that at least to light. He also has the MOABs with the national Emergency texts & the ability to declassify anything he chooses. Both of which probably lead to actual shooting. Hoping that if the Spygate is as bad as it appears to be that the good people (& there are many) in the MSM pull off their own coup against those literally related to the bad guys. Really looking forward to what Huber & Horowicz put out and hoping whatever they found gets all laid out, though realizing that very likely might not happen.

Is firing one bad coach when they end up replacing him with another bad one truly "wise?" Figuring the last truly wise thing they did probably harkens back to the 60's.

When's the last time the Jest did something wise?

So, do the Dems nominate Tea Leoni this next time? Ya know, it's just crazy enough, it might work. :p

That could be the dumbest thing ever read here (not penned by Tibs) including 3.5 & Retatta.

Probably a wise choice. Anyone who's been getting their info regarding Trump/Russian collosion from either CNN or MSNBC (& other mainstream sources) will still THROUGH TODAY believe that Trump colluded with Russia against our national interests because that's LITERALLY what they are being told. Even at this point, with the Mueller report available & much open source info available contradicting that view, probably not a good idea to "turn this political" which is what the people buying into the CNN narrative would consider a direct shot across the prior administration's bow. Better to wait for the next phase of the rollout when the evidence of spygate is officially available before trying to shift that paradigm, IMHO. Those "mainstream" outlets are still doubling down on their entrenched position; those who listen to them will just dig in their heels harder & not believe what comes next if pushed now to believe that the "completely scandal free Obama administration" spied on opposing candidateS without ANY proof at all.

Been watching them as background most of the afternoon. They really are losing their minds. Of course, Chris might be admitting that they've ALREADY lost their minds, so they aren't actually currently losing them.

And now Andy Cuomo's brother is saying "the idea nobody did anything wrong or that this was a witch hunt or a hoax is demonstrably false ... hundreds of pages of piece of proof after piece of proof ... that they showed they were open for business for foreign entities in a way they should not have done & they lied about the same ..." And though it wasn't illegal it was still wrong. He just, literally, went All In holding Queen high w/ no chance for a straight nor a flush. Apologies, these posts should've probably been in the Media's treatment of Trump thread.

Stay safe.

And John King just called claims that the investigation was a waste of money is "horse manure." And Cavutto (pretty sure it's Cavutto, don't know all their talking heads by face) says the "report implicates the President in multiple crimes." WTF!?!?!

CNN is full out looney. Tapper said that the joke about 'Russiaif you're listening, find Hillary's e-mails' was PROOF of collusion regardless of whether or notit was said jokingly or not & whether or not it technically rose to collusion. Valerie Jarrett's daughter was quite perturbed that Barr was politicizing this matter. One of the other talking heads expects that Pelosi will try to back away from impeachment. No ####ing ####, Sherlock. The report says there was no ####ing collusion.

Apparently, 45 has released his answers to the questionaire Mueller's team had him answer.

Will be pretty amazing just how much more vile than normal twitter comments will be tomorrow. And on Holy Thursday as well. Doubt many (any?) of the commenters will realize the irony.