Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. What's your point? You're trying to turn a common phrase into something it's not. If I had said something like "out of the tent," then I would agree with what otherwise are your continued efforts to gaslight and to mislead. But I didn't. And your continued efforts to twist, and to contort, and to mislead are part of the problem.
  2. This has nothing to do with what we have been talking about and your projection of points made by relatively anonymous individuals to large groups. It's your shtick. And it's part of the problem.
  3. You have again proved my point. Extrapolating what one or two or even some people say on Twitter to a broad group is a big part of the problem on both sides.
  4. Wrong again. "Off the stage" doesn't come remotely close to "murder." Keep on gaslighting.
  5. Another example of painting with a broad brush. NOBODY should celebrate this violence. It's abhorrent. But does that mean that everyone who acted so improperly is "woke" (whatever that means)? Not in the least.
  6. No, I didn't. Keep on gaslighting and keep on being part of the problem.
  7. Yeah, sure. Whatever. Nobody talked about murder except for you. Keep on inflaming. You're part of the problem. Who is "they?" And gaslighting hardly is a one way street. J6 was a day of love? We're for law and order, but we issue pardons to people who participated in that nonsense? Give me a break. All of it has to stop on both sides.
  8. None. Why are you suggesting murder? What makes you think of that as opposed to quiet retirement? The nonsense you just spouted is part of the problem.
  9. Wrong. Both sides can be in the wrong. The point is that all of this nonsense has to stop. And stopping it means stopping all of it. Including the types of BS that are quotes at the outset of this thread.
  10. This can go to an extreme. Do I trust the elevator guy with the MAGA hat to properly install the elevator in my building? A fair question. At some point all of this suspicion and nonsense and blame game has to stop. Want some truth? Trump is an abomination. A pathological liar. People on the left feel (rightfully) like he can't be trusted. People on the right defend his blatant lies and mistruths, which causes people on the left extraordinary frustration and to question their intellectual integrity, character, and honesty. Then, people on the right have, in many instances, raised fair and legitimate points about, for example, a variety of cultural issues and security issues. I'll say that, taking the border wall out of the picture, the right has been correct about border security, and about taking a tough stance with China. But then the left lumps the right together and calls them all racist, Nazi, etc. Some of the frustration of the left--"the China virus"--is warranted. However, I understand the frustration of the right in that respect. Of course, the right is not shy about calling people commies, and hate-filled, and pedos, etc. And so we can keep going down this path of blaming each other, and having hurt feelings, and engaging in inflammatory rhetoric that both sides rightfully find frustrating or insulting. Or we can all knock it off and try to be more respectful and figure this thing out before somebody else is killed for expressing a viewpoint. Here's another hard truth that doesn't make me a commie or a pedo or whatever. Trump is not the man for the moment. People on the right want certain social changes and security improvements? Maybe find somebody with similar positions who isn't such a divisive, selfish, inept leader and you'll really start to make some progress. I don't doubt that for a second. I also don't think that Trump is capable of unifying anything or anyone. That's just the reality of it. He's a divider. Always has been, always will be. Nothing changes until the "old" crowd - Trump, the Clintons, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, and Mike Johnson - all are off the stage. The sooner the better, and hopefully we can find some sense of normal.
  11. That describes your rhetoric. As far as the insults go, look in the mirror. "Lowest form of life" seems to be something you said just this morning. You are part of the problem. If Simon's going to do something, he ought to take a look at what you write. Again, Big Blitz is part of the problem.
  12. But we don't here. So tone it down. Precisely the sort of rhetoric that has to stop. "You people remain the absolute lowest forms of life on earth." Prone to hyperbole much? Knock it off. You're part of the problem. That's the point. Two-tiered economy. Regular unskilled labor has a problem right now.
  13. Doesn’t rule out two tiered economy. Skilled labor will get paid. Unskilled labor, probably not so much based on recent jobs report. It’s gonna get tight for them.
  14. I don’t wanna get into speculation, particularly when there is a victim to be mourned. But I will say that something about this strikes me as very strange and certainly very deliberate, if not professional. Thomas Crooks and Sirhan this is not. My guess is two tiered economy. Agreed.
  15. We share the frustration with the lazy. I see it as a “thousand pound sisters” problem. I have a lot of contempt for that. No, you didn’t read it properly. He said natural born.
  16. So a naturalized citizen who paid taxes doesn’t get the net? And what about kids, citizens or otherwise?.
  17. It’s turning the same “pedo” stuff that MAGA has tossed around toward people like me (and, in real life, me) back toward MAGA. It’s a form of satire. If you can’t understand that, then I can’t help you,
  18. Who is “they?” Also, BPS teachers are on the low end of public school pay scale. But I agree that those who want respect must earn it and that the fights, etc. have no place in school or anywhere else.
  19. But Im a pedo or evil? This is exactly why the rhetoric has to be toned down on both sides. School choice (vouchers) isn’t a great solution because it threatens the integrity of the public school system. Same logic applies to rural America. We just agree to disagree there.
  20. Nobody said anything along the lines of what you’re saying. The point is that kid on grape st deserves a good school, and good transportation to and from school, and maybe a meal or two to help concentrate at school, and a safe school, so he can have an equal shot. The same applies to Johnny Rural, and nobody has said (or acted, for that matter) differently. Get bad grades, or get a RAP record? Not my problem. But they all - grape st and rural America - deserve a fair shot.
  21. So you agree that, to some extent, we have to level the field at least at an early stage to give that kid on Grape St. a fair shot. What he does with it is on him. Work apparently is slow these days. I couldn’t resist. Back to no more joking around now.
  22. Agreed. Drugs, lazy, obese, hopelessness. It’s not a racial issue at all. As much white as anything else.
  23. Then prove it. Where is all of this free stuff? And, while we’re at it, why do I subsidize the thousand pound sisters? We should prioritize those who are here (citizens and legals). Things are way too expensive (electricity and food), and nobody’s doing a damn thing about it. But we also can’t be angry about every dime - you about immigrant kids, me about the thousand pound sisters. Now, if it turns out that an inordinate amount of money is spent on free “this and that” for illegals, then im with you all day. But let’s see what the numbers say and take it from there. Offer rejected, to your likely chagrin. And again, you’re part of the problem when you paint so broadly.
×
×
  • Create New...